Skip to main content

Table 3 Age group wise prevalence of malaria and low-density infection in active fever surveillance diagnosed by RDT, microscopy and PCR

From: Significance of nested PCR testing for the detection of low-density malaria infection amongst febrile patients from the Malaria Elimination Demonstration Project in Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India

Months

Fever cases screened

RDT positive (%)

Microscopy positive (%)

Gametocyte (%)

PCR positive (%)

Malaria positivea (%)

LDMI prevalenceb (%)

LDMI proportionc (%)

0–1 yr

90

4 (4.44)

4 (4.44)

2 (50.00)

8 (8.89)

8 (8.89)

4/90 (4.44)

4/8 (50.00)

1–4 yrs

543

8 (1.47)

6 (1.10)

3 (50.00)

18 (3.31)

18 (3.31)

10/543 (1.84)

10/18 (55.56)

4–8 yrs

774

9 (1.16)

8 (1.03)

2 (25.00)

21 (2.71)

21 (2.71)

10/774 (1.29)

10/21 (47.62)

8–14 yrs

1331

11 (0.83)

6 (0.45)

4 (66.66)

20 (1.50)

22 (1.65)

10/1331 (0.75)

10/22 (45.45)

15+ yrs

14,667

164 (1.12)

94 (0.64)

25 (26.59)

369 (2.52)

407 (2.77)

229/14667 (1.56)

229/407 (56.27)

Total

17,405

196 (1.13)

118 (0.68)

36 (30.50)

436 (2.50)

476 (2.73)

263/17405 (1.51)

263/476 (55.25)

  1. aTotal malaria positive by either or any diagnostic method i.e., RDT, microscopy or PCR
  2. bLow density malaria infection/Fever cases screened
  3. cLow density malaria infection/total malaria positive