Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of HCPs failures proportion and 95% CIs by tool and SP methodologies in the correct management of suspected malaria

From: Development and validation of an online tool for assessment of health care providers’ management of suspected malaria in an area, where transmission has been interrupted

Methodologies for assessment HCPs

 

Comparison of SP and tool

(within and between groups)

P-value

Comparison of tool with itself

(between groups A and B)

P-value

Group A (n = 180)

   

 SP before

p1:

155 (86.1%; 80.1–90.8)

p1 with p3:

0.624*

p2 with p:

0.688**

 Tool after

p3:

157 (87.2%; 81.4–91.7)

Group B

(n = 180)

  

 Tool only

p2:

154 (85.6%; 79.5–90.3)

p1 with p2:

0.535**

  1. HCPs Healthcare providers; p1, p2, and p3 failures Proportion; p1 with p2 between groups A and B comparison of SP and tool; p1 with p3 within group (A) comparison of SP and tool; (sensitivity of tool in comparison with SP); p2 with p3 Between group comparison of tool (with itself); the difference incurred by performing tool one month after SP
  2. *Fisher’s exact test
  3. **Chi-square (χ2)
Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us