Skip to main content

Table 2 Protection conferred indoors and outdoors against anopheline and culicine species in all three rice farms when 1.5% transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons were fitted along the eaves of rice farm huts

From: Protecting migratory farmers in rural Tanzania using eave ribbons treated with the spatial mosquito repellent, transfluthrin

Mosquito species

Treatment

Indoors

Outdoors

Total number

Geometric mean (LCI-UCI)

% protection (LCI-UCI)

p value

Total number

Geometric mean (LCI-UCI)

% Protection (LCI-UCI)

p value

Anopheles arabiensis

Untreated

2526

9.4 (8.0–11.0)

–

< 0.001

135

1.7 (1.4–2.0)

–

0.034

1.5% transfluthrin

1131

4.8 (4.2–5.5)

56 (47–64)

80

1.3 (1.1–1.6)

38 (3–60)

Anopheles funestus

Untreated

751

3.0 (2.5–3.6)

–

0.001

21

1.2 (1.0–1.5)

–

0.413

1.5% transfluthrin

445

2.4 (2.1–2.8)

36 (16–50)

15

1.2 (1.0–1.5)

–

Culex species

Untreated

2986

7.8 (6.5–9.3)

–

< 0.001

100

2.0 (1.6–2.5)

–

0.003

1.5% transfluthrin

656

3.2 (2.8–3.7)

72 (65–77)

38

1.3 (1.1–1.5)

62 (29–80)

 

Mansonia species

Untreated

3510

12.9 (10.8–15.5)

–

< 0.001

290

2.3 (1.9–2.7)

–

0.001

 

1.5% transfluthrin

628

3.8 (3.2–4.4)

80 (75–85)

150

1.8 (1.5–2.2)

49 (24–66)

  1. Each treatment arm had 48 nights of sampling. Percentage protective efficacy is estimated for each treatment relative to the respective controls
  2. LCI lower confidence interval, UCI upper confidence interval, p value Walds p value