Advertisement
Table 2 Residual bioefficacy of used nets in Limbe, Tiko and Buea
| Sites | Brand | No. | KD 60 (±5% CI) | Mortality (±5% CI) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Limbe | Permanet 2.0 | 192 | 0.5% (±0.1) | 4.1% (±2.8) | Not effective |
| Olyset net | 199 | 1% (± 1.3) | 3% (±2.4) | Not effective | |
| Olyset net | 197 | 4.6% (±2.9) | 2.5% (±2.2) | Not effective | |
| Siamdutch | 189 | 29.1% (±6.5) | 10.1% (±4.3) | Not effective | |
| Siamdutch | 192 | 13.5% (±4.8) | 29.1% (±6.4) | Not effective | |
| Olyset net | 177 | 29.3% (±6.7) | 60% (±7.2) | Minimally effective | |
| Olyset net | 185 | 3.2% (±2.5) | 3.9% (±2.8) | Not effective | |
| Tiko | Olyset net | 103 | 52.4% (±9.6) | 74.8% (8.4) | Minimally effective |
| Permanet 2.0 | 115 | 84.3% (±6.6) | 82.6% (6.9) | Optimally effective | |
| Siamdutch | 88 | 60.3% (±10.2) | 54.5% (±10.4) | Minimally effective | |
| Olyset net | 117 | 89.7% (±5.5) | 81.2% (±7.1) | Optimally effective | |
| Olyset net | 117 | 75.2% (±7.8) | 55.6% (±9.0) | Minimally effective | |
| Olyset net | 99 | 93.9% (±4.7) | 71.7% (±8.9) | Minimally effective | |
| Olyset net | 115 | 91.3% (±5.2) | 83.5% (±6.8) | Optimally effective | |
| Buea | Olyset net | 189 | 4.2% (±2.9) | 14.8% (±5.1) | Not effective |
| Olyset net | 138 | 20.3% (±6.7) | 17.4% (±6.3) | Not effective | |
| Olyset net | 217 | 11.5% (±4.2) | 14.3% (±4.7) | Not effective | |
| Permanet 2.0 | 178 | 4.5% (±3.0) | 5.6% (±3.4) | Not effective | |
| Olyset net | 178 | 3.4% (±2.7) | 4.5% (±3.0) | Not effective | |
| Permanet 2.0 | 107 | 93.5% (±4.7) | 75.7% (±8.1) | Minimally effective |
