Skip to main content

Table 2 The logistic regression analysis associated with the prevalence of malaria in rural highly malaria-endemic endemic areas in 15 provinces of Indonesia, with n = 259,885

From: Does livestock protect from malaria or facilitate malaria prevalence? A cross-sectional study in endemic rural areas of Indonesia

Risk factor

P-value

Unadjusted

P-value

Adjusted

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Sex

 Male versus female

0.000

0.849 (0.811–0.888)

0.000

0.842 (0.804–0.882)

Age (years)

 Productive age (15–64 years) versus not productive age (< 15 and > 64 years)

0.000

0.861 (0.812–0.912)

0.000

0.837 (0.790–0.887)

Community health facility

 < 60 min versus > 60 min

0.000

1.633 (1.2512.131)

0.005

1.446 (1.1201.866)

The condition of sewage canal

 Close canal versus others

0.001

1.250 (1.0951.427)

0.015

1.177 (1.0331.343)

Mosquito nets

 Yes versus not

0.000

0.805 (0.727–0.890)

0.157*

0.879 (0.736–1.051)

 Yes versus others

0.002

1.911 (1.2732.868)

0.005

1.838 (1.2082.797)

Insecticide-treated bed net

 Yes versus not

0.000

0.508 (0.439–0.588)

0.000

0.509 (0.440–0.589)

 Yes versus others

0.000

0.527 (0.457–0.608)

0.000

0.590 (0.481–0.725)

Raising medium-sized breeding animals

 Not have versus inside

0.000

2.980 (2.3483.782)

0.000

2.809 (2.2073.575)

 Not have versus outside

0.000

1.713 (1.5151.937)

0.000

1.643 (1.4601.849)

  1. Risk factors with P < 0.001 or P < 0.05 and OR > 1 are shown in italic face
  2. *P > 0.05 a confounding factor