Table 3 Number and percentage of Treatment Units (TUs: 10 × 10 m grid squares inundated with water) and Anopheles positive TUs missed by the SIS and conventional mapping approaches, summarized by habitat type
From: Cost and quality of operational larviciding using drones and smartphone technology
Type | TUs | Anopheline positive TUs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTS | SISs % | Conv % | GTS | SIS % | Conv % | |
Agriculture | 22 | 4 (18) | 6 (27) | 2 | 0 (0) | 2 (100) |
Construction | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | – | – | – |
Fringe | 6 | 4 (67) | 3 (50) | – | – | – |
Home | 17 | 3 (18) | 0 (0) | – | – | – |
Isolate pond | 22 | 14 (64) | 6 (27) | – | – | – |
Rice paddy | 73 | 71 (97) | 57 (78) | 11 | 10 (91) | 5 (45) |
Swamp | 10 | 10 (100) | 6 (60) | 2 | 2 (100) | 2 (100) |
Vehicle/walking track | 29 | 19 (66) | 8 (28) | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 (0) |