Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Malaria Journal

Fig. 3

From: Evaluation of human-baited double net trap and human-odour-baited CDC light trap for outdoor host-seeking malaria vector surveillance in Kenya and Ethiopia

Fig. 3

Correlation and density-dependence of the alternative outdoor trapping methods relative to human landing catch for catching Anopheles mosquitoes in Bulbul, southwestern Ethiopia [Correlation of human-odour-baited CDC light trap (a), human-baited double net trap (b) and unbaited CDC light trap (c) with human landing catch. The sampling efficiency (RSE) of human-odour-baited CDC light trap (d), human-baited double net trap (e) and unbaited CDC light trap (f) relative to human landing catch]. ALT represents alternative traps

Back to article page