Volume 13 Supplement 1

Challenges in malaria research: Core science and innovation

Open Access

Preliminary evidence from microsatellite and 2La inversion polymorphism suggests DDT resistance drives genetic differentiation between populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. in South West Nigeria

  • Adedapo O Adeogun1, 2,
  • Kehinde OK Popoola2, 5,
  • Lizette L Koekemoer3, 4,
  • Basil D Brooke3, 4,
  • Adedayo O Oduola1 and
  • Samson T Awolola1
Malaria Journal201413(Suppl 1):P1

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-S1-P1

Published: 22 September 2014

Background

Resistance to the insecticide DDT has emerged in several Anopheles gambiae populations which has stalled its use in malaria vector control programs in Nigeria. Data on insecticide resistance in Nigeria are still patchy with consequent lack of understanding of resistance mechanisms. This study was therefore designed to investigate the relationship between DDT resistance, inversion 2La and microsatellite loci in Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from Lagos and Oyo State, South West, Nigeria.

Materials and methods

Anopheles larvae were collected from six localities each in Lagos and Oyo State. These were reared to adults and 3-5 day old adults were exposed to 4% DDT according to the standard WHO protocol. Resistance profiles were compared between Lagos and Oyo State samples using a standard t-test. All Anopheles mosquitoes exposed were identified to species using external morphology followed by PCR assay and restriction enzyme digest. Underlying genetic differentiation was first determined by conducting 2La inversion PCR on 231 Anopheles gambiae s.s. DDT resistant samples selected randomly from all localities. Inversion karyotype data was compared between groups (Lagos and Oyo State) using standard FST estimates. Genetic differentiation was further scrutinized by assessing the assortment of 10 microsatellites by PCR using the DNA products from the inversion analysis. Microsatellite data were analyzed with one locus estimates following standard ANOVA.

Results

Anopheles mosquitoes were resistant to DDT in all the localities surveyed with significant variation in mortality (at P < 0.05) between the two groups. All Anopheles from Lagos and Oyo State used for the study were morphologically identified as Anopheles gambiae s.l. PCR assay identified all Lagos samples as An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii while An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis constitute the Oyo State population with sympatric occurrence of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae The resistance profile showed the same trend with chromosomal inversion 2La profile. The FST for inversion 2La was 0.09 and 0.07 for Lagos and Oyo State respectively (P > 0.05). Microsatellite locus estimate revealed that four loci (AG2H26, AG2H637, AG2H772 and AG2H603) located within and outside inversion 2La accounted for the bulk of genetic differentiation between populations.

Conclusions

These data suggest that inversion 2La and four microsatellite loci are associated with the development of resistance to DDT in Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from Lagos and Oyo States in South West Nigeria. Microsatellite analysis shows that gene flow is extensive across all loci and that assortment of the four loci located within or close to inversion 2La suggests that the primary factor controlling DDT resistance is likely within or close to inversion 2La. A candidate gene that may at least partially account for these data is the kdr locus which is located near the centromere of arm 2L.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Molecular Entomology and Vector Control Research Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research
(2)
Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan
(3)
Center for Opportunistic, Tropical & Hospital Infections, National Institute for Communicable Diseases
(4)
Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand
(5)
Department of Zoology, University of Ilorin

Copyright

© Adeogun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement