Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of microscopy, Pf RDT and HSPf RDT compared to PCR as gold standard

From: Performance evaluation of the highly sensitive histidine‐rich protein 2 rapid test for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in North-West Tanzania

 

PCR Positive (n = 171)

PCR negative (n = 225)

Sensitivity % (CI95)

Specificity %(CI95)

PPV% (CI95)

NPV% (CI95)

Microscopy

 Positive (n = 87)

70

17

40.0 (32.6–47.7)

92.4 (88.0–95.5)

80.5 (70.6–88.2)

66.1 (60.6–71.4)

 Negative (n = 310)

105

205

Pf RDT

 Positive (n = 110)

99

11

56.5 (48.8–64.0)

95.0 (91.3–97.5)

90.0

(82.8–94.9)

73.5 (68.0–78.5)

 Negative (n = 287)

76

211

HSPf RDT

 Positive (n = 132)

117

15

69.9 (59.3–73.8)

93.2 (89.1–96.2)

88.6 (82–93.5)

78.1 (72.6–82.9)

 Negative (n = 265)

58

207

  1. PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI95 95% confidence interval