Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Malaria Journal

Fig. 1

From: Key considerations, target product profiles, and research gaps in the application of infrared spectroscopy and artificial intelligence for malaria surveillance and diagnosis

Fig. 1

Applicability, strengths, and weaknesses of current methods used to measure key malaria indicators. Panel A compares the three most common methods for parasitological assessment [51, 64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] while panel B compares the three main methods for entomological assessment [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83], on a proportion score of 1–100. These scores are based on expert opinion of the authors of this article

Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us