Table 6 Difference in the proportion of nets passing WHO 2005 threshold criteria by combined WHO cone and Tunnel test methods compared to I-ACT for sampled Olyset®, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® nets
| Â | No. of nets tested | % pass WHO 2013 criteria (n) | % pass WHO 2005 criteria (n) | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olyset® | ||||||
 WHO methods | 145 | 71% (n = 103) | 77% (n = 111) | 1 |  |  |
 I-ACT | 145 | 94% (n = 134) | 94% (n = 137) | 5.2 | 2.3–11.8 | < 0.0001 |
PermaNet® 2.0 | ||||||
 WHO methods | 144 | 94% (n = 135) | 94% (n = 135) | 1 |  |  |
 I-ACT | 144 | 98% (n = 141) | 98% (n = 141) | 3.1 | 0.8–11.8 | 0.092 |
NetProtect® | ||||||
 WHO methods | 143 | 99% (n = 141) | 99% (n = 141) | 1 |  |  |
 I-ACT | 143 | 98% (n = 140) | 97% (n = 139) | 0.49 | 0.1–2.7 | 0.418 |
Overall | ||||||
 WHO methods | 432 | 69% (n = 379) | 90% (n = 387) | 1 |  |  |
 I-ACT | 432 | 92% (n = 415) | 97% (n = 417) | 3.5 | 1.9–6.5 | < 0.0001 |