From: Insecticide-treated eave ribbons for malaria vector control in low-income communities
Attributes | Challenges associated with standard IRS practices | Potential of insecticide- eave ribbons to address the IRS-related challenges |
---|---|---|
Quantities of chemicals | Large quantities of chemicals may be needed to treat all indoor surfaces | Significantly reduced quantities of chemicals will be required to treat the ribbons [36] |
Spraying operations | Requires removal of household belongings before spraying; this slows down operations and can limit acceptability | Will not require removal of household belongings, thus can be done rapidly and at scale |
Implementation teams | Implementation requires large team of well-trained personnel | Implementation can be done by individuals and does not require spray teams |
Scalability | Difficult to achieve large-scale coverage across regions or countries because of costs and logistical challenges | Wider coverage can be obtained once supply chain is established |
Mosquitoes targeted | Targets mosquitoes spread out on indoor resting surfaces | Target mosquitoes at specific points of entry [37] |
Target surface | IRS monitoring is sub-optimal given differences in substrates on people’s walls; varied indoor resting behaviours of mosquitoes [60], and post-spraying changes on sprayed surfaces [61] | Monitoring can be standardized since the treatment substrate is standardizable |