Skip to main content

Table 4 Incidence of first or only and all OPD attendances, and incidence of attendance in all time at risk, and within 28 days of IPTi dose one

From: Evaluating the effectiveness of IPTi on malaria using routine health information from sentinel health centres in southern Tanzania

 

Intervention Area

Comparison Area

Effect

Intention to treat *

Events

PYAR

Rate

Events

PYAR

Rate

RR (95% CI)

p value

PE (95% CI)

Health centre attendance (first or only)

         

crude

2160

1535.3

1.407

2067

1434.4

1.441

0.97 (0.92-1.04)

0.417

3% (-4%,8%)

adjusted ‡

      

1.04 (0.75-1.45)

0.795

-4% (-45%,25%)

Health centre attendances (all episodes)

         

crude

3631

1810.5

2.005

3425

1699.3

2.015

0.99 (0.95-1.04)

0.834

1% (-4%,5%)

adjusted † ‡

      

1.05 (0.75-1.48)

0.736

-5% (-48%,25%)

 

IPTi Intervention Area

Corresponding EPI vaccine Comparison Area

Effect

Per protocol **

Events

PYAR

Rate

Events

PYAR

Rate

RR (95% CI)

p value

PE (95% CI)

Health centre attendances (all episodes) in ATAR since IPTi dose

         

IPTi dose 1

         

crude

1109

565.2

1.960

1082

466.6

2.317

0.84 (0.78-0.92)

0.001

16% (8%,22%)

adjusted † ‡

      

0.98 (0.69-1.38)

0.907

2% (-38%,31%)

Health centre attendance (all episodes) within 28 days of IPTi dose

         

IPTi dose 1

         

crude

106

93.7

1.131

125

80.3

1.556

0.73 (0.56-0.94)

0.016

27% (6%,44%)

adjusted † ‡

      

0.82 (0.48-1.40)

0.421

18% (-40%,52%)

  1. * Intention to treat analyses comparing IPTi intervention and comparison areas
  2. ** Per protocol analyses comparing children who received IPTi in intervention areas to those that received corresponding EPI vaccines in comparison areas
  3. EPI = expanded programme on immunization, PAYR = person years at risk, ATAR = all time at risk, RR = rate ratio, CI = confidence interval, PE = protective efficacy
  4. † Results adjusted for clustering within children for multiple episodes of all-cause health centre attendance using Poisson random effects modeling
  5. ‡ Using intervention and comparison area mean rate, unpaired t test p value and approximate 95% CI that adjust for clustering by health centre