Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of non-linear regression analysis of ELISA-measured plasma PfHRP2 concentration vs. digital reading, and of interobserver variability assessment for each of four kits

From: Use of a rapid test to assess plasma Plasmodium falciparum HRP2 and guide management of severe febrile illness

 

Core™

Paracheck®

First Response®

SD Bioline

Digital assessment

 Top (reading units)

1867

1796

807.2

1414

 HillSlope

1.408

1.904

7.058

1.453

 EC50 (ng/ml)

63.14

36.25

75.91

66.99

 EC50 (95 % CI)

48.38–82.40

31.69–41.48

49.63–116.1

47.35–94.80

 Goodness of fit (r2)

0.9082

0.9627

0.5661

0.8516

Visual assessment kappa-statistic

 0—no visible band

0.7931

1

0.7785

0.7857

 1—faint line

0.3197

1

0.3262

0.3056

 2—faint band

0.7869

0.7432

0.6019

0.6296

 3—clear band weaker than control

0.7778

0.9187

0.5879

0.6384

 4—band at least as strong as control

1

0.9664

0.5662

0.85

 Combined

0.8602

0.9377

0.5865

0.7198