- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Consistently high baseline estimates for the proportion of human exposure to rural African malaria vector populations that occurred indoors
© Huho et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Published: 15 October 2012
- Malaria Transmission
- Human Exposure
- Indoor Residual Spray
- Malaria Vector
Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are highly effective options for controlling malaria transmission in Africa because the most important vectors, which are from the Anopheles gambiae complex and the An. funestus group, prefer biting humans who are indoors at night. It is feared that sustained large scale use of ITNs and IRS can cause these vectors to shift biting in place and time where ITNs and IRS are not effective.
Matched surveys of mosquito and human behavior from six rural sites in Burkina Faso, Tanzania, Zambia, and Kenya with ITN coverage ranging from 0.2% to 82.5% were used to calculate the proportion of human exposure to Anopheles gambiae sensu lato and An. funestus s.l. that occurs indoors (π i ) as an indicator of the maximum level of personal protection that ITN use can provide. The proportion of mosquitoes caught indoors (P i ) and between the first and last hours when most people are indoors (P fl ) were also calculated as underlying indicators of vector preference for feeding indoors or at night, respectively.
The vast majority of human exposure to Anopheles bites occurred indoors (π i = 0.90-1.00). Neither An. gambiae s.l. nor An. funestus s.l. strongly preferred feeding indoors (P i = 0.46-0.63 and 0.22-0.72, respectively) but they overwhelmingly preferred feeding at times when most humans were indoors (P fl = 0.84-1.00 and 0.93-0.99, respectively).
These quantitative summaries of behavioral interactions between humans and mosquitoes establish baseline values against which behaviour observed in residual vector populations exposed to high ITN or IRS coverage can be compared. Longitudinal monitoring of these quantities is vital to evaluate the effectiveness of ITNs and IRS and to evaluate the need for development of complementary measures targeting the outdoor-biting vectors.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.