Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors associated with quality of malaria microscopy in selected public health facility laboratories Western Oromia, Ethiopia

From: External quality assessment of malaria microscopy diagnosis in selected health facilities in Western Oromia, Ethiopia

Variables

Malaria microscopy quality

OR (95%) CI

Yes (%)

No (%)

COR

AOR

P-value

EQA participation

 Yes

8 (80%)

2 (20%)

22 (3.1–163)

10 (0.4–2.231)

0.561

 No

3 (15%)

17 (85%)

1.00

1.00

 

Use of buffered water

 Yes

7 (77.8%)

2 (22.2%)

19 (27–145)

0.1 (0.012–1.07)

0.44

 No

4 (19%)

17 (81%)

1.00

1.00

 

Internal quality control

 Yes

7 (63.6%)

4 (36.4%)

6 (1.2–34)

1.6 (0.18–141)

0.11

 No

4 (21.1%)

15 (78.9%)

1.00

1.00

 

Practice staining quality

 Yes

5 (71.4%)

2 (28.6%)

7 (1.07–14.6.)

15 (2.35–18.6)

0.039*

 No

6 (26.1%)

17 (73.9%)

1.00

1.00

 

In service training

 Yes

10 (55.6%)

8 (44.4%)

13 (1.4–130)

16 (1.3–19.6)

0.041*

 No

1 (8.3%)

11 (91.7%)

1.00

1.00

 

Qualification

 Diploma

6 (30%)

14 (70%)

2 (0.48–11)

0.4 (0.09–2.05)

0.285

 B.Sc.

5 (50%)

5 (50%)

1.00

  

Smearing quality

 Yes

7 (70%)

3 (30%)

0.1 (0.19–0.61)

24 (1.8–31.3)

0.037*

No

4 (20%)

16 (80%)

1.00

1.00

 
  1. 1—reference group
  2. COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  3. * Significant at P-value < 0.05