Skip to main content

Table 3 Habitat dynamics, productivity and diversity of Anopheles larval habitats sampled over 12 months in three ecologically varied villages in the Mwea Rice Irrigation Scheme (April 2004 - March 2005)

From: Anopheles larval abundance and diversity in three rice agro-village complexes Mwea irrigation scheme, central Kenya

Village

Habitat type

# Habitats sampled

% Larval habitats had water

# Sampled

% Larval habitats positive for Anopheles larvae

% Anopheles larvae alone

Larval density

(no./10 dips)

Pupal density (no./10 dips)

Mbui Njeru

("Planned" rice cultivation; >80% area under rice)

Canal

19

83.0

225

31.6

13.7

1.1

0.0

 

Marsh

6

19.5

17

47.1

21.2

1.7

0.2

 

Rice field

80

57.6

545

46.8

28.4

2.2

0.4

 

Temporary pool

96

14.4

374

36.1

30.5

2.4

0.2

 

Water reservoir

2

23.1

6

16.7

5.7

0.4

5.6

Kiamachiri

("Unplanned" rice cultivation; ≈ 25% area under rice)

Canal

30

62.7

330

39.7

16.6

1.9

0.2

 

Marsha

27

48.3

193

48.7

18.3

2.1

0.3

 

Rice field

108

52.7

749

56.3

35.2

4.1

0.2

 

Temporary poolb

59

50.0

423

44.9

23.8

2.8

0.4

 

Water reservoirc

2

46.2

24

25.0

5.8

0.7

0.7

Murinduko

(Subsistence farming; < 5% area under rice on valley bottoms)

Canal

9

97.1

133

65.4

12.4

6.7

0.7

 

Marsh

22

85.7

162

79.6

14.5

7.8

2.7

 

Rice field

83

86.4

1126

69.3

16.3

8.8

0.7

 

Rock pool

4

35.5

11

72.7

10.9

5.9

15.9

 

Stream pool

10

93.9

108

76.9

15.8

8.5

0.6

 

Temporary pools

35

90.7

234

76.9

18.3

9.9

0.6

 

Tree hole

3

44.4

4

75.0

5.3

2.9

3.8

 

Water reservoir

4

61.1

21

28.6

6.3

3.4

21.6

  1. a Marshes included seeps and swamps; b Temporary pools were represented by hoof prints, ditches, puddles, pits, tire tracks and quarries; c Water reservoirs represented tanks and wells