Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the effects of the treatment interventions on adult mosquito density in the sampled villages in Malindi, Nyabondo and Tolay study sites using generalized estimating equations

From: Evaluating the impact of larviciding with Bti and community education and mobilization as supplementary integrated vector management interventions for malaria control in Kenya and Ethiopia

Interventions

Overall

Year 1: 2013

Year 2: 2014

Year 3: 2015

DR, p-value

DR, p-value

DR, p-value

DR, p-value

Adult anopheline mosquito density

Overall

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

1.78 (1.25–2.55), p = 0.002

1.03 (0.39–2.70), p = 0.955

1.13 (0.66–1.96), p = 0.654

3.24 (1.79–5.85), p < 0.001

 Arm 3

0.88 (0.58–1.34), p = 0.561

0.78 (0.27–2.24), p = 0.639

0.98 (0.56–1.72), p = 0.949

0.76 (0.35–1.66), p = 0.493

 Arm 4

0.55 (0.34–0.88), p = 0.012

0.82 (0.31–2.13), p = 0.678

0.62 (0.33–1.19), p = 0.150

0.24 (0.07–0.77), p = 0.016

Malindi

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

2.36 (1.51–3.71), p < 0.001

0.51 (0.13–2.05), p = 0.346

1.19 (0.60–2.37), p = 0.611

6.17 (2.71–14.06), p < 0.001

 Arm 3

0.86 (0.49–1.49), p = 0.582

0.24 (0.04–1.38), p = 0.109

0.77 (0.37–1.60), p = 0.479

2.00 (0.72–5.57), p = 0.182

 Arm 4

0.69 (0.38–1.25), p = 0.224

0.79 (0.23–2.68), p = 0.704

0.69 (0.32–1.48), p = 0.342

0.42 (0.08–2.33), p = 0.320

Nyabondo

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

1.93 (0.72–5.13), p = 0.189

10.58 (0.25–450.16), p = 0.218

5.04 (0.92–27.64), p = 0.063

0.13 (0.01–2.01), p = 0.146

 Arm 3

2.10 (0.79–5.54), p = 0.135

8.98 (0.20–409.40), p = 0.260

5.98 (1.11–32.11), p = 0.037

0.13 (0.01–2.01), p = 0.146

 Arm 4

0.80 (0.25–2.54), p = 0.705

4.62 (0.10–211.94), p = 0.433

1.69 (0.24–12.08), p = 0.602

0.16 (0.01–1.97), p = 0.151

Tolay

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

0.44 (0.15–1.30), p = 0.136

1.10 (0.15–7.84), p = 0.924

0.25 (0.04–1.61), p = 0.143

0.38 (0.05–3.04), p = 0.361

 Arm 3

0.51 (0.18–1.43), p = 0.201

1.15 (0.16–8.04), p = 0.888

0.40 (0.08–1.94), p = 0.256

0.32 (0.04–2.92), p = 0.313

 Arm 4

0.29 (0.08–1.05), p = 0.059

0.60 (0.06–6.02), p = 0.664

0.16 (0.01–1.71), p = 0.129

0.32 (0.04–2.92), p = 0.313

Adult culicine mosquito density

Overall

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

0.69 (0.53–0.89), p = 0.004

0.24 (0.14–0.40), p < 0.001

1.35 (0.85–2.15), p = 0.199

1.03 (0.67–1.60), p = 0.879

 Arm 3

0.49 (0.37–0.65), p < 0.001

0.32 (0.20–0.52), p < 0.001

0.52 (0.29–0.92), p = 0.026

0.80 (0.50–1.29), p = 0.366

 Arm 4

0.38 (0.28–0.51), p < 0.001

0.30 (0.19–0.47), p < 0.001

0.40 (0.21–0.77), p = 0.006

0.37 (0.21–0.68), p = 0.001

Malindi

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

0.71 (0.51–0.98), p = 0.037

0.13 (0.06–0.28), p < 0.001

1.60 (0.94–2.71), p = 0.081

1.14 (0.64–2.04), p = 0.652

 Arm 3

0.51 (0.36–0.73), p < 0.001

0.26 (0.13–0.49), p < 0.001

0.48 (0.24–0.94), p = 0.032

1.29 (0.67–2.49), p = 0.440

 Arm 4

0.22 (0.14–0.35), P < 0.001

0.09 (0.04–0.21), p < 0.001

0.25 (0.11–0.59), p = 0.001

0.65 (0.29–1.45), p = 0.288

Nyabondo

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

0.85 (0.38–1.89), p = 0.684

0.98 (0.37–2.62), p = 0.973

10.31 (0.02–6705.85), p = 0.480

0.36 (0.06–2.30), p = 0.282

 Arm 3

0.55 (0.22–1.37), p = 0.199

0.36 (0.09–1.46), p = 0.153

3.75 (0–3846.25), p = 0.709

0.96 (0.24–3.80), p = 0.949

 Arm 4

2.06 (1.06–3.99), p = 0.033

1.73 (0.76–3.95), p = 0.191

37.00 (0.07–19,853.62), p = 0.260

0.64 (0.14–2.96), p = 0.566

Tolay

 Arm 1

Reference

   

 Arm 2

0.95 (0.40–2.26), p = 0.912

0.68 (0.09–5.01), p = 0.705

0.79 (0.13–4.65), p = 0.795

1.11 (0.35–3.56), p = 0.856

 Arm 3

0.79 (0.32–1.95), p = 0.605

0.64 (0.08–4.88), p = 0.667

1.24 (0.25–6.09), p = 0.793

0.62 (0.16–2.36), p = 0.484

 Arm 4

0.67 (0.26–1.76), p = 0.420

1.24 (0.22–6.94), p = 0.807

0.90 (0.15–5.33), p = 0.911

0.32 (0.06–1.66), p = 0.174

  1. DR: Density ratio was calculated using generalized estimating equations taking into account the study randomization, it was used to show the intervention effect on adult vector density
  2. Arm 1 referred to LLINs only; Arm 2 combination of LLINs and Bti; Arm 3 combination of LLINs and CEM; and Arm 4 combination of LLINs, Bti, and CEM