Reduction in host-finding behaviour in fungus-infected mosquitoes is correlated with reduction in olfactory receptor neuron responsiveness
© George et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 May 2011
Accepted: 3 August 2011
Published: 3 August 2011
Chemical insecticides against mosquitoes are a major component of malaria control worldwide. Fungal entomopathogens formulated as biopesticides and applied as insecticide residual sprays could augment current control strategies and mitigate the evolution of resistance to chemical-based insecticides.
Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were exposed to Beauveria bassiana or Metarhizium acridum fungal spores and sub-lethal effects of exposure to fungal infection were studied, especially the potential for reductions in feeding and host location behaviours related to olfaction. Electrophysiological techniques, such as electroantennogram, electropalpogram and single sensillum recording techniques were then employed to investigate how fungal exposure affected the olfactory responses in mosquitoes.
Exposure to B. bassiana caused significant mortality and reduced the propensity of mosquitoes to respond and fly to a feeding stimulus. Exposure to M. acridum spores induced a similar decline in feeding propensity, albeit more slowly than B. bassiana exposure. Reduced host-seeking responses following fungal exposure corresponded to reduced olfactory neuron responsiveness in both antennal electroantennogram and maxillary palp electropalpogram recordings. Single cell recordings from neurons on the palps confirmed that fungal-exposed behavioural non-responders exhibited significantly impaired responsiveness of neurons tuned specifically to 1-octen-3-ol and to a lesser degree, to CO2.
Fungal infection reduces the responsiveness of mosquitoes to host odour cues, both behaviourally and neuronally. These pre-lethal effects are likely to synergize with fungal-induced mortality to further reduce the capacity of mosquito populations exposed to fungal biopesticides to transmit malaria.
Chemical insecticides targeting adult female mosquito vectors have been one of the most successful strategies employed for malaria control . However, the effectiveness and sustainability of insecticide-based interventions, such as indoor residual sprays (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), is being undermined by evolution of insecticide resistance [1–8]. Accordingly, there is now a pressing need for novel control tools including alternative, non-chemical approaches . One promising alternative is fungal entomopathogens formulated as biopesticides. A number of studies have demonstrated that residual contact with substrates treated with fungal sprays can lead to high levels of infection, reducing survival of a range of mosquito vector species, including insecticide resistant phenotypes [9–15]. Since it takes around two weeks for the malaria parasite to develop within a mosquito following a blood feed, the life-shortening effects of fungal infection can dramatically reduce malaria transmission potential [14–17]. In addition, fungal pathogens cause a range of pre- or sub-lethal effects in other arthropods including reductions in feeding [18–21], fecundity [22–26], flight performance [27, 28] and predator avoidance [29, 30], together with elevation of metabolic rate  and alteration in development . For malaria control, reductions in feeding propensity could be particularly important since the parasite can only be transmitted during a blood feed and if feeding is reduced, it does not necessarily matter whether the mosquito is alive or not. To date, fungal infection has been shown to reduce feeding in Anopheles, Culex and Aedes mosquitoes [14, 33, 34]. The proximate mechanisms associated with such changes, however, remain unexplored.
Mosquitoes have a highly developed olfactory system that uses specialized olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to detect the odours emanating from their hosts . They also use olfactory information to locate other food sources, mates, and oviposition sites. The peripheral olfactory organs that detect the olfactory cues are the antennae and maxillary palps. In Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae, maxillary palps harbour a single morphological type of chemosensory sensillum, the capitate peg, which is innervated by three ORNs. One of these three ORNs is highly responsive to CO2. The second ORN is most sensitive to 1-octen-3-ol, which is a major component of human and other vertebrate volatiles [36, 37]. In An. gambiae, this ORN expresses on its dendrites the odorant receptor (OR) called AgOR8, which is activated by 1-octen-3-ol . The third ORN is tuned to a broad panel of odorants and expresses the OR named AgOR28 on its dendrite. Furthermore, An. gambiae responds with a significant dose-dependent electropalpogram (EPG) response profile to 1-octen-3-ol [37, 38].
This study combines simple behavioural assays with electroantennogram (EAG) and electropalpogram (EPG) recordings to examine possible olfaction effects of fungal infection at the peripheral level. Single sensillum recordings (SSRs) were used to investigate individual capitate peg neuronal responses after fungal infection. Results show that in addition to survival, feeding propensity, upwind flight behaviour and the olfactory responses are all affected by fungal infection and depend on the fungal species examined. The results provide one of the first demonstrations of a pathogen having a functional impact on insect olfaction. This could have important implications for the effectiveness of fungi for vector control.
Anopheles stephensi were reared under standard insectary conditions of 27°C, 80% humidity and 12:12 light: dark photo-period. Eggs were placed in plastic trays (25 cm × 25 cm × 7 cm) filled with 1.5 l of distilled water. To reduce variation in adult size at emergence, larvae were reared at a fixed density of 400 per tray. Larvae were fed Liquifry for five days and then on Tetrafin fish flakes. From approximately two weeks after egg hatch, pupae were collected daily and placed in emergence cages. The adults that emerged were fed ad libitum on a 10% glucose solution. All experiments used three to five day old adult female mosquitoes.
Fungal isolates, formulation and application
Two species of entomopathogenic fungi were used that are known to vary in their impact on mosquitoes: Beauveria bassiana isolate IMI39150, which has been investigated in a number of previous publications and shown to have a marked impact on mosquito survival and performance [9, 10, 14, 39], and Metarhizium acridum (formerly Metarhizium anisopliae var acridum  isolate IMI330189, which is a relatively specific pathogen of grasshoppers  but has been shown to infect mosquitoes although with only moderate virulence . Both isolates were formulated separately in a mix of mineral oils (80% Isopar M:20% Ondina 22) and their concentrations adjusted to give 1 × 109 spores ml-1.
Application and mosquito exposure were as described by Bell et al . In brief, spray applications of the spore formulation were applied to the insides of waxed cardboard cups using a hand-held artist's airbrush and allowed to dry. The spray method delivers an estimated 2 × 1010 spores/m2 of which approximately 2 × 108 spores/m2 are actually deposited on the cup surface . Mosquitoes were introduced to these cups for six hours resulting in a spore acquisition in the region of 2 × 104 spores/mosquito . After exposure, mosquitoes were aspirated into mesh cages, provided with an ad libitum supply of 10% glucose, and housed in a controlled environment incubator at 26°C and 80% RH where they remained for the duration of the experiment. Control mosquitoes were handled in exactly the same way but were exposed to untreated cups. Each treatment had four replicate exposure cups per treatment with between 50 and 60 mosquitoes per replicate. After their time in the cups, mosquitoes were pooled into a single large cage according to their respective treatment, allowed to mix together and then redistributed into four replicate cages (~ 30 insects per cage) for survival assessment. Mortality was monitored daily and the trial stopped when all treated insects were dead or the trial had run for 14 days, whichever was sooner.
Three trials were run for feeding propensity and electrophysiology recordings. The first had three treatments: mosquitoes held in untreated cups ("UnExp"), or exposed to either B. bassiana-treated or M. acridum- treated cups ("Exp"). The second had two treatments: mosquitoes held in untreated cups or exposed to B. bassiana-treated cups. The third had un-exposed and B. bassiana-exposed insects and these were used for single sensillum recordings and wind tunnel flight assessments. In addition to the cages described above, a further cage (~ 120 insects) was set up for each treatment as a source of mosquitoes for SSR and flight trials.
Propensity to feed and selection of mosquitoes for electrophysiological recording
Beauveria bassiana-exposed and unexposed mosquitoes were tested for their responsiveness to a feeding stimulus each day after exposure. Metarhizium acridum-exposed mosquitoes were tested every other day because previous trials had shown very little mortality in mosquitoes exposed to this fungal pathogen (unpublished data). The feeding stimulus comprised a 250 ml flask filled with hot tap water (water temperature 35-42°C) that was covered with one of the investigator's (SB) recently worn socks. This stimulus was placed within 0.5 cm of the side of the cage holding the mosquitoes. After one minute, the number of mosquitoes that landed on the mesh cover and began probing with their mouthparts was counted; these individuals are referred to as 'responders'.
Immediately after this count was made, a set of responding mosquitoes that had not been exposed to spores was removed from their cages and designated Unexposed Responders ("UnExpR"). Responding mosquitoes that had been exposed to spores were likewise removed from their cages and designated Exposed Responders ("ExpR). Mosquitoes that had not responded to the feeding-related stimulus were also selected and designated as Unexposed Non-Responders ("UnExpNR") and Exposed Non-Responders ("ExpNR"), respectively. Mosquitoes were taken evenly from across the four replicate cages within each treatment. Mosquitoes from each of the four groups were pooled into separate cardboard cups with mesh lids and used immediately for electrophysiological readings.
Electrophysiology: EAGs, EPGs & SSR
To make a stable preparation for physiological recordings, methods similar to those established for mosquito antennal single neuron recordings were employed . A female mosquito was anaesthetized at -20°C, for 75-90 s and mounted on a microscope slide between two pieces of double-sided tape. The insect was secured in place by covering half the thorax and abdomen using tape. Its antennae or palps were fixed against the lower surface using a piece of double-sided tape stuck to a cover slip resting on a small ball of dental wax, all of which helped facilitate manipulation of the mosquito in order to fix the antennae onto the tape. The cover slip was positioned parallel to the microscope slide at right angles to the mosquito head. Once mounted, the mosquito was placed in the electrophysiological recording rig under a Nikon Optihot microscope, which provided a highly magnified (×750) view of the antennal or maxillary palp sensilla. Two tungsten microelectrodes sharpened electrolytically in 10% KNO2 at 5-10 V to a 1 μm tip diameter were used for the electrophysiological recordings. One of these, the reference electrode, was inserted into the eye or thorax of the mosquito to form an electrical ground , using a Leitz mechanical micromanipulator. The second, recording electrode was connected to the preamplifier (10 ×, Syntech, Germany) and inserted into the antennae or palps using a Narishige hydraulic micromanipulator to complete the electrical circuit and to extracellularly record the summed DC potentials of olfactory receptor neurons on the antennae (EAGs) or palps (EPGs). EAGs and EPGs were performed on the fungus-exposed or un-exposed mosquitoes from 0-8 days after inoculation by inserting a tungsten electrode into the mosquito's antennae or palps . For the M. acridum strain, EAGs were performed up to 13 days after inoculation. The preamplifier was connected to an analog-to-digital signal converter (IDAC, Syntech), which was connected to a computer for signal recording and visualization.
Single sensillum recordings were also done similarly by inserting the sharpened tungsten reference electrode into the eye and a tungsten recording electrode positioned into the base of the capitate peg sensillum on mosquito palps until electrical contact with the sensillum was established. Action potentials of the ORNs housed in the sensillum were amplified using a USB-IDAC interface amplifier (Syntech, Germany). The entire SSR recording was made only from capitate peg sensilla on mosquito palps, because this type of sensillum houses three ORNs, one that is tuned to CO2, another to 1-octen-3-ol  and third to other compounds that we did not assay. The neuronal responses of mosquitoes to 1-octen-3-ol and CO2 after exposure to fungal spores were determined by counting the number of spikes present during a 0.5 s pre-stimulus period and subtracting this background frequency from the frequency elicited during a 0.5 s post-stimulus delivery period.
Odorant stimulus delivery
The 1-octen-3-ol was dissolved in hexane at a concentration of 1 μg/μl. A 10 μl aliquot of this solution was dispensed onto a filter paper, which was then inserted into a Pasteur pipette to create an odour cartridge having 10 μg of this stimulus. A constant airflow of charcoal-purified, humidified air was passed across the antennae through a 10 mm i.d. glass tube during the experiments. The odorant was delivered into this constant air stream via the Pasteur pipette whose tip was inserted through a small hole in the glass tube, 11 cm away from its end. A stimulus flow controller (Syntech, Hilversum, Netherlands) pulsed a 40 ml/s air stream through the cartridge for 0.05 seconds, effectively delivering 2 ml of volatiles from the odour cartridge into the air stream and onto the antenna. Either DC (EAG and EPG) or AC (single-sensillum) responses to the stimulus were recorded and analysed using Syntech Autospike software (Hilversum, Netherlands). The CO2 stimuli were delivered from a certified CO2 cylinder at the rate of 200 ml/min for 0.05 seconds at a room temperature of 26°C. In single-sensillum recordings, the ORN responding to CO2 exhibited large spikes that were easily differentiated from the smaller-spiking ORN responsive to 1-octen-3-ol. Spikes were counted for each of these ORNs in the single-sensillum recordings for all stimuli.
Behavioural trials in wind tunnel
In order to further study the effect of fungal infection on mosquito flight and host-finding behaviour, we performed upwind flight trials in a wind tunnel using B. bassiana-exposed and unexposed mosquitoes from the same pools of mosquitoes that were used for SSR recordings. Mosquitoes were released into the heat-plus-odour plume in the tunnel and given a chance to fly upwind on days 2-5 after fungal exposure. The source of the plume was a 500 ml Erhlenmeyer flask filled with hot tap water (water temperature in the range of 45-50°C) and covered with one of the investigator's (JG) two-day-worn socks. The heat from the hot water provided heat cues and the worn socks provided the human volatile cues. Individual mosquitoes were placed, via a plastic transfer cup, into a 1.8 m × 0.6 m × 0.6 m acrylic glass wind tunnel, 1 m downwind of the feeding stimulus described above. The water in the flask was replaced every twenty minutes to ensure a constant temperature. Conditions in the tunnel were kept at 630 Lux light intensity at floor level 0.3 m/s wind velocity (activated charcoal filtered), 26-30°C and 50-75% RH. Ten mosquitoes were tested three times each and their upwind flight responses towards the stimulus source were recorded.
Survival was analysed with Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis in SPSS for Mac v. 18. Median lethal times were calculated (± 95% confidence interval) and differences between treatments estimated using a Log Rank Test. For the behavioural wind tunnel trials, a logit link function was fit to the data using PROC GENMOD in SAS. The model assumed a binomial distribution for upwind flight tendency. This model allowed analysis of Day post-exposure and Treatment as factors influencing the proportion of successful flights. The Day*Treatment interaction effect was computed, along with Wald chi-square tests to test differences between treatments within each day (α = 0.05). Because three trials were run per individual, the REPEATED statement was used with an exchangeable within-subject correlation matrix. EAG responses were square-root transformed to normalize the data and remove variance heterogeneity among treatments. Transformed data were analysed using analysis of variance (SAS v. 9.2). The factors considered were Day post-exposure when the measurements were made, and fungal and behavioural treatment grouping. The treatments included the responding and non-responding behaviours in the spore-exposed or unexposed groups: ExpR; ExpNR; UnExpR; and UnExpNR. The Day*Treatment interaction was also included in the model. Comparisons among the four treatments were made using the Tukey-Kramer adjustment (α = 0.05). Single-sensillum recordings were similarly analysed using ANOVA, with some minor differences. For these analyses no transformation of the data was necessary. There were only two treatment groups with respect to fungal infection, with no behavioural analyses having been performed. Also, because more replicates were performed at fewer days, it was possible to perform comparisons among the different Day*Treatment combinations. Finally, because 1-octen-3-ol was always presented first in our recordings, whereas the order of presentation of CO2 versus the blend of 1-octen-3-ol plus CO2 was varied, the effect of this difference in the order of presentation was included as a random factor when appropriate.
Mosquito survival and response to feeding-related stimuli
In trial 2, Beauveria-exposed mosquitoes again showed a higher daily mortality than control insects, with a median lethal time of 6.0 (5.79-6.21) days (LR stat = 291.8, P < 0.001) (no median lethal time could be computed for the control group because survival was 72% when the assay was censored on day 10). As in trial 1, surviving B. bassiana-exposed mosquitoes exhibited reduced responsiveness to feeding cues relative to unexposed controls with clear differences apparent by day 4 and continuing to the end of the trial (Figure 1B).
EAG and EPG responsiveness in fungal-exposed and unexposed mosquitoes
Summary of ANOVA performed in the physiological experiments, using electroantenogram (EAG), electropalpogram (EPG), or single-sensillum recording (SSR).
F = 9.34; 3,34 d.f.
p = 0.0001
F = 15.8; 2,34 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 1.92; 6,34 d.f.
p = 0.11
F = 14.8; 3,60 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 1.10; 3,60 d.f.
p = 0.36
F = 2.33; 9,60 d.f.
p = 0.0025
F = 2.32; 3,71 d.f.
p = 0.085
F = 14.5; 3,71 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 3.33; 9,71 d.f.
p = 0.0025
F = 13.6; 3,59 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 111; 2,59 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 4.41; 6,59 d.f.
p = 0.0013
F = 1.51; 3,45 d.f.
p < 0.22
F = 6.14; 2,45 d.f.
p = 0.0044
F = 0.85; 6,45 d.f.
p = 0.54
F = 19.6; 3,50 d.f. p < 0.0001),
F = 20.6; 3,50 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 4.51; 9,50 d.f.
p = 0.0002
F = 1.15; 3,45 d.f.
p = 0.34, Fig. 4C
F = 6.24; 2,45 d.f.
p = 0.0041),
F = 1.26; 6,45 d.f.
p = 0.29
F = 11.1; 3,50 d.f.
p < 0.0001).
F = 28.9; 3,50 d.f.
p < 0.0001)
F = 6.79; 9,50 d.f.
p < 0.0001).
F = 2.81; 3,45 d.f.
p = 0.05
F = 15.8; 2,45 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 1.09; 6,45 d.f.
p = 0.38
F = 13.4; 3,50 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 18.5; 3,50 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 3.26; 9,50 d.f.
p = 0.0034
F = 53.3; 1,28 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 11.9; 2,28 d.f.
p = 0.0002
F = 19.6; 2,28 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 0.03; 1,27 d.f.
p = 0.86
F = 16.1; 2,27 d.f.
p < 0.0001
F = 7.56; 2,27 d.f.
p = 0.0025
F = 2.08; 1,27 d.f.
p = 0.16
F = 10.5; 1,27 d.f.
p = 0.0032
F = 7.35; 2,27 d.f.
p = 0.0028
F = 1.72; 2,27 d.f.
p = 0.20
F = 1.00; 1,27 d.f.
p = 0.33
F = 1.14; 1,27 d.f.
p = 0.29
F = 11.8; 2,27 d.f.
p = 0.0002
F = 0.23; 2,27 d.f.
p = 0.80
F = 3.70; 1,27 d.f.
p = 0.065
Reduced EAG amplitudes in response to 1-octen-3-ol were not seen in mosquitoes exposed to M. acridum over the first seven days post-infection (p = 0.085, Table 1, Figure 3C). For day 9-13 there were significant differences among the infection and behaviourally classified treatment means (p < 0.0001, Table 1). On these later days, the EAG amplitudes of M. acridum-exposed non-responders, ExpNR, were lower than those of the similarly fungus-exposed, but responsive, ExpR, mosquitoes (Figure 3D).
Similar to the 1-octen-3-ol response pattern, in the early stages of infection exposure (days 1-3), there were no differences between EPG amplitudes in response to CO2 amongst the different mosquito classes (p = 0.34, Table 1, Figure 4C). However, at the later stages of infection (days 4-7), there were significant differences between EPG amplitudes in response to CO2 amongst the different mosquito classes (p < 0.0001, Table 1). More specifically, ExpNR mosquitoes exhibited significantly reduced EPG responses to CO2 compared to both UnExpNR and ExpR mosquitoes in later stages of infection, days 4-7 (Figure 4D).
There was only a marginal indication that mosquito classes differed in EPG responses to the mixture of 1-octen-3-ol and CO2 in day 1-3 (p = 0.05, Table 1), with no specific comparisons among treatment means showing significant differences (Figure 4E). In response to the mixture of 1-octen-3-ol and CO2 in days 4-7, there was a significant difference among treatments (p < 0.0001, Table 1), with the UnExpNR group again having a significantly weaker response than the other groups (Figure 4F). Thus, the EPG responses to CO2 and 1-octen-3-ol puffed as a mixture (Figures 4E, F) were similar to those in which 1-octen-3-ol or CO2 were puffed alone (Figures 4A-D).
A similar pattern of diminution of response of the large-spiking ORN tuned to CO2 after fungus exposure was not apparent, whether CO2 was puffed alone (p = 0.86, Table 1, Figure 6B) or as part of a blend along with 1-octen-3-ol (p = 0.29, Table 1, Figure 6D).
This study confirmed numerous previous studies indicating this particular isolate of B. bassiana to be lethal to mosquitoes [10, 14, 33]. Transferred to the field, the significant life shortening observed from even the relatively modest doses delivered in the current trials system should result in reduced vectorial capacity. However, the findings from this research supports previous studies [14, 34], that surviving fungal exposed mosquitoes exhibit reduced propensity to feed, which would reduce malaria transmission still further. Notably, the changed feeding behaviour (including reductions in upwind flight towards host cues) appears linked, at least in part, to reductions in responsiveness to host-related feeding stimuli.
As expected, the M. acridum isolate had a much less marked effect on mosquito survival and based on simple mortality assessments, might lead to the conclusion that exposed mosquitoes remain uninfected by this relatively acridid-specific pathogen. However, the behavioural and electrophysiological measurements indicate that mosquitoes suffered sub-lethal effects from M. acridum infection resulting in reduced feeding propensity and impaired olfaction. Many species of mosquitoes, including the major malaria vector An. gambiae, utilize CO2 and 1-octen-3-ol as olfactory cues in host-seeking behaviours . CO2 stimulation synergizes responses to host odour and by itself induces take-off and sustained flight behaviours in host-seeking anophelines [45, 46]. Some mosquito species use the discontinuous pulses from breath-emitted CO2 to fly upwind during their host-seeking behaviour, whereas other animal odorants, such as lactic acid, can contribute to additional host-locating upwind flight without being pulsed . Reception of CO2 integrates these odorant inputs to drive sustained upwind flight [35, 38]. The EAG, EPG, and single-cell neurophysiological recordings from behaviourally unresponsive fungus-exposed mosquitoes all show a corresponding reduction in neuron responsiveness to the host-related volatile compound, 1-octen-3-ol. These diminished neuronal responses were significantly lower than those obtained from behaviourally unresponsive control mosquitoes, indicating that the olfactory capabilities of the fungal-exposed mosquitoes are impaired and contribute to their behavioural reduction to feeding cues.
Why olfactory responsiveness to 1-octen-3-ol was so clearly and repeatedly reduced by B. bassiana exposure and that of CO2 is unknown. Because the maxillary palp ORNs responsive to these compounds co-reside in the same capitate peg type of sensillum, it seems unlikely that there is some kind of physical or chemical impairment producing blockage of cuticular pores reducing entry of molecules from the outside, or some kind of general ion imbalance in the receptor lymph caused by fungal infection. However, it should be noted that the odorant receptor type that is expressed on the ORN tuned to 1-octen-3-ol is a true odorant receptor (OR), whereas the "OR" that is expressed on the ORN tuned to CO2 is a gustatory receptor (GR) [48, 49]. ORs are coupled to an extra protein, Orco,  which forms a heterodimer with the odorant-ligand-accepting second receptor protein on the dendritic membrane. GRs are not coupled to Orco . In the case of the ORN tuned to 1-octen-3-ol, in An. gambiae this co-receptor that is tuned to 1-octen-3-ol is named AgOR8 [38, 51]. These differences in the dendritic membrane-bound protein receptors on these two types of neurons may possibly be related to the degree of fungal infection-related reduction of responsiveness in the ORN tuned to 1-octen-3-ol compared to that of the ORN tuned to CO2.
Fungal pathogens are known to release a range of toxins and secondary metabolites during infection that compete for energy reserves and cause general disruption of host tissues [52–54]. Studies on the pre-lethal effects of fungal infection in locusts demonstrate that infected locusts feed less and are less able to sustain flight compared with uninfected controls [28, 29], with "fever" responses  and fungus-secreted "energy scavenging" enzymes suggested to play a role . The results presented here add a new dimension to such pre or sub-lethal effects, indicating an impact of fungal infection on insect sensory capability.
This is the first study that, to our knowledge, correlates fungal-induced reductions in mosquito host-seeking behaviour with a decline in electrophysiological sensitivity of the olfactory apparatus. In the context of malaria control, reductions in response to feeding-related cues and upwind flight behaviour could add considerably to the direct impacts of fungal infection on mosquito survival. The importance of such subtle pre- or sub-lethal effects of fungal infection can only be tested fully under more realistic semi-field or field conditions. Placed in a more complicated environmental context with diverse and variable cues, it is possible that the effects we identified here might be relatively unimportant. Alternatively, and perhaps more likely, given we have been working over small spatial scales and dealing with young, healthy insects maintained under ideal laboratory conditions, the behavioural, physiological and survival effects we have found so far are underestimates of the potential of fungi to reduce malaria transmission.
We would like to thank Brian Chan, Brian Banks and Danielle Krocyznski for assistance in the lab and Nina Jenkins for provision of spores. This research was part-funded by grants from Gates Grand Challenges Explorations (No. 53066), the NIH-NIAID (R21AI088094-01) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco Settlement Funds. The Department specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations or conclusions.
- Hemingway J, Ranson H: Insecticide resistance to insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000, 45: 371-391. 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371.View ArticlePubMed
- Hargreaves K, Koekemoer LL, Brooke BD, Hunt RH, Mthembu J, Coetzee M: Anopheles funestus resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2000, 14: 1-9. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00211.x.View Article
- Hargreaves K, Hunt RH, Brooke BD, Mthembu J, Weeto MM, Awolola TS, Coetzee M: Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles quadriannulatus resistance to DDT in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2003, 17: 417-422. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2003.00460.x.View ArticlePubMed
- Brooke BD, Kloke G, Hunt RH, Koekemoer LL, Temu EA, Taylor ME, Small G, Hemingway J, Coetzee M: Bioassay and biochemical analyses of insecticide resistance in southern African Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2001, 91: 265-272. 10.1079/BER2001108.View ArticlePubMed
- Awolola TS, Brooke BD, Hunt RH, Coetzee M: Resistance of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae to pyrethroid insecticides, in south-western Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002, 96: 849-852. 10.1179/000349802125002581.View ArticlePubMed
- Diabate A, Brengues C, Baldet T, Dabire KR, Hougard JM, Akogbeto M, Kengne P, Simard F, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Chandre F: The spread of Leu-Phe-kdr mutation through Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkino Faso: genetic introgression and de novo phenomena. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 1267-1273. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01336.x.View ArticlePubMed
- Abdalla H, Matambo TS, Koekemoer LL, Mnzava AP, Hunt RH, Coetzee M: Insecticide susceptibility and vector status of natural populations of Anopheles arabiensis from Sudan. Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 102: 263-271.View Article
- Ranson H, Abdalla H, Badolo A, Guelbeogo WM, Kerah-Hizoumbe C, Yangalbe-Kalnone E, Sagnon N, Simard F, Coetzee M: Insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae: data from the Þrst year of a multicountry study highlight the extent of the problem. Malar J. 2009, 8: 299-10.1186/1475-2875-8-299.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Kikankie CK, Brook BD, Knols BGJ, Koekemoer LL, Farenhorst M, Hunt RH, Thomas MB, Coetzee M: The infectivity of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana to insecticide-resistant and susceptible Anopheles arabiensis at two different temperatures. Malar J. 2010, 9: 71-10.1186/1475-2875-9-71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Farenhorst M, Mouatcho JC, Kikankie CK, Brooke BD, Hunt RC, Thomas MB, Koekemoer LL, Knols BGJ, Coetzee M: Fungal infection counters insecticide resistance in African malaria mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 17443-17447. 10.1073/pnas.0908530106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Achonduh OA, Tondje PR: First report of pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana RBL1034 to the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in Cameroon. African J Biotechnol. 2008, 7: 931-935.
- Mohanty SS, Raghavendra K, Rai U, Dash AP: Efficacy of female Culex quinquefasciatus with entomopathogenic fungus Fusarium pallidoroseum. Parasitol Res. 2008, 103: 171-174. 10.1007/s00436-008-0946-z.View ArticlePubMed
- De Paula AR, Brito ES, Pereira CR, Carrera MP, Samuels RI: Susceptibility of adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to infection with Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana: prospects for Dengue control. Biocont Sci Techn. 2008, 18: 1017-1025. 10.1080/09583150802509199.View Article
- Blanford S, Chan BH, Jenkins N, Sim D, Turner RJ, Read AF, Thomas MB: Fungal pathogen reduces potential for malaria transmission. Science. 2005, 308: 1638-1641. 10.1126/science.1108423.View ArticlePubMed
- Scholte E-J, Ng'habi K, Kihonda J, Takken W, Paaijmans K, Abdulla S, Killeen GF, Knols BG: An entomopathogenic fungus for control of adult African malaria mosquitoes. Science. 2005, 308: 1641-1642. 10.1126/science.1108639.View ArticlePubMed
- Read AF, Thomas MB: Mosquitoes cut short. Science. 2009, 323: 51-52. 10.1126/science.1168659.View ArticlePubMed
- Hancock PA, Thomas MB, Godfray HCJ: An age-structured model to evaluate the potential of novel malaria-control interventions: a case study of fungal biopesticide sprays. Proc Roy Soc (London). 2009, 276: 71-80. 10.1098/rspb.2008.0689.View Article
- Maehara N, He HY, Shimazu M: Maturation feeding and transmission of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae) by Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) inoculated with Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J Econ Entomol. 2007, 100: 49-53. 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[49:MFATOB]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMed
- Tefera T, Pringle KL: Food consumption by Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae infected with Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and effects of natural versus artificial diets on mortality and mycosis. J Invertebr Pathol. 2003, 84: 220-225. 10.1016/j.jip.2003.11.001.View ArticlePubMed
- Arthurs SA, Thomas MB: Effects of a mycoinsecticide on feeding and fecundity of the brown locust, Locustana pardalina. Biocont Sci Techn. 2000, 10: 321-329. 10.1080/09583150050044592.View Article
- Ekesi S, Maniania NK: Susceptibility of Megalurothrips sjostedti development stages to Metarhizium anisopliae and the effects of infection on feeding, adult fecundity, egg fertility and longevity. Entomol Exp Appl. 2000, 94: 229-236. 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00624.x.View Article
- Ganassi S, Grazioso P, Moretti A, Sabatini MA: Effect of the fungus Lecanicillium lecanii on survival and reproduction of the aphid Schizaphis graminum. Biocontrol. 2010, 55: 299-312. 10.1007/s10526-009-9250-9.View Article
- Dembilio O, Quesada-Moraga E, Santiago-Alvarez C: Potential of an indigenous strain of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana as a biological control agent against the Red Plam Weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. J Invertebr Pathol. 2010, 104: 214-221. 10.1016/j.jip.2010.04.006.View ArticlePubMed
- Shi WB, Feng MG: Effect of fungal infection on reproductive potential and survival time of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 2009, 48: 229-237. 10.1007/s10493-009-9238-2.View ArticlePubMed
- Daniel C, Wyss E: Susceptibility of different life stages of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi to entomopathogenic fungi. J Appl Entomol. 2009, 133: 473-483. 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01410.x.View Article
- Hajek AE, Lund J, Smith MT: Reduction in fitness of female Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) infected with Metarhizium anisopliae. J Invertebr Pathol. 2008, 98: 198-205. 10.1016/j.jip.2007.12.003.View ArticlePubMed
- Seyoum E, Bateman RP, Charnley AK: The effect of Metarhizium anisopliae var acridum on haemolymph energy reserves and flight capability in the desert locust, Shistocerca greagaria. J Appl Entomol. 2002, 126: 119-124. 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2002.00609.x.View Article
- Seyoum E, Moore D, Charnley AK: Reduction in flight activity and food consumption by the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, after infection with Metarhizium flavoviride. J Appl Entomol. 1994, 118: 310-315. 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1994.tb00805.x.View Article
- Arthurs SA, Thomas MB: Investigation into behavioral changes in Schistocerca gregaria following infection with a mycoinsecticide: implications for susceptibility to predation. Ecol Entomol. 2001, 26: 227-234. 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00317.x.View Article
- Thomas MB, Blanford S, Gbongbui C, Lomer CJ: Experimental studies to evaluate spray applications of a mycoinsecticide against the rice grasshopper, Hieroglyphus danganesis, in northern Benin. Entomol Exp Appl. 1998, 87: 93-102. 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00309.x.View Article
- Sewify GH, Hashem MY: Effects of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin on cellular defence response and oxygen uptake of the wax moth Galleria mellonella L. (Pyralidae). J Appl Entomol. 2001, 125: 533-536. 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2001.00564.x.View Article
- Pedrini N, Villaverde ML, Fuse CB, Dal Bello GM, Juarez MP: Beauveria bassiana infection alters colony development and defensive secretions of the beetles Tribolium castaneum and Ulomoides dermestoides (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Econ Entomol. 2010, 103: 1094-1099. 10.1603/EC10072.View ArticlePubMed
- Howard AFV, N'Guessan R, Koendraadt CJM, Asidi A, Farenhorst M, Akogbeto M, Thomas MB, Knols BGJ, Takken W: The entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana reduces instantaeneous blood feeding in wild multi-insecticide-resistant Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes un Benin, West Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 87-10.1186/1756-3305-3-87.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Scholte EJ, Knols BGJ, Takken W: Infection of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae reduces blood feeding and fecundity. J Invertebr Pathol. 2006, 91: 43-49. 10.1016/j.jip.2005.10.006.View ArticlePubMed
- Takken W, Knols BGJ: Odor mediated behavior of Afrotropical malaria mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1999, 44: 131-157. 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.131.View ArticlePubMed
- Hall DR, Beevor PS, Cork A, Nesbitt BF, Vale GA: 1-octen-3-ol, a potent olfactory stimulant and attractant for tsetse isolated from cattle odors. Insect Sci Appl. 1984, 5: 335-339.
- Cork A, Park KC: Identification of electrophysiologically-active compounds for the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, in human sweat extracts. Med Vet Entomol. 1996, 10: 269-276. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00742.x.View ArticlePubMed
- Lu T, Qiu YT, Wang G, Kwon JY, Rutzler M, Kwon WH, Pitts JR, van Loon JA, Takken W, Carlson JR, Zwiebel LJ: Odor coding in the maxillary palp of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 1533-1544. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.062.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Bell AS, Blandford S, Jenkins N, Thomas MB, Read AF: Real-time quantitative PCR for analysis of candidate fungal biopesticides against malaria: Technique validation and first applications. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009, 100: 160-168. 10.1016/j.jip.2009.01.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Bischoff JF, Rehner SA, Humber RA: A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage. Mycologia. 2009, 101: 508-528.View Article
- Lomer CJ, Bateman RP, Johnson DL, Langewald J, Thomas M: Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001, 46: 667-702. 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.667.View ArticlePubMed
- Ghaninia M, Hansson BS, Ignell R: The antennal lobe of the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae-innervation and three-dimensional reconstruction. Arthr Struct Dev. 2007, 36: 23-39. 10.1016/j.asd.2006.06.004.View Article
- Stensmyr MC, Dekker T, Hansson BS: Evolution of the olfactory code in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Proc Biol Sci. 2003, 270: 2333-2340. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2512.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Qiu YT, Van Loon JJA, Takken W, Meijerink J, Smid HM: Olfactory coding in antennal neurons of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Chem Senses. 2006, 31: 845-863. 10.1093/chemse/bjl027.View ArticlePubMed
- Gillies MT: The role of carbon dioxide in host finding by mosquitoes (Diptera; Culicidae): a review. Bull Entomol Res. 1980, 70: 525-532. 10.1017/S0007485300007811.View Article
- Dekker T, Takken W, Carde RT: Structure of host odour plumes influences catch of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Aedes aegypti in a dual-choice olfactometer. Physiol Entomol. 2001, 26: 124-134. 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2001.00225.x.View Article
- Cooperband MF, Cardé RT: Orientation of Culex mosquitoes to carbon dioxide-baited traps: flight maneuvers and trapping efficiency. Med Vet Entomol. 2006, 26: 11-26.View Article
- Kwon JY, Dahanukar A, Weiss LA, Carlson JR: The molecular basis of CO2 reception in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 3574-3578. 10.1073/pnas.0700079104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Jones WD, Cayirlioglu P, Kadow IG, Vosshall LB: Two chemosensory receptors together mediate carbon dioxide detection in Drosophila. Nature. 2007, 445: 86-90. 10.1038/nature05466.View ArticlePubMed
- Vosshall LB, Hansson BS: A unified nomenclature system for the insect olfactory coreceptor. Chem Senses. 2011, 36: 497-498. 10.1093/chemse/bjr022.View ArticlePubMed
- Xia Y, Wang G, Buscariollo D, Pitts RJ, Wenger H, Zwiebel LJ: The molecular and cellular basis of olfactory-driven behavior in Anopheles gambiae larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 6433-6438. 10.1073/pnas.0801007105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Kershaw MJ, Moorhouse ER, Bateman R, Reynolds SE, Charnley AK: The role of destruxins in the pathogenicity of Metarhizium anisopliae for three species of insect. J Invertebr Pathol. 1999, 74: 213-223. 10.1006/jipa.1999.4884.View ArticlePubMed
- Hajek AE, St Leger RJ: Interactions between fungal pathogens and insect hosts. Annu Rev Entomol. 1994, 39: 293-322. 10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.001453.View Article
- Hung H, Bouchias DG: Influence of Beauveria bassiana on the cellular defense response of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua. J Invertebr Pathol. 1992, 60: 152-158. 10.1016/0022-2011(92)90089-M.View Article
- Elliot SL, Horton CM, Blanford S, Thomas MB: Impacts of fever on locust life-history traits: costs or benefits?. Biol Lett. 2005, 1: 181-184. 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0279.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Zhao H, Charnley AK, Wang ZK, Yin YP, Li YL, Li ZL, Peng GX, Xia YX: Identification of an extracellular acid trehalase and its gene involving in fungal pathogenesis from Metarizium anisopliae. J Biochem. 2006, 140: 319-327. 10.1093/jb/mvj159.View ArticlePubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.