Table 3 The potential yield of reactive case detection using RDTs in study villages at the time of baseline surveys M0 (see also Fig. 5 illustrating the yield of reactive case detection in the GMS)
| Â | Alla | Pf | Pv | P. spp.b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Households with a RDT positive household member (#members) | 169 (773) | 124 (564) | 71 (368) | NA |
(b1) Households with a Plasmodium infected member which density reported which had > 1 HH member residing in the HH (#all members) | 135 (669) | 80 (401) | 58 (325) | 34 (213) |
(b2) Households with a Plasmodium infected member which density reported which had > 1 household member residing in the household (#member excluded 1 index case from each household) | 135 (534) | 80 (321) | 58 (267) | 34 (179) |
 2 to 3 household members residing in the household (#all member) | 37 (96) | 21 (54) | 13 (35) | 4 (11) |
 4 to 5 household members residing in the household (#all member) | 59 (269) | 34 (155) | 23 (105) | 15 (64) |
 ≥ 6 household members residing in the household (#all member) | 39 (304) | 25 (192) | 22 (185) | 15 (138) |
(c) Households with a second case PCR detectable Plasmodium infection (#non-index asymptomatic cases) | 6 (10) | 2 (4) | 4 (4) | NA |
(d) Households with second case RDT detectable Plasmodium infection (#non-index asymptomatic cases) | 3 (5) | 1 (3) | 2 (2) | NA |
(e) Yield PCR; n/N, % (95% CI) | 10/534, 1.9% (0.9 to 3.4) | 4/534, 0.7% (0.2 to 1.9%) | 4/534, 0.7% (0.2 to 1.9%) | NA |
(f) Yield RDT; n/N, % (95% CI) | 5/534, 0.9% (0.3 to 2.2) | 3/534, 0.6% (0.1 to 1.6%) | 2/534, 0.4% (0.05 to 1.6%) | Â |