Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, segregated by gender

From: Implementation of community case management of malaria in malaria endemic counties of western Kenya: are community health volunteers up to the task in diagnosing malaria?

Characteristic

Malaria cases (Pos vs Neg)

CHV vs microscopy

MLT vs microscopy

PE %

(95% CI)

PE %

(95% CI)

Overall

 Sensitivity

91.1

(82.6, 96.4)

91.6

(83.4, 96.5)

 Specificity

88.8

(81.6, 93.9)

91.2

(84.5, 95.7)

 Positive predictive value

84.7

(75.3, 91.6)

88.4

(79.7, 94.3)

 Negative predictive value

93.6

(87.3, 97.4)

93.7

(87.4, 97.4)

Male

 Sensitivity

85

(62.1, 96.8)

86.4

(65.1, 97.1)

 Specificity

91.2

(76.3, 98.1)

94.1

(80.3, 99.3)

 Positive predictive value

85

(62.1, 96.8)

90.5

(69.6, 98.8)

 Negative predictive value

91.2

(76.3, 98.1)

91.4

(76.9, 98.2)

Female

 Sensitivity

93.2

(83.5, 98.1)

93.4

(84.1, 98.2)

 Specificity

87.8

(78.7, 94)

90

(81.2, 95.6)

 Positive predictive value

84.6

(73.5, 92.4)

87.7

(77.2, 94.5)

 Negative predictive value

94.7

(87.1, 98.5)

94.7

(87.1, 98.5)

  1. PE point estimate; CHV interpretation by community health volunteer; Microscopy findings from the laboratory; MLT interpretation by medical laboratory technician