Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Demographics and net distribution and ownership (95% confidence intervals in parenthesis)

From: Costs and effects of two public sector delivery channels for long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda

Variable ANC Adjumani Campaign Adjumani Campaign Jinja p value Comparison
Households interviewed N = 378 N = 520 N = 547  
Household members Mean (95% CI) 5.7 (5.3-6.1) 5.8 (5.6-6.0) 6.5 (6.3-6.8) <0.0001 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Children under five years per household Mean (95% CI) 1.8 (1.7-1.9) 1.8 (1.6-2.0) 2.0 (1.9-2.2) 0.005 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Sleeping places Mean (95% CI) 2.3 (2.1-2.5) 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 3.0 (2.7-3.3) <0.0001 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Persons per sleeping place Mean (95% CI) 2.7 (2.5-2.8) 2.9 (2.7-3.3) 2.5 (2.3-2.7) 0.02 Adjumani vs. Jinja
Before distribution      
Households with any net previous to distribution Percent (95% CI) 42.6% (32.7-52.5) 27.3% (16.1-38.6) 21.9% (16.6-27.3) 0.04 ANC vs campaign Adjumani
Households with net to sleeping place ratio ≥ 1 before distribution Percent (95% CI) 7.4% (3.8-11.0) 4.4% (1.8-7.0) 4.4% (1.5-7.2) 0.15 ANC vs campaign Adjumani
Households with persons to net ratio of ≤ 2 before distribution Percent (95% CI) 4.7% (2.6-6.9) 2.5% (0.7-4.3) 2.9% (1.0-4.9) 0.11 ANC vs campaign Adjumani
Immediately following distribution      
LLIN distributed per household* Mean (95% CI) 1.0 (n.a.) 1.48 (1.36-1.60) 1.83 (1.69-1.98) <0.0001 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with net to sleeping place ratio ≥ 1 better after distribution Percent (95% CI) 37.0% (26.8-47.2) 60.4% (48.7-72.1) 47.2% (36.6-57.8) 0.08 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with persons to net ratio of ≤ 2 after distribution Percent (95% CI) 26.7% (20.2-33.2) 28.7% (20.7-36.6) 34.0% (27.9-40.1) 0.25 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
At time of survey      
Households that obtained additional nets after distribution Percent (95% CI) 15.6% (9.0-22.2) 9.2% (5.4-13.1) 2.7% (0.5-4.2) <0.0001 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Nets owned per household* Mean (95% CI) 1.68 (1.51-1.84) 1.94 (1.70-2.17) 2.21 (2.03-2.40) 0.04 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with net to sleeping place ratio ≥ 1 Percent (95% CI) 44.7% (34.4-55.0) 65.8% (55.2-76.8) 49.0% (38.2-59.8) 0.025 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
Households with persons to net ratio of ≤ 2 Percent (95% CI) 35.5% (24.3-38.7) 32.1% (23.7-40.5) 37.5% (32.1-42.8) 0.26 Campaign Adjumani vs. Jinja
  1. * proportion of households with at least one net/ITN was 100% in all groups