Volume 13 Supplement 1

Challenges in malaria research: Core science and innovation

Open Access

Plasmodium genus- and species-specific real-time PCR using SYBR dye decreases laboratory time without impairing the sensitivity or specificity compared to conventional PCR

  • Christel Gill Haanshuus1 and
  • Stein Christian Mohn1
Malaria Journal201413(Suppl 1):P39

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-S1-P39

Published: 22 September 2014

Background

A newly published genus-specific PCR targeting mitochondrial genome was highly sensitive and specific (Haanshuus et al. 2013). The aim of the study was to decrease the laboratory time without impairing sensitivity or specificity, by converting the conventional PCR to real-time PCR using SYBR dye. A second aim was to include species-specific assays to be optionally run together with the genus-specific real-time assay.

Materials and methods

Using a well-defined patient material, previously described (Haanshuus et. al 2013), a real-time PCR using SYBR dye was developed. The protocol included genus-specific mitochondrial primers (Polley et al. 2010), as well as 18S species-specific primers (Padley et al. 2003, Haanshuus et al. 2013), though with separate master mixes for each target. As opposed to the conventional PCR the assays could be optionally run together, as the master mixes were optimized to fit the same standard cycling parameters. The material consisted of 26 confirmed positives and 82 negative ones. In addition a ten-folded dilution series of a standardized reference sample was included. Limit of detection was determined. All the positives and the dilution series were analyzed in duplicates. Threshold cycle (Ct) cut-off value was set at 35.

Results

The mitochondrial genus-specific real-time assay detected 24 of the 26 positives in both duplicates (17 P. falciparum, five P. vivax, one P. ovale, and one mixed infection with P. falciparum and P. malariae). A submicroscopic P. malariae was not positive in any of the duplicates, while a P. falciparum sample was positive in one out of two. The latter sample had previously not been detected by any 18S PCR assays (Haanshuus et al. 2013). The limit of detection was 0.2-2 parasite/μl. (The conventional genus-specific assay had a sensitivity of 0.5 p/μl). The specificity was 100%. The 18S species-specific assays detected as well 24 out of the 26 positives in both duplicates, with 100% specificity (no cross-binding). The submicroscopic P. malariae and the mentioned P. falciparum were not detected in any of the duplicates. The sensitivity was 100% screening the negatives.

Conclusions

The real-time assays showed similar high sensitivities and specificities as its conventional counterparts, though less time-consuming and more practical and user-friendly both for research purposes and clinical diagnostics. The sensitive and efficient genus-specific assay is ideal for screening large sample sizes; however, the species-specific assays can be optionally run simultaneously which is an advantage especially in clinical diagnostics.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, National Centre for Tropical Infectious Diseases, Haukeland University Hospital

Copyright

© Haanshuus and Mohn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement