Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimated unadjusted (left columns) and adjusted (right columns) risk ratios of LLIN use from log binomial regression modeling

From: Malaria prevalence and long-lasting insecticidal net use in rural western Uganda: results of a cross-sectional survey conducted in an area of highly variable malaria transmission intensity

Variable RR 95% CI p-value aRR 95% CI p-value
Elevation quartile
 Quartile 1   REF    REF  
 Quartile 2 1.06 1.03–1.10 < 0.001 1.07 1.03–1.11 0.02
 Quartile 3 1.01 0.97–1.04 0.73 0.97 0.93–1.02 0.23
 Quartile 4 0.86 0.83–0.89 < 0.001 0.87 0.81–0.94 < .001
Distance to clinic
 < 1 km   REF    REF  
 1–2 km 0.99 0.96–1.01 0.22 1.03 0.98–1.08 0.23
 ≥ 2 km 0.86 0.83–0.89 < 0.001 0.73 0.64–0.82 < .001
  1. Unadjusted models separately regresses LLIN use on (1) elevation quartile and (2) distance to the nearest level II of level III health centre. Adjusted model regresses LLIN use on elevation quartile and distance to the nearest level II of level III health centre
  2. CI confidence interval, km kilometre, RR risk ratio, aRR adjusted risk ratio