Skip to main content

Table 1 Hut entry of An. culicifacies in treated and untreated arms with the results of negative binomial regression analysis

From: Evaluation of DawaPlus 3.0 and DawaPlus 4.0, deltamethrin–PBO combination nets against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles culicifacies in experimental huts in India

Experiment armsNumber of collectionsNumber entered (entry)aRangeMean entry ± SEIncidence rate ratio (IRR)95% CIp
Untreated polyester net (negative control)422640–166.28 ± 0.071.00b  
Unwashed DawaPlus 2.0 (positive control)42170–10.40 ± 0.090.0640.038–0.1070.000
DawaPlus 2.0 washed 20 times (positive control)42310–30.73 ± 0.080.1170.078–0.1750.000
Unwashed DawaPlus 3.042100–10.24 ± 0.110.0370.019–0.0720.000
DawaPlus 3.0 washed 20 times42190–20.45 ± 0.100.0710.044–0.1170.000
Unwashed DawaPlus 4.042120–10.29 ± 0.120.0450.025–0.0820.000
DawaPlus 4.0 washed 20 times42210–20.50 ± 0.520.0790.049–0.1270.000
  1. aOut of the total 42 collections in each arm; SE standard error
  2. bUntreated polyester net (negative control) was used as reference category for the analysis