Cluster number | Ibadan metro area | Perceptions of ward characteristics per cluster in Ibadan | Kano metro area | Perceptions of ward characteristics per cluster in Kano |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Owode, Olopomewa | Olopomewa and Owode exhibited significant differences. Olopomewa had tarred roads and high-quality housing. Roads in Owode were untarred and had lower-quality housing | Dorayi, Goron Dutse | Both Dorayi and Goron Dutse were densely populated and had a mix of low- and high-quality housing. Both wards appeared to be undergoing redevelopments |
2 | Challenge, Basorun, Asanke | Environmental characteristics were roughly similar in Challenge, Basorun and Asanke. Roads were mostly untarred and housing infrastructure was aged | Fagge D2, Kwachiri | Fagge D2 and Kwachiri were dissimilar. Kwachiri was described as a commercial hub with very few residential houses. Fagge D2 was a densely populated residential ward with medium to poor quality housing |
3 | Ode Aje, Agugu | Residents’ socio-economic status and environmental characteristics in Ode Aje and Agugu were observed as roughly similar. Residents were perceived to be of low-income, wards were densely populated, and roads were untarred | Tudun Wazurchi, Sani Mainagge | Tudun Wazruchi and Sani Mainagge were perceived to be dissimilar. Housing quality was of poor to medium quality in Tudun Wazurchi and of higher quality in Sani Mainagge |
4 | Bashorun | Only one ward was visited in this cluster. Bashorun had good road network and the socio-economic status of residents was perceived to be high | Gobirawa, Kofar Ruwa | Gobirawa was found to be densely populated ward with medium to low quality housing and untarred street roads. Kofar Ruwa was a commercial hub with few residential areas |
5 | Â | Â | Zango, Shahuchi | Both Zango and Shahuchi have varied housing quality ranging from high to poor quality. Zango appeared to have more areas where gutters were filled with rubbish |