Skip to main content

Table 9 Trim and fill analysis

From: Which trap is best? Alternatives to outdoor human landing catches for malaria vector surveillance: a meta-analysis

 

Hedge’s g

95% confidence interval

Τ2

I2

Random effects model

0.5506

[− 0.5077, 1.6088]

19.9866

98.7%

Prediction interval

 

[− 8.4165, 9.5176]

  
  1. A total of 19 studies were added to compensate for the possible funnel plot asymmetries. The additional studies show that the pooled effect is underestimated in the original meta-analysis
Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us