Table 4 Performance of uRDT and cRDT against qPCR. RECIPAL study, 2014–2017
PCR | Value (95%CI)a | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(+) | (−) | Total | Sensitivityb | Specificityb | PPV | NPV | Positive LR | Negative LR | |
cRDT | |||||||||
(+) | 76 | 33 | 109 | 44.2% | 95.7% | 69.7% | 88.5% | 10.3 | 0.6 |
(−) | 96 | 737 | 833 | (36.6–51.9) | (94.0–97.0) | (60.2–78.2) | (86.2–90.6) | (7.1–15) | (0.5–0.7) |
uRDT | |||||||||
(+) | 104 | 49 | 153 | 60.5% | 93.6% | 68.0% | 91.4% | 9.5 | 0.4 |
(−) | 68 | 721 | 789 | (52.7–67.8) | (91.7–95.3) | (60.0–75.3) | (89.2–93.2) | (7.1–12.8) | (0.3–0.5) |