Diagnostic method | Approach | Members distinguished | Advantages | Limitations | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCR-RFLP-1 | PCR primers developed from An. funestus D3 region of 28S ribosomal gene amplified and digested using restriction endonuclease HpaII | An. funestus and An. vaneedeni | Ability to distinguish two morphologically similar species | Limited to only two members of the An. funestus group Minimal sequence variation between the two species poses the challenge of specificity when other members are added to the assay Post PCR processing | [48] |
Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) PCR | PCR primers developed from An. funestus D3 region of 28S ribosomal gene amplified and separated based on DNA conformation on SSCP gels | An. funestus, An. vaneedeni, An. rivulorum, and An. leesoni | Ability to distinguish four members of the An. funestus group Can distinguish east from West African An. funestus | Overlap on the denatured single strand (DSS) banding patterns for An. funestus and An. vaneedeni Post PCR processing | [49] |
Internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) | PCR amplification using internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region primers | An. funestus and An. rivulorum | Differentiating two sympatric vectors in the An. funestus group | Limited to only two members within the group Post PCR processing | [50] |
ITS2 Cocktail PCR | Â | An. funestus, An. rivulorum, An. vaneedeni, An. leesoni, An. parensis, and An. rivulorum-like | Simultaneous identification of six members within the group in a single PCR run | Post PCR processing | |
PCR–RFLP-2 | PCR amplification using AFG multiplex PCR assay followed by EcoRI RFLP digestion | An. funestus, An. funestus-like, An. parensis, Anopheles rivulorum, An. vaneedeni, An. leesoni, and An. longipalpis-type C | Identification of An. longipalpis-type C from the other members of the AFG | Post PCR processing and requirement of enzyme digestion | [128] |