Characteristic | Provider choice for recent fever | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public sector | Semi-private | Outside | ||||
RRR | (95% CI) | RRR | (95% CI) | RRR | (95% CI) | |
Age a | 0.97b | (0.94–1.00) | 0.98 | (0.95–1.01) | 0.98 | (0.96–1.00) |
Gender | ||||||
 Female | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |
 Male | 1.16 | (0.42–3.22) | 0.3 | (0.09–1.03) | 1.15 | (0.58–2.29) |
Socio-economic quintile | ||||||
 Poorest quintile | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |
 2nd poorest quintile | 1.17 | (0.21–6.70) | 0.31 | (0.03–3.63) | 2.17 | (0.76–6.15) |
 Middle quintile | 4.77 | (0.91–25.16) | 1.85 | (0.33–10.34) | 1.96 | (0.77–5.01) |
 2nd richest quintile | 12.85c | (1.93–85.41) | 17.93c | (2.77–116.05) | 8.39c | (2.54–27.76) |
 Richest quintile | 3.24 | (0.28–38.11) | 3.94 | (0.34–46.12) | 4.81 | (0.62–37.31) |
Access to no. of providers in the village | ||||||
 Access to 1–3 providers | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |
 Access to ≥ 4 providers | 30.27c | (6.13–149.41) | 1.54c | (2.78–47.88) | 0.48 | (0.22–1.07) |
Malaria transmission | ||||||
 Having incorrect knowledge | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |
 Having correct knowledge | 0.36 | (0.09–1.40) | 0.17b | (0.04–0.70) | 1.35 | (0.54–3.36) |
 Constant | 0.06b | (0.01–0.51) | 0.27 |  | 0.66 | (0.21–2.05) |
Multivariable Multinomial Logistic Regression model investigating predictors of different choice of providers among forest goers in past febrile illness that occur in the village and forest | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Provider choice for fever in village | Provider choice for fever in forest | ||||||||||
Public | Semi-private | Outside | Public | Semi-private | Outside | |||||||
RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | |
Age a | 1.02 | (0.99–1.05) | 1.04b | (1.01–1.07) | 1.01 | (0.98–1.03) | 1.03 | (0.99–1.06) | 1.03b | (1.00–1.07) | 1.01 | (0.99–1.04) |
Gender | ||||||||||||
 Female | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
 Male | 1.24 | (0.38–4.06) | 3.92 | (0.80–19.17) | 0.55 | (0.27–1.12) | 1.03 | (0.32–3.30) | 7.06 | (0.88–56.51) | 0.76 | (0.37–1.57) |
Socio-economic quintile | ||||||||||||
 Poorest quintile | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
 2nd poorest quintile | 2.84 | (0.86–9.36) | 2.03 | (0.51–8.00) | 1.99 | (0.88–4.52) | 5.19b | (1.28–21.04) | 2.06 | (0.59–7.18) | 2.06 | (0.91–4.65) |
 Middle quintile | 0.94 | (0.26–3.46) | 2.2 | (0.62–7.82) | 1.64 | (0.74–3.61) | 1.89 | (0.44–8.14) | 1.79 | (0.55–5.91) | 1.71 | (0.78–3.75) |
 2nd richest quintile | 4.21b | (1.20–14.82) | 6.35c | (1.71–23.56) | 4.71c | (1.95–11.37) | 7.57c | (1.76–32.60) | 5.00b | (1.43–17.52) | 5.36c | (2.25–12.76) |
 Richest quintile | 20.21c | (3.05–133.88) | 6.66 | (0.69–64.54) | 2.77 | (0.22–34.70) | 37.18c | (4.83–286.02) | 2.99 | (0.22–40.64) | 2.27 | (0.19–27.83) |
Access to no. of providers in the village | ||||||||||||
 Access to 1–3 providers | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
 Access to ≥ 4 providers | 5.43c | (2.36–12.51) | 5.45c | (2.31–12.87) | 0.18c | (0.06–0.54) | 6.00c | (2.56–14.09) | 3.45c | (1.45–8.18) | 0.41b | (0.17–0.95) |
Education of main income earner | ||||||||||||
 Illiterate or primary education | As reference |  |  | |||||||||
 Secondary and above education | 2.89b | (1.27–6.57) | 1.77 | (0.76–4.12) | 1.56 | (0.86–2.84) | 3.39c | (1.44–7.96) | 1.78 | (0.77–4.12) | 1.61 | (0.89–2.91) |
 Constant | 0.00c | (0.00–0.06) | 0.00c | (0.00–0.02) | 0.21 | (0.04–1.09) | 0.00c | (0.00–0.03) | 0.00c | (0.00–0.03) | 0.11c | (0.02–0.57) |
Multivariable Multinomial Logistic Regression model investigating predictors of different choice of providers among forest goers for RDT testing in past febrile illness that occured in the village and forest | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Provider choice for m-RDT testing in village | Provider choice for m-RDT testing in forest | ||||||
Non-CHW/CHV | Outside | Non-CHW/CHV | Outside | |||||
RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | RRR | 95%CI | |
Age a | 1.02 | (0.99–1.05) | 1.01 | (0.99–1.04) | 1.01 | (0.98–1.04) | 1.01 | (0.98–1.04) |
Gender | ||||||||
 Female | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 Male | 2.05 | (0.68–6.18) | 1.52 | (0.61–3.76) | 1.91 | (0.58–6.29) | 1.62 | (0.61–4.25) |
Socio-economic quintile | ||||||||
 Poorest quintile | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 2nd poorest quintile | 1.99 | (0.65–6.06) | 0.74 | (0.30–1.84) | 1.65 | (0.53–5.08) | 0.8 | (0.32–2.01) |
 Middle quintile | 1.51 | (0.51–4.45) | 0.54 | (0.22–1.32) | 1.15 | (0.38–3.49) | 0.54 | (0.21–1.37) |
 2nd richest quintile | 4.55c | (1.55–13.37) | 2.46b | (1.07–5.67) | 4.28b | (1.44–12.66) | 2.85b | (1.22–6.69) |
 Richest quintile | 9.92c | (1.81–54.51) | 3.51 | (0.61–20.11) | 9.81b | (1.79–53.70) | 3.64 | (0.63–20.92) |
Access to no. of providers in the village | ||||||||
 Access to 1–3 providers | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 Access to ≥ 4 providers | 4.68c | (2.22–9.89) | 1.23 | (0.61–2.51) | 4.19c | (1.94–9.06) | 1.36 | (0.66–2.79) |
Malaria prevention | ||||||||
 Having incorrect Knowledge | As reference |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 Having correct Knowledge | 0.39b | (0.18–0.87) | 0.56 | (0.28–1.10) | 0.41b | (0.18–0.94) | 0.68 | (0.35–1.34) |
 Constant | 0.02c | (0.00–0.16) | 0.16b | (0.03–0.70) | 0.04 | (0.01–0.29) | 0.12 | (0.03–0.59) |