Open Access

Dual fluorescent labelling of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum for the analysis of the ABC type transporter pfmdr2

  • Benyamin Rosental1,
  • Uzi Hadad1,
  • Rosa Sinay1,
  • Alex Braiman1,
  • Angel Porgador1, 2 and
  • Yaakov Pollack1Email author
Malaria Journal201211:371

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-371

Received: 2 September 2012

Accepted: 2 November 2012

Published: 8 November 2012

Abstract

Background

The study of the Plasmodium falciparum heavy metal transporter gene pfmdr2 employed radioactive labelled heavy metal. As the use of radioactive isotopes shrank considerably during the last few years, resulting in the cessation of the production of some isotopes, amongst them Cadmium109 which was used for that purpose, a different approach had to be developed. Herein, a dual fluorescent labelling of heavy metals accumulation in the P. falciparum parasite is proposed as an alternative to the use of radioactive labelled heavy metals.

Methods

Plasmodium falciparum Cd resistant and sensitive strains at the trophozoite stage were used in this study. The cells were cultured at different CdCl2 concentrations and for different time periods followed by staining of the infected red blood cells with Fluo-3/AM for Cd detection and Hoechst 33342 for parasite DNA labelling. The fluorescent analysis was done by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy.

Results

The results show that the sensitive strain has a higher Fluo-3/AM fluorescence in a Cd concentration and time dependent manner, whereas in the resistant strain Fluo-3/AM fluorescence levels were negligible and increased only at high concentrations of Cd and at long incubation periods, but to a much lesser extent than the sensitive strain. No Cd uptake is observed in uninfected red blood cells populations originating from cultures infected with either sensitive or resistant strain. In addition, confocal microscopy overlay of Fluo-3/AM and Hoechst staining shows that the Cd metal accumulates in the parasite itself.

Conclusions

The dual fluorescent labelling is a valid method for detecting heavy metal accumulation in P. falciparum. Furthermore, in contrast to the use of radioactive labelled heavy metal, the fluorescent labelling enables us to differentiate between the different populations existing in a P. falciparum infected red blood cells cultures and thus actually study a phenomenon at the level of a single cell.

Keywords

Fluorescent labelling Malaria Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr2 Fluo-3/AM Hoechst 33342 Heavy metals

Background

The development of the in vitro culturing technique of Plasmodium falciparum by Trager and Jensen[1] revolutionized the understanding of various aspects in the life cycle of this deadly parasite. The adoption of this technique in the research of malaria enabled the development of biochemical, physiological, immunological and genetic techniques[25] which resulted in a more comprehensive understanding of the biology of the parasite. In spite of this advancement, falciparum malaria remains the most prevalent infectious disease resulting in a high level of morbidity and mortality[6]. The major reasons for this state is the lack of an appropriate vaccine[7, 8] and the evolving phenomenon of anti-malarial drug resistance[9, 10]. The gaps which still exist in understanding the biology of the parasite contribute, although to a lesser extent, to this state. Since much of the studies on P. falciparum are done on the intact infected red blood cell (RBC) unit, it is preferable to be able to localize unequivocally the activity within the infected unit. This paper describes an assay of that nature which localizes heavy metal resistance to the parasite itself. By comparing heavy metal resistant and sensitive P. falciparum lines, it was previously shown[11] that this property, which prevents the accumulation of the heavy metal, is probably determined by the parasite's P. falciparum multidrug resistance 2 (pfmdr2) gene. However, as the labelling technique used a radioactive heavy metal, it was not possible to assess the resistance/sensitivity state at the level of a single infected RBC whereas the technique described in this paper allows it. This was achieved by dual labelling with Fluo-3/AM which labels the heavy metal whose transport is studied and Hoechst which labels the parasite by binding to its DNA. Fluo-3/AM was scarcely used in the study of P. falciparum and in those cases it served for determination of Ca+2 metabolism[1215]. Hoechst and derivatives is used more commonly and in all cases for the visualization of the parasite e.g.[1620]. No dual labelling with these two dyes was reported hitherto in the literature.

Methods

Parasites and culture conditions

The isolate P. falciparum FCR3 and a cadmium resistant line originating from it were used throughout this study. The in vitro culturing and synchronization of the parasites were carried out by standard protocols[1, 21]. Briefly, the parasites were cultured in flasks at 37°C and 5% haematocrit in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with human heat inactivated (30min at 56°C) plasma (A+ or AB+), 50μg/ml gentamycin, 25mM HEPES, and 0.25% sodium bicarbonate in an atmosphere of 5% O2 ,5% CO2 and 90% N2. The wild-type FCR3 line demonstrates sensitivity to heavy metal exposure, whereas the line originating from it by culturing it in the presence of a low concentration of CdCl2 exhibits a resistant phenotype, up to a concentration of 500 nM CdCl2[11] . This ability is not cadmium-dependent, and this line is therefore cultured in its absence[11]. The resistant line was then used in the comparative studies with the wild-type line unexposed to CdCl2.

Cd uptake and staining procedure

P. falciparum Cd resistant and sensitive strains infected RBCs at the trophozoite stage were cultured in a U shaped 96-well plate (105 cells/well) in 200μl for indicated times (5-45min, or for 20min for concentration dependent experiments) at 37°C with indicated CdCl2 concentrations (0.01-1μM, or 0.1μM for time dependent experiments), followed by three washes. Fluo-3/AM (Invitrogen detection technologies) staining was at a concentration of 5μM for 20min at 37°C, followed by two washes and incubation for 20min at 37°C. Hoechst 33342 (Fluka) staining was performed for 30min on ice at a concentration of 20μM. After staining, the cells were held on ice until analysed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. All procedures and washes were done in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) containing 3.5% glucose. The addition of glucose enabled the maintenance of the pfmdr2 ATP dependent transporter activity. Experiments were done at 8-12% parasitaemia, where in each experiment parasitaemia for the sensitive and resistant strains were the same.

Quantitation analysis

Flow cytometry

Stained infected RBCs were analysed by the fluorescence of Hoechst and Fluo-3/AM. Hoechst fluorescence was excited using a violet laser at 405nm and measured with a 450/50nm filter. Fluo-3/AM fluorescence was excited using a blue laser at 488nm and measured with a 530/30nm filter. Flow cytometry was performed using FACSCanto II (BD Bioscience) and results were analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Confocal microscopy

Stained infected RBCs were applied to a chambered μ-slide (ibiTreat, #80826, ibidi). The slides were mounted to the Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus: UPLSAPO 60X Oil NA:1.35). Fields containing infected RBCs were selected and images were acquired. Hoechst fluorescence was detected using a 405nm laser and measured in the 461nm channel; Fluo-3/AM fluorescence was detected using a 488nm laser and measured in the 527nm channel. Fields with infected RBCs were selected and images were acquired with indicated zoom magnitudes.

Results and discussion

To evaluate the Cd uptake by the malaria parasite we used Cd labelled with the fluorescent dye Fluo-3/AM. Flow cytometry was performed for quantitative evaluation and confocal microscopy for qualitative measurement. Compared to the previous method of radioactive Cd detection[11], the fluorescent detection allows to differentiate between the fluorescence of the infected RBC and that of the non-infected one. This separation is of utmost importance as it allows the detection of low number of infected RBCs in the total cell population. For detection of infected RBCs we used the DNA dye Hoechst 33342. As RBCs lack DNA, the only population that will be stained will be that of the infected RBCs due to the staining of the parasite's DNA. Hoechst staining to identify RBC infected with malaria has been used in many studies e.g. [16–20].

Using this approach it can be seen that Hoechst staining clearly differentiates, by flow cytometry, between two RBCs populations of high and low Hoechst fluorescence (Figure1A). Furthermore, analysis of these two populations using confocal microscopy shows unequivocally that: a) the high intensity Hoechst population consists of only infected RBCs, whereas the low intensity population contains only non-infected cells (Figure1B, two upper panels). b) Only the parasite within the RBC is stained (Figure1B, lower panels). Thus, the Hoechst staining enables us to focus directly on the infected RBCs.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-11-371/MediaObjects/12936_2012_Article_2596_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Detection of P. falciparum infected RBCs using Hoechst staining. (A) Representative flow cytometry fluorescent histogram of RBCs infected with P. falciparum stained with Hoechst. The Hoechst fluorescent axis is in Log scale. (B) RBCs infected with P. falciparum were stained with Hoechst, and then applied to chambered μ-slides. Representative confocal images are shown. Left panels: Differential Interference Contrast (DIC), middle panels: Hoechst (Blue), right panels: overly of Hoechst staining and DIC. Cells positive to Hoechst are marked with yellow arrows. [Red scale bar = 10μm].

To assess the fluorescent method of Fluo-3/AM staining for Cd uptake, the P. falciparum pfmdr2 system, an ABC-type transporter that is involved in heavy metal homeostasis[11] was used. In this system, the Cd-resistant strain has a functional form of pfmdr2 gene, enabling its survival in the presence of high Cd concentrations. On the other hand, the sensitive strain has an impaired form of this gene, due to a premature translational termination, thus it cannot survive the high concentrations of Cd accumulated[11]. First, the uptake at different Cd concentrations was assessed. The results show that the sensitive strain has a higher Fluo-3/AM fluorescence in a Cd concentration dependent manner, while in the resistant strain Fluo-3/AM fluorescence levels increases only at high concentrations of Cd, but to a lesser extent than the sensitive line (Figure2A-B). Similar results were obtained by confocal microscopy (Figure2C). Furthermore, the confocal microscopy overlay of Fluo-3/AM and Hoechst staining (Figure2C enlarged image) shows that the Fluo-3/AM and the Hoechst staining are localized within the parasite (yellow arrow). No Cd uptake is observed in uninfected RBCs populations originating from cultures infected either with the sensitive or the resistant lines (Figure2A-C). These last two points demonstrate that the Cd uptake measured by Fluo-3/AM is specific to infected RBCs, and that this Cd uptake accumulates mainly within the parasite.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-11-371/MediaObjects/12936_2012_Article_2596_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Concentration dependent accumulation of Cd in RBCs infected with P. falciparum Cd resistant and sensitive strains. (A-B) Fluo-3/AM fluorescence in Cd concentration dependent manner analysed by flow cytometry, Sensitive and Resistant denote RBCs infected with sensitive and resistant parasite respectively. (A) Two dimensional flow cytometry dot plots of stained populations of RBCs with Fluo-3/AM and Hoechst. (B) After gating the populations for positive and negative to Hoechst, at a threshold of 1.5*103 Hoechst fluorescent intensity, Fluo-3/AM fluorescence geometric mean was calculated. The samples without Cd served as control. RBC-s and RBC-r denote non-infected RBCs originating from the sensitive and resistant cultures respectively. Each time point is a mean of duplicates, Bars ± SD. (C) Confocal images: I: Hoechst (Blue), II: Fluo-3/AM (Green), III: combined Hoechst and Fluo-3/AM, IV: combined Hoechst and Fluo-3/AM with DIC (also shown in the enlarged image). Yellow arrow points to Fluo-3/AM overlapping with Hoechst. [Red scale bar = 20μm]. For the sensitive and resistant strains parasitaemia was 11%. The results are from one representative experiment of three performed.

To further characterize the Cd accumulation by Fluo-3/AM in comparison to the radioactive method, a time curve of Cd uptake experiments was performed. As measured by flow cytometry, Fluo-3/AM fluorescence increases in a time dependent manner in the RBCs infected with the P. falciparum sensitive line whereas the level of fluorescence in those infected with the resistant line was low and not time dependent (Figure3A). In accordance with the results in Figure2, the uninfected RBCs did not show any change in fluorescence levels with incubation time (Figure3A). The confocal microscopy images confirmed the results obtained by flow cytometry (Figure3B), namely, levels of Fluo-3/AM increase in the sensitive strain in a time dependent manner.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-11-371/MediaObjects/12936_2012_Article_2596_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Time dependent Cd accumulation in RBCs infected with P. falciparum Cd resistant and sensitive strains. (A) Fluo-3/AM fluorescence in a time dependent manner analysed by flow cytometry. After gating the populations for positive and negative to Hoechst, Fluo-3/AM fluorescence geometric mean was calculated. The samples without Cd served as control. Sensitive and resistant denote RBCs infected with sensitive and resistant parasite respectively. RBC-s and RBC-r denote non-infected RBCs originating from the sensitive and resistant cultures respectively. Each time point is a mean of duplicates, Bars ± SD. (B) Confocal images: I: Hoechst (Blue), II: Fluo-3/AM (Green), III: combined Hoechst and Fluo-3/AM, IV: combined Hoechst and Fluo-3/AM with DIC. [Red scale bar = 20μm]. The results are from one representative experiment of two performed. For the sensitive and resistant strains parasitaemia was 10%.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that Fluo-3/AM fluorescent labelling is a reliable method for following a physiological process occurring in living cells, in this case the active accumulation of Cd in P. falciparum infected RBCs. The method is time and concentration dependent, the two basic biological parameters needed for the characterization of a biological process. It is also shown that the use of Hoechst dye enables the distinction between the different populations existing in a P. falciparum infected RBCs culture and thus actually study a phenomenon at the level of a single cell. This is the major advantage of this procedure over the previous radioactive method which yielded information only on the entire population. The method described here can be used both for quantitative measurements (flow cytometry) as well as for qualitative assessments (confocal microscopy). As was shown recently for studying oxidative stress in P. falciparum infected RBCs[22], the basic idea underlying this method can be extended to the study of other properties of the parasite once the appropriate fluorescent tag is available.

Abbreviations

RBCs: 

Red blood cells

DIC: 

Differential Interference Contrast

Cd: 

Cadmium/Cd2+

pfmdr2: 

P. falciparum multidrug resistance 2.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

AB acknowledges the support of the Israel Science Foundation, grants: 1165/08 and 1661/08.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
(2)
National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

References

  1. Trager W, Jensen JB: Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976, 193: 673-675. 10.1126/science.781840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ljungström I, Perlmann H, Schlichtherle M, Scherf A, Wahlgren M: Methods in malaria research. 2004, http://www.mr4.org/Portals/3/Pdfs/ProtocolBook/Methods_in_malaria_research.pdf., 4Google Scholar
  3. Grimberg BT: Methodology and application of flow cytometry for investigation of human malaria parasites. J Immunol Meth. 2011, 367: 1-16. 10.1016/j.jim.2011.01.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Campuzano-Zuluaga G, Hänscheid T, Grobusch MP: Automated haematology analysis to diagnose malaria. Malar J. 2010, 9: 346-10.1186/1475-2875-9-346.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crabb BS, Rug M, Gilberger T-W, Thompson JK, Triglia T, Maier AG, Cowman AF: Transfection of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Meth Mol Biol. 2004, 270: 263-276.Google Scholar
  6. Snow R, Guerra C, Noor A, Myint H, Hay S: The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2005, 10: 214-217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schwartz L, Brown GV, Genton B, Moorthy VS: A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table. Malar J. 2012, 11: 11-10.1186/1475-2875-11-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thera MA, Plowe CV: Vaccines for malaria: how close are we?. Ann Rev Med. 2012, 63: 345-357. 10.1146/annurev-med-022411-192402.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. White NJ: Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113: 1084-1092.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sá JM, Chong JL, Wellems TE: Malaria drug resistance: new observations and developments. Essays Biochem. 2011, 51: 137-160.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosenberg E, Litus I, Schwarzfuchs N, Sinay R, Schlesinger P, Golenser J, Baumeister S, Lingelbach K, Pollack Y: pfmdr2 confers heavy metal resistance to Plasmodium falciparum. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 27039-27045. 10.1074/jbc.M601686200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Varotti FP, Beraldo FH, Gazarini ML, Garcia CRS: Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites display a THG-sensitive Ca2+ pool. Cell Calcium. 2003, 33: 137-144. 10.1016/S0143-4160(02)00224-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gazarini ML, Garcia CRS: The malaria parasite mitochondrion senses cytosolic Ca2+ fluctuations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 321: 138-144. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Niemoeller OM, Foller M, Lang C, Huber SM, Lang F: Retinoic acid induced suicidal erythrocyte death. Cellular Physiol Biochem. 2008, 21: 193-202. 10.1159/000113761.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bagnaresi P, Barros NM, Assis DM, Melo PM, Fonseca RG, Juliano MA, Pesquero JB, Juliano L, Rosenthal PJ, Carmona AK, Gazarini ML: Intracellular proteolysis of kininogen by malaria parasites promotes release of active kinins. Malar J. 2012, 11: 156-10.1186/1475-2875-11-156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Howard RJ, Battye FL, Mitchell GF: Plasmodium-infected blood cells analyzed and sorted by flow fluorimetry with the deoxyribonucleic acid binding dye 33258 Hoechst. J Histochem Cytochem. 1979, 27: 803-813. 10.1177/27.4.87413.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reinders PP, van Vianen PH, van der Keur M, van Engen A, Janse CJ, Tanke HJ: Computer software for testing drug susceptibility of malaria parasites. Cytometry. 1995, 19: 273-281. 10.1002/cyto.990190312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Grimberg BT, Erickson JJ, Sramkoski RM, Jacobberger JW, Zimmerman PA: Monitoring Plasmodium falciparum growth and development by UV flow cytometry using an optimized Hoechst-thiazole orange staining strategy. Cytometry A. 2008, 73: 546-554.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Theron M, Hesketh RL, Subramanian S, Rayner JC: An adaptable two-color flow cytometric assay to quantitate the invasion of erythrocytes by Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Cytometry A. 2010, 77: 1067-1074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Malleret B, Claser C, Ong ASM, Suwanarusk R, Sriprawat K, Howland SW, Russell B, Nosten F, Rénia L: A rapid and robust tri-color flow cytometry assay for monitoring malaria parasite development. Sci Rep. 2011, 1: 118-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambros C, Vanderberg JP: Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol. 1979, 65: 418-420. 10.2307/3280287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fu Y, Tilley L, Kenny S, Klonis N: Dual labeling with a far red probe permits analysis of growth and oxidative stress in P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Cytometry A. 2010, 77: 253-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rosental et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.