Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect sizes and marginal effects of predictor variables on malaria

From: Investigating the upsurge of malaria prevalence in Zambia between 2010 and 2015: a decomposition of determinants

Variable

Unadjusted

Adjusted

Marginal effects

Odds ratio (95% CIs)

P-value

Odds ratios (95% CIs)

P-values

Marginal effect (95% CIs)

P-value

Age (12–59 months)

4.15 (2.90–5.95)

< 0.001

4.04 (2.80 –5.81)

< 0.001

0.175 (0.128, 0.222)

< 0.001

Sex (female)

0.89 (0.76–1.05)

0.161

0.90 (0.75–1.08)

0.240

− 0.014 (− 0.036, 0.009)

0.245

Residence (urban)

0.18 (0.12–0.28)

< 0.001

0.23 (0.15–0.37)

< 0.001

− 0.182 (− 0.241, − 0.123)

< 0.001

Altitude

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

0.827

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

0.034

< − 0.001

0.032

Standard house (yes)

0.27 (0.20–0.37)

< 0.001

0.40 (0.35–0.71)

< 0.001

− 0.089 (− 0.132, − 0.043)

< 0.001

Wealth status (not poorest 5th)

0.44 (0.35 –0.55)

< 0.001

0.65 (0.52 –0.81)

< 0.001

− 0.055 (− 0.083, − 0.027)

< 0.001

Indoor residual spraying (yes)

0.61 (0.46–0.80)

0.001

0.66 (0.49–0.89)

0.008

− 0.051 (− 0.089, − 0.014)

0.007

Slept net previous night (yes)

0.78 (0.66–0.91)

0.002

0.90 (0.77–0.97)

0.192

− 0.013 (− 0.033, − 0.007)

0.193

Rainfall

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

< 0.001

1.00 (0.99–1.05)

0.250

< 0.001

0.250

Temperature

0.73 (0.66–0.80)

< 0.001

0.71 (0.62 –0.82)

< 0.001

− 0.042 (− 0.060,–0.025)

< 0.001

MIS year (2010 baseline)

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  

(2012)

0.82 (0.64–1.05)

0.122

1.11 (0.84–1.45)

0.460

  

(2015)

1.48 (1.14–1.92)

0.003

1.69 (1.32–2.17)

< 0.001

 Â