Table 2 Association between trap type, light quality and mosquito catch during field evaluation
| Â | Means (95% CI) | Rate ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Mean (95% CI) | Rate ratio (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Indoors | Outdoors | ||||
| Â | An. funestus s.l | |||||
Trap type | Â | Â | Â | |||
 CDC | 8.3 (5.8–11.7) | 1 |  | 2.2 (1.4–3.3) | 1 |  |
 SB | 9.1 (6.0–13.9) | 1.1 (0.8–1.6) | 0.709 | 3.6 (2.1–6.2) | 1.6 (0.8–3.3) | 0.229 |
Light quality | Â | Â | Â | |||
 White | 8.7 (6.1–12.3) | 1 |  | 2.3 (1.5–3.4) | 1 |  |
 UV | 21.8 (17.5–27.1) | 2.5 (1.7–3.8) |  < 0.001 | 3.6 (2.0–6.2) | 1.6 (0.8–3.1) | 0.294 |
| Â | An. gambiae s.l | |||||
Trap type | Â | Â | Â | |||
 CDC | 5.6 (3.9–8.0) | 1 |  | 1.5 (1.0–2.2) | 1 |  |
 SB | 5.3 (3.8–7.4) | 0.9 (0.6–1.3) | 0.811 | 2.5 (1.5–4.1) | 1.7 (0.9–3.1) | 0.126 |
Light quality | Â | Â | Â | |||
 White | 5.4 (4.0–7.3) | 1 |  | 1.7 (1.2–2.4) | 1 |  |
 UV | 13.7 (10.9–17.1) | 2.5 (1.7–3.6) |  < 0.001 | 2.3 (1.4–3.9) | 1.4 (0.7–2.6) | 0.346 |
| Â | Other Anopheles | |||||
Trap type | Â | Â | Â | |||
 CDC | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | 1 |  | 2.3 (1.7–3.1) | 1 |  |
 SB | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.4 (0.1–2.4) | 0.619 | 1.8 (1.1–2.9) | 0.8 (0.4–1.4) | 0.351 |
Light quality | Â | Â | Â | |||
 White | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | 1 |  | 1.9 (1.2–3.1) | 1 |  |
 UV | 0.4 (0.2–0.7) | 0.6 (0.1–2.9) | 0.281 | 2.1 (1.5–2.9) | 1.1 (0.6–1.9) | 0.887 |
| Â | Culicines (Culex, Aedes, Mansonia) | |||||
Trap type | Â | Â | Â | |||
 CDC | 5.7 (4.7–7.0) | 1 |  | 12.0 (8.3–17.3) | 1 |  |
 SB | 5.8 (4.4–7.7) | 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | 0.807 | 11.9 (7.9–18.1) | 0.9 (0.6–1.7) | 0.963 |
Light quality | Â | Â | Â | |||
 White | 4.1 (3.0–5.5) | 1 |  | 12.3 (7.8–19.3) | 1 |  |
 UV | 7.5 (6.2–9.0) | 1.8 (1.3–2.6) |  < 0.001 | 11.6 (8.5–15.9) | 0.9 (0.5–1.6) | 0.773 |