Volume 13 Supplement 1

Challenges in malaria research: Core science and innovation

Open Access

Assessing the impact of vector control interventions by measuring their effectiveness - what has been done in Madagascar

  • Thomas Kesteman1,
  • Milijaona Randrianarivelojosia1,
  • Patrice Piola1 and
  • Christophe Rogier1
Malaria Journal201413(Suppl 1):O5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-S1-O5

Published: 22 September 2014

The impact of disease control can be either evaluated by a classical ecological study, or by multiplication of the effectiveness of control intervention and the disease burden. The latter approach has the advantage of circumventing ecological biases. To evaulate the effectiveness of the malaria control program implemented in Madagascar, we conducted a nationwide survey in 2012-2013 in 62 study sites. This survey included (1) a cross-sectional study to measure the effectiveness of each control intervention on reducing the transmission, and (2) a case-control study to measure the effectiveness on reducing the morbidity. We present here the results related to vector control interventions, i.e. Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLIN) distribution and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) campaigns.

The cross-sectional survey included 15,734 individuals of all age groups among which 3.7% had a positive Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT). LLIN daily use was 52.3% in areas covered by universal distribution and IRS coverage was 64.8% in targeted areas. 818 uncomplicated clinical malaria cases were compared to 7,767 controls living in the same villages. Multilevel analysis of factors associated with a positive RDT or with the occurrence of an episode of non-complicated malaria revealed that LLIN daily use had a 45% protective effectiveness (PE) against infection (aOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.42, 0.72]) and a 48% PE against morbidity (aOR 0.52 [0.28, 0.96]). The PE of IRS was evaluated to be 23% against infection (aOR 0.77 [0.53, 1.13]) and 49% against morbidity (aOR 0.51 [0.39, 0.66]). In areas where both activities are implemented, coverage of LLIN was 21.3 percentage points lower than in areas where LLIN only were deployed. Combining IRS with LLIN provided almost no gain in preventing infection, but the PE of LLIN use against morbidity increased from 51% (aOR 0.49 [0.20, 1.20]) to 66% (aOR 0.34 [0.16, 0.74]) when IRS was added, although non significantly.

Our results indicate that, taken separately, LLIN and IRS perform satisfactorily but that their concurrent use might have a limited benefit as compared with efforts to improve the coverage of a single intervention. Given that in Madagascar, approx. 220,000 clinical malaria cases and 770,000 malaria infections occur each year, we calculated that vector control interventions prevented approx. 96,000 malaria cases and 197,000 malaria infections annually. Distributions of LLIN were implicated in the major part of cases (73.7%) and infections (80.5%) prevented, while IRS campaigns were implicated in 37.3% of cases and 31.2% of infections prevented.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut Pasteur de Madagascar

Copyright

© Kesteman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement