Volume 11 Supplement 1

Challenges in malaria research

Open Access

Artemther-lumefantrine is partially effective for treating chronic multi-species malaria in Ugandan pre-school children

  • Martha Betson1,
  • José C Sousa-Figueiredo1, 2,
  • Sarah Clifford1,
  • Aaron Atuhaire3,
  • Moses Arinaitwe3,
  • Moses Adriko3,
  • Gerald Mwesigwa3,
  • Juma Nabonge4,
  • Narcis B Kabatereine3,
  • Colin J Sutherland2 and
  • J Russell Stothard1
Malaria Journal201211(Suppl 1):P11

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-S1-P11

Published: 15 October 2012

Background

In Uganda artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria. During a longitudinal study (SIMI project) investigating the dynamics of intestinal schistosomiasis and malaria in Ugandan lakeshore communities, a consistently high prevalence of malaria was found in young children (including many mixed infections of Plasmodium falciparum with P. malariae and/or P. ovale sspp), despite use of AL for home-based management of malaria. As a first step to gather evidence on the effectiveness of AL in this setting, a community-based observational study was initiated in an area of intense malaria transmission.

Materials and methods

The study was carried out in Bukoba village, Mayuge District. A group of children (W = 163) within the SIMI cohort was selected on the basis of a positive First Response rapid diagnostic test (RDT) result and microscopy-confirmed malaria. Children were actively followed up 7 and 17 days after baseline. Individuals who were RDT-positive on Day 17 were also followed up on Day 24. At each time-point, a blood smear archive was made and microscopy was performed two-three days after samples were taken. In addition, blood spots were collected onto Whatmann 3MM filter paper. Treatment decisions in the field were based on RDT results. All study participants were treated with AL at baseline. Children who were malaria positive by OptiMAL RDT on Day 7 were retreated with AL and those who were malaria positive on Day 17 were treated with oral quinine. All children were tested for Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth infections at baseline and treated with praziquantel and albendazole.

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood spots using chelex and real-time PCR diagnosis of Plasmodium species was performed. To distinguish between recrudescent and new infections, genotyping of merozoite surface proteins (msp1 and msp2) and glutamate-rich protein (glurp) was carried out.

Results

Forty children (26.3%) were microscopy-positive for malaria on Day 7 and 33 (21.3%) on Day 17. After genotyping, 33 (21.9%) and 17 (11.7%) children were shown to have recrudescent infections on Days 7 and 17, respectively. Of the 28 children who had received two consecutive AL treatments, 11 were microscopy positive on Day 17.

Multi-species Plasmodium infections were common, with 41.1% of children positive for P. falciparum/P. malariae, 9.2% positive for P. falciparum/P. ovale sspp. and 8.0% for all three species at baseline. By real-time PCR 39.9% of those children infected with falciparum malaria at baseline were P. falciparum positive at Day 17 and 9.2% of those who were infected with P. malariae at baseline were P. malariae positive at Day 17. On Day 24, after two or three consecutive anti-malarial treatments, 10 children were infected with P. falciparum and two with P. malariae.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that AL may not be as effective as previously thought for treatment of malaria at a community-based level in Uganda and that further more formalised efficacy studies of this drug in high transmission settings are required, particularly in areas where mixed-species malaria infections are common and where mass administration of anthelminthic drugs is being carried out.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
(2)
Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(3)
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health
(4)
Vector Control Division

Copyright

© Betson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement