Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of reported lesu use and outcomes of interest

From: Permethrin-treated baby wraps for the prevention of malaria: results of a randomized controlled pilot study in rural Uganda

 

Control group

Intervention group

 

N = 26

N = 24

Safety outcomes

  

Adverse events (n, %)

  

Child

0 (0)

1 (4.2)

Mother

0 (0)

0 (0)

Feasibility

  

Attendance (n, %)

  

Median number of follow-up visits (IQR)

6 (6–6)

6 (5–6)

Completed both re-treatments

25 (96.2)

21 (87.5)

Completed exit Interview

26 (100.0)

21 (87.5)

Completed all visits

25 (96.2)

18 (75.0)

Acceptability and use

  

Daily use of lesu (n, %)

  

Carry child on back

26 (100.0)

21 (100.0)*

Blanket/swaddle for sleep

6 (23.1)

11 (52.4)*

Blanket for sitting

0 (0)

0 (0)

Washing (median, IQR)

  

Reported washes per 2-week period

4.0 (2.3–6.0)

4.0 (3.0–6.0)

Satisfaction (n, %)

  

Would recommend lesu to others

26 (100.0)

21 (100.0)*

Would be willing to pay more for lesu

26 (100.0)

21 (100.0)*

Exploratory outcomes

  

Illness (events per 100 person-weeks, 95% CI)

  

Fever

7.0 (4.2–11.1)

8.1 (5.0–12.4)

Care seeking for any cause

17.0 (12.5–22.7)

16.8 (12.1–22.7)

Malaria treatment received

3.0 (1.3–5.8)

6.0 (3.4–9.9)

Malaria testing

  

Incident RDT positives (n)

5

5

RDT positive prevalence (%)

10.7

8.4

PCR Positive (n)

2

0 (0)

Change growth measuresa (median, IQR)

  

Change in weight (kg)

0.9 (0.5–1.3)

0.6 (0.4–0.9)

Change in MUAC (cm)

− 0.85 (− 1.2–0.3)

0.2 (− 0.2–0.7)

Change in Hb (g/dL)

0.88 (0.5–1.3)

0.78 (0.3–1.2)

  1. Hb haemoglobin, IQR  interquartile range, MUAC  mid-upper arm circumference, RDT  rapid diagnostic test
  2. aChange computed as 12-week measure minus baseline measure
  3. *Three participants lost to follow-up did not complete exit interview