Skip to main content

Table 3 Covariance in male reproductive success between mating days

From: Comparison of male reproductive success in malaria-refractory and susceptible strains of Anopheles gambiae

  

Black block

Red block

id

model

df

dev

AIC

df

dev

AIC

1

p.insem~cage+age

7

9.80

51.22

7

6.56

54.77

2

p.insem~cage

8

15.38

54.80

8

11.00

57.21

3

p.insem~age

14

20.07

47.49

14

16.96

51.17

4

p.insem~1

15

25.87

51.29

15

20.94

53.15

5

p.motile~cage+age

7

7.06

64.87

7

4.03

62.80

6

p.motile~cage

8

11.85

67.66

8

9.80

66.57

7

p.motile~age

14

22.70

66.51

14

19.73

64.50

8

p.motile~1

15

27.30

69.11

15

24.80

67.57

9

p.ovip~cage+age

7

6.40

60.86

7

5.50

52.15

10

p.ovip~cage

8

34.30

86.76

8

9.01

53.66

11

p.ovip~age

14

26.19

66.65

14

34.39

67.04

12

p.ovip~1

15

52.68

91.13

15

37.11

67.76

effect

comparison

Δ df

Δ dev

p

Δ df

Δ dev

p

age

1 vs. 2

1

5.58

0.018

1

4.44

0.035

cage

1 vs. 3

7

10.27

0.174

7

10.40

0.167

age

5 vs. 6

1

4.79

0.029

1

5.77

0.016

cage

5 vs. 7

7

15.64

0.029

7

15.70

0.028

age

9 vs. 10

1

27.90

< 0.001

1

3.50

0.061

cage

9 vs. 11

7

19.79

0.006

7

28.89

< 0.001

  1. For each block (black, red), GLMs were used to model the proportions of inseminated (p.insem), motile sperm bearing (p.motile), and ovipositing females (p.ovip) as a function of male cage (cage) and male/female age (age). For each model the residual degrees of freedom (df), the residual deviance (dev), and Akaike's information criterion (AIC) are shown. For each block, the statistical significances of the age and cage effects were evaluated using log likelihood ratio comparisons of nested models. For each comparison the change in the residual degrees of freedom (Δ df), the change in the residual deviance (Δ dev), and the p-value are shown (p).