Skip to main content

Table 4 Variance component analysis of differences between countries, LLIN brands and survey periods in factors contributing to durability

From: Attrition, physical integrity and insecticidal activity of long-lasting insecticidal nets in sub-Saharan Africa and modelling of their impact on vectorial capacity

 

Source of variation

Country

LLIN brand

Time period

Country: time period interaction

LLIN brand: time period interaction

Survival of LLINsa

 σ2

1.1 (0*–3.2)

0.2 (0*–0.6)

2.8 (0*–6.7)

2.2 (0.6–3.8)

0.4 (0*–0.8)

 %Total

14.6

3.2

36.0

27.9

5.2

Use of extant LLINsa

 σ2

15.6 (0*–35.8)

3.6 (0*–8.3)

0.5 (0*–2.4)

1.4 (0*–4.2)

0.0 (0*–0.0)

 %Total

47.3

10.8

1.4

4.3

0*

Original cohort LLINs in usea

 σ2

10.7 (0*–25.2)

3.2 (0*–7.4)

6.6 (0*–15.2)

2.0 (0*–5.1)

0* (0.0–0.0)

 %Total

33.0

9.8

20.3

6.2

0*

Mean of Logarithm of holed area

 σ2

0.7 (0*–1.6)

0.4 (0*–0.9)

1.7 (0*–3.6)

0.0 (0*–0.1)

0.0 (0*–0.1)

 %Total

21.5

12.3

52.6

1.1

1

  1. σ2: Estimate of variance component (95% confidence intervals); %Total is the percentage of the total variance in the outcome
  2. *The REML algorithm constrains the estimates of variance components to be positive. Values of zero are substituted where the algorithm did not converge on a positive value
  3. aProportions analysed on a logit scale