Skip to main content

Table 1 Weighted malaria prevalences and number of febrile infections in the study area and neighbourhoods, determined by microscopy and real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

From: Changing plasma cytokine, chemokine and growth factor profiles upon differing malaria transmission intensities

 

Diagnostic

2010

2013

Individuals tested

Infected

Weighted prevalence of infection (%)

Lower 95% CI

Upper 95% CI

Febrile infections

Individuals tested

Infected

Weighted prevalence of infection (%)

Lower 95% CI

Upper 95% CI

Febrile infections

Whole study areaa

Microscopy

975

13

1.11

0.56

2.21

3 (23%)

944

45

5.22

3.64

7.42

18 (40%)

qPCR

970

106

12.59

10.09

15.6

15 (14%)

808

162

23.86

20.18

27.99

43 (26%)

Maragra

Microscopy

224

3

0.9

0.22

3.64

1 (33%)

206

5

3.9

1.57

9.35

4 (80%)

qPCR

223

33

17.31

11.85

24.6

3 (9%)

171

23

18.8

12.19

27.86

5 (22%)

Manhiça

Microscopy

297

2

0.23

0.06

0.91

1 (50%)

362

12

3.21

1.51

6.68

2 (17%)

qPCR

299

27

9.27

5.84

14.42

4 (15%)

298

45

17.37

12.34

23.89

6 (13%)

Malavele

Microscopy

56

1

2.55

0.36

16.13

1 (100%)

52

4

11.87

3.55

33.05

2 (50%)

qPCR

55

7

13.75

5.68

29.67

2 (28%)

48

10

19.49

8.35

39.17

5 (50%)

Palmeira

Microscopy

206

3

1.11

0.27

4.46

0 (0%)

195

6

3.43

1.31

8.68

2 (33%)

qPCR

205

15

8.9

4.84

15.8

1 (7%)

174

42

31.19

22.91

40.87

12 (28%)

Ilha Josina

Microscopy

124

3

4.2

1.11

14.65

0 (0%)

76

17

24.47

13.94

39.33

7 (41%)

qPCR

120

21

23.95

14.73

36.47

4 (19%)

70

34

52

36.98

66.67

13 (38%)

Taninga

Microscopy

68

1

0.51

0.07

3.58

0 (0%)

52

1

0.5

0.07

3.56

1 (100%)

qPCR

68

3

5.68

1.48

19.4

1 (33%)

46

8

22.24

10.09

42.16

2 (25%)

  1. a11 individuals participated in both surveys