Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Demographics and net distribution and ownership (95% confidence intervals in parenthesis)

From: Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda

Variable ANC Adjumani Campaign Adjumani Campaign Jinja p value Comparison
Households interviewed N = 378 N = 520 N = 547  
Household members
Mean (95% CI)
5.7
(5.3-6.1)
5.8
(5.6-6.0)
6.5
(6.3-6.8)
<0.0001 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Children under five years per household
Mean (95% CI)
1.8
(1.7-1.9)
1.8
(1.6-2.0)
2.0
(1.9-2.2)
0.005 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Sleeping places
Mean (95% CI)
2.3
(2.1-2.5)
2.1
(1.9-2.3)
3.0
(2.7-3.3)
<0.0001 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Persons per sleeping place
Mean (95% CI)
2.7
(2.5-2.8)
2.9
(2.7-3.3)
2.5
(2.3-2.7)
0.02 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Before distribution      
Households with any net previous to distribution
Percent (95% CI)
42.6%
(32.7-52.5)
27.3%
(16.1-38.6)
21.9%
(16.6-27.3)
0.04 ANC vs campaign Adjumani
Households with net to sleeping place ratio ≥ 1 before distribution
Percent (95% CI)
7.4%
(3.8-11.0)
4.4%
(1.8-7.0)
4.4%
(1.5-7.2)
0.15 ANC vs campaign Adjumani
Households with persons to net ratio of ≤ 2 before distribution
Percent (95% CI)
4.7%
(2.6-6.9)
2.5%
(0.7-4.3)
2.9%
(1.0-4.9)
0.11 ANC vs campaign Adjumani
Immediately following distribution      
LLIN distributed per household*
Mean (95% CI)
1.0
(n.a.)
1.48
(1.36-1.60)
1.83
(1.69-1.98)
<0.0001 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with net to sleeping place ratio ≥ 1 better after distribution
Percent (95% CI)
37.0%
(26.8-47.2)
60.4%
(48.7-72.1)
47.2%
(36.6-57.8)
0.08 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with persons to net ratio of ≤ 2 after distribution
Percent (95% CI)
26.7%
(20.2-33.2)
28.7%
(20.7-36.6)
34.0%
(27.9-40.1)
0.25 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
At time of survey      
Households that obtained additional nets after distribution
Percent (95% CI)
15.6%
(9.0-22.2)
9.2%
(5.4-13.1)
2.7%
(0.5-4.2)
<0.0001 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Nets owned per household*
Mean (95% CI)
1.68
(1.51-1.84)
1.94
(1.70-2.17)
2.21
(2.03-2.40)
0.04 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with net to sleeping place ratio ≥ 1
Percent (95% CI)
44.7%
(34.4-55.0)
65.8%
(55.2-76.8)
49.0%
(38.2-59.8)
0.025 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with persons to net ratio of ≤ 2
Percent (95% CI)
35.5%
(24.3-38.7)
32.1%
(23.7-40.5)
37.5%
(32.1-42.8)
0.26 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
  1. * proportion of households with at least one net/ITN was 100% in all groups