- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Estimating transmission intensity from P.falciparum serological data using antibody density models
© Pothin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Published: 15 October 2012
- Malaria Transmission
- Antibody Level
- Density Model
- Transmission Intensity
Serological data are increasingly being used to monitor malaria transmission intensity and have been demonstrated to be particularly useful in areas of low transmission where traditional measures such as EIR and parasite prevalence are limited. The seroconversion rate is usually estimated using catalytic models in which the measured antibody levels are used to categorise individuals as seropositive or seronegative. One limitation of this approach is that the cut-off between positive and negative is arbitrary. Furthermore, the continuous variation in antibody levels is ignored thereby potentially reducing the precision of the estimate.
To overcome these limitations we developed a series of age-specific density models which mimic antibody acquisition and loss. These were fitted to antibody titre data from 12 villages at different altitude in Northern Tanzania to estimate the rate of acquisition of antibodies as a measure of transmission intensity for multiple P.falciparum endemic settings.
Our results indicate that a model in which the boost in antibodies following exposure depends on the existing antibody level (with a decline in the size of the antibody boost with higher levels of circulating antibodies) and that includes variation between individuals in the size of the response fits the data well. We obtained a high correlation between our new estimates of the force of infection and estimates of the seroconversion rate obtained from the original catalytic model (r=0.95). Our estimates were also highly correlated with the estimated EIR (r=0.83) and parasite prevalence (r=0.67) in these 12 villages. The precision of the estimates obtained using the density model was greater than those obtained using the catalytic model.
This approach, if validated across different epidemiological settings, could be a useful alternative model to estimate transmission intensity from serological data which avoids the need for an arbitrary cut-off value.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.