Open Access

Molecular markers of resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine during intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women in Benin

  • Gwladys Bertin1, 2,
  • Valérie Briand1, 2,
  • Diana Bonaventure1, 2,
  • Ambre Carrieu1, 2,
  • Achille Massougbodji3, 4,
  • Michel Cot1, 2 and
  • Philippe Deloron1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
Malaria Journal201110:196

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-196

Received: 28 March 2011

Accepted: 19 July 2011

Published: 19 July 2011

Abstract

Background

The prevention of malaria faces with the repeated emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to drugs, often involving point mutations of the target gene. In the pregnant woman, currently the WHO recommendation is the administration of an intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance has increased for several years in Africa, stressing the need for alternative molecules. In this context, the first randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of SP and mefloquine for IPTp has been conducted recently in Benin. Using samples from this trial, the current study evaluated and quantified the prevalence of mutations on the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes as well as the copy number of the pfmdr1 gene in parasites from P. falciparum-infected pregnant women before first and second IPTp administration, and at delivery.

Methods

PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymorphic codons of the pfdhfr gene (51, 59, 108, and 164) was performed. The identification of mutations in three codons of the pfdhps gene (436, 437 and 540) was achieved by PCR and sequencing. Copy number quantification for pfmdr1 gene was performed using real-time PCR.

Results

Results show a high prevalence rate of mutant parasites in women taking IPTp with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine or mefloquine. The prevalence of triple and quadruple mutants was high before first drug regimen administration (79/93, 85%), and remained similar until delivery. Infection with mutant parasites was not correlated with low birth weight nor placental infection. In all samples, the copy number of pfmdr1 gene was equal to one.

Conclusions

The clinical trial comparing SP and mefloquine efficacy during IPTp showed SP remained efficacious in preventing low birth weight. The present study shows a high prevalence of triple and quadruple mutations implicated in SP resistance. Although the pfdhfr/pfdhps triple and quadruple mutations were frequent, there was no evidence of correlation between these genotypes and the lack of efficacy of SP in the context of IPTp. Nevertheless, it is now obvious that SP will soon be compromised in whole Africa. Molecular markers have been recommended to monitor SP efficacy for IPTp, but given the current prevalence of mutant parasites their usefulness is questionable.

Background

Plasmodium falciparum infection during pregnancy is responsible for placental infection, and constitutes a substantial risk for the mother, her foetus, and the neonate. It is a major cause of anaemia and maternal death, and one of the main causes of low birth weight (LBW). The WHO recommends protecting the women during pregnancy using intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) with one curative regimen of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (1,500 mg sulphadoxine and 75 mg pyrimethamine), at least twice during pregnancy, once during the 2nd trimester, and then at least one month apart. IPTp with SP has proven efficacious in reducing the burden of pregnancy-associated malaria (PAM), and is currently part of the national malaria prevention programme in most African countries.

A recent study has compared three studies performed in Benin, showing that SP-IPTp is effective both in reducing the LBW rate, as compared to chloroquine prophylaxis (10% with SP-IPTp given as national policy and 8.7% in a controlled IPTp trial ([1], vs. 15.7% with chloroquine [2]), and the malaria placental infection prevalence rate (11.2% vs. 2.9% and 16.7%, respectively), with a good overall compliance of the national IPTp [3]. However, resistance to SP is developing increasingly in Africa. Several molecular epidemiology studies showed that resistance to pyrimethamine is associated with the acquisition of mutations in the gene coding for dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) (S108N, N51I, and C59R, and I164L) [4, 5]. The S108N mutant exhibits a low level of resistance, the N51I/S108N or the C59R/S108N double mutants intermediate levels of resistance, and the N51I/C59R/S108N triple mutant has a higher level of resistance to pyrimethamine. Similarly, resistance to sulphadoxine is due to three mutations in the gene encoding dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) (S436F, A437G, K540E) [6, 7]. Each successive mutation causes a greater decrease in sensitivity respectively to pyrimethamine and sulphadoxine. It has been showed that the increased prevalence of mutations on the pfdhfr and pfdhps gene is linked to intensive use of SP. Indeed, a study showed that the frequency of the triple pfdhfr (N51I, C59R, S108N) and double pfdhps (A437G, K540E) mutants increased by 37% - 63% and 200% -300% respectively when SP was used as the first line treatment of malaria attacks [8]. Another study showed that the frequency of pfdhfr mutations increased, especially after the change in treatment policy [9].

In many countries, SP now demonstrates inadequate therapeutic efficacy in children under 5 years old, and is no longer the drug of choice for treatment. However, data collected in young children cannot be extrapolated to pregnant women, in whom SP IPTp seems to still retain its efficacy [10, 11]. Nevertheless, the reducing activity of SP requires further investigations, especially in the context of IPTp. To date, mefloquine (MQ) is one of the most attractive alternatives to SP for IPTp. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of SP and MQ for IPTp has recently been completed in Benin [11], showing that SP IPTp kept efficacy in a context of growing resistance to SP [12]. Indeed, SP and MQ were found to be equivalent and highly efficacious in the prevention of LBW.

This study was extended with the aim to search for mutations of the genes associated to SP resistance and to evaluate the copy number of pfmdr1 gene during pregnancy and at delivery in Beninese women under IPTp. This exploratory investigation looked at the impact of the point mutations on the outcome of pregnancy.

Methods

Study site and subjects

A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of SP and MQ for IPTp was conducted from July 2005 to April 2008 in the rural city of Ouidah, Benin. A total 1,601 women were randomized to receive MQ (n = 802) or SP (n = 799). All enrolled women were followed from their first antenatal care visit at the 2nd trimester of pregnancy until delivery. The treatment consisted of two curative doses of SP (1,500 mg of sulphadoxine and 75 mg of pyrimethamine per dose) or MQ (15 mg/kg per dose). Drugs were administered under observation. At the time of IPTp administration (first and second doses given during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy), and at delivery, blood was collected for thick smear confection and filter paper blotting. Details of this clinical trial have been previously reported [11].

All filter papers corresponding to positive blood smears were analysed for pfdhfr and pfdhps mutations and pfmdr1 copy number. At delivery, samples from all women presenting or having presented with at least one positive smear during the follow-up were analysed, even if concomitant thick blood smear was negative.

DNA extraction and genotyping of point mutations

Blood collected on filter paper spots was dried and conserved at room temperature until DNA extraction using "Qiagen Kit" [13]. Genotyping for mutations in codons 51, 59, 108, and 164 of the pfdhfr gene was achieved by a technique of DNA amplification by PCR of 40 cycles with 4 μl DNA extract [14, 15]. The amplicon obtained was 718 bp and was submitted to a second PCR of 25 cycles with 1 μl of the first PCR product to frame areas of interest. The fragment size obtained varied between 189 and 412 bp. The PCR products were digested by restriction enzymes that varied with the studied codon (Tsp509I, XMN I, Alu I, and Dra I, respectively). For codon 51, the presence of two DNA bands of 148 bp and 64 bp demonstrates a wild genotype, and contrasts to a single band of 212 bp observed with a mutant genotype. Similarly, for codons 108 and 164, a wild genotype is characterized by two or three bands of 322 to 54 bp and 171, 135, 106 bp, respectively. The mutant genotype exhibits a single band of 376 pb for codon 108, and four bands of 143, 135, 106 and 28 pb for codon 164. Finally at codon 59, a mutant genotype is characterized by two bands of 162 and 27 pb, and a wild genotype by a single band of 189 pb. For each analysis, control strains were used, consisting in both the 3D7 strain (wild type for pfdhfr) and the W2 and V/1S strains (mutant type for pfdhfr) [1618].

Genotyping for mutations of the pfdhps gene in codons 437, and 540 was performed by PCR of 35 cycles with 2 μl of DNA extract [15, 19, 14]. The PCR product obtained is 528 bp. The identification of mutations in these 2 codons was achieved by sequencing (ABI prism 310). The copy number for pfmdr1 gene was quantified by real-time PCR according to Sidhu et al and Price et al[20, 21].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using STATA® 9.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). Differences between proportions were compared using the Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon test. The level of statistical significance retained was p < 0.05. Nine women were infected twice during pregnancy. Because of non-independent data, they were excluded from the analysis comparing the proportions of mutant parasites at different time-points during pregnancy.

Results and discussion

A total of 181 women were infected during pregnancy, and among them nine were infected twice. They presented an average age of 23 years, and 41% were primigravidae. A total of 110 women had received SP, and 71 had received MQ. From the 190 samples collected and analysed, 160 genotyping were successful. A total of 113 samples collected at inclusion (before first IPTp dose), 31 at second IPTp administration (two months later in average), and 46 at delivery were investigated (Figure 1). A single copy of the pfmdr1 gene was found in parasites from all pregnant women at first and second IPTp administrations, as well as at delivery. This result indicates that the parasites present in these women were all of wild-type genotype for the pfmdr1 gene.
Figure 1

Study profile. IPTp, intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy; SP, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine; MQ, mefloquine.

At inclusion, the prevalence of triple pfdhfr mutant was 85% in parasites sampled from the 96 women, before any drug administration. Similar prevalence rates were observed in the MQ and SP groups (Table 1). Mutation at codons pfdhfr 164 and pfdhps 540 was not observed in any sample, thus no quintuple mutants were observed. The proportion of pfdhfr triple mutant parasites (51, 59, and 108) did not vary significantly at the 3 sampling times, neither in the SP group (80% vs. 92% vs. 68%; P = 0.33) nor in the MQ group (90% vs. 89% vs. 64%; P = 0.07) (Table 1). Similarly, the prevalence of quadruple mutations (at codons 51, 59, and 108 of the pfdhfr gene and codon 437 of the pfdhps gene) did not vary at the 3 sampling times (74% vs. 92% vs. 61%; P = 0.19 for the SP group, and 81% vs. 71% vs. 60%; P = 0.39 for the MQ group). Women having presented more than one infection during follow-up, and thus being included in more than one group, were excluded from those analyses to avoid data dependency.
Table 1

Prevalence rates of pfdhfr/pfdhps mutant parasites during the course of pregnancy, by treatment group.

Molecular marker

Before first

IPTp

administration

Before second

IPTp

administration

At delivery

  

SP

 

pfdhfr 51

53/57

18/18

28/28

pfdhfr 59

45/54

17/20

20/27

pfdhfr 108

54/59

21/21

28/29

pfdhfr 164

0/50

0/15

0/19

pfdhfr triple mutants*

43/53

16/18

19/27

pfdhps 437

52/55

21/22

27/27

pfdhps 540

0/62

0/22

0/28

pfdhfr/pfdhps quadruple mutants**

37/49

16/18

16/22

  

MQ

 

pfdhfr 51

44/47

9/9

10/11

pfdhfr 59

40/43

7/8

10/11

pfdhfr 108

46/47

9/9

11/11

pfdhfr 164

0/41

0/8

0/9

pfdhfr triple mutants*

39/43

7/8

8/11

pfdhps 437

39/43

6/7

10/10

pfdhps 540

0/47

0/8

0/9

pfdhfr/pfdhps quadruple mutants*

34/42

4/6

7/10

* pfdhfr triple mutants: (pfdhfr 51, 59 and 108)

** pfdhfr/pfdhps quadruple mutants: pfdhfr 51, 59 and 108 + pfdhps 437

At delivery, the prevalence of triple or quadruple mutant parasites did not differ between the MQ and SP groups (64% vs 70%; P = 0.48; and 60% vs 65%; P = 0.54, respectively) (Table 1).

Such a high prevalence of mutations at inclusion, before any drug administration, is not surprising as prevalence rates above 50% of the triple pfdhfr mutant were also reported in Viet Nam [22], Malaysia [23], and Brazil [24]. In Africa, this rate ranges from 40% [25, 26] to 75% [27, 28]. These results in the context of IPTp are also similar to those published by Bouyou-Akotet et al[29], where the prevalence rates of triple and quadruple mutants were 80% and 53%, respectively. Such a high prevalence rate of mutations at inclusion heavily impairs any conclusion on the possible selection of parasite populations inducing an increase in resistance to SP. A very high number of infected pregnant women would be required for such an investigation. Even in areas of intense P. falciparum transmission, the expected proportion of women infected at enrolment may be relatively high (in the 15 to 25% range), but is drastically reduced (to a few percents) in women receiving IPTp. This study included 1601 pregnant women, a significant number of women. However, given the high prevalence of mutants at inclusion, the power to detect a limited increase of the prevalence of mutants during follow-up was too low. There was no difference in parasitaemia between women infected with mutant parasites compared to women with wild parasites neither at inclusion (median parasitaemia: 1408/mm3 vs. 1236/mm3, P = 0.89) nor at delivery in the SP group (median parasitaemia: 7714/mm3 vs. 15 743/mm3, P = 0.86). In addition, the genotyping results were not correlated with clinical efficacy of the drug, as assessed by placental infection or low birth weight (birth weight < 2,500 g) rates. The risk of placental infection did not differ in the absence or in the presence of triple and/or quadruple mutants during pregnancy in the SP group (0% (0/10) vs 2.4% (1/41); P = 0.81). Similarly, the risk of low birth weight baby did not differ in the absence or in the presence of triple or quadruple mutants during pregnancy. The mean weight of offspring of women infected during pregnancy (at inclusion or at second administration of IPTp) was 2724 g (2473-2975) if a triple or quadruple mutant was present, and 2808 g (2672-2944) if not (P = 0.29).

The women who were infected at delivery were often not the same as those previously infected by a triple or quadruple mutant parasite. In other words, women infected by a triple or quadruple mutant parasite during their pregnancy showed no increased risk for placental infection, as compared to women infected with wild type parasites. This suggests a lack of correlation between multiple pfdhfr/pfdhps mutations and SP failure in the context of IPTp, as assessed by the presence of a placental infection.

Conclusion

The very high proportion of pfdhfr/pfdhps triple and quadruple mutations observed in this study (64 to 89% of infections for the three-time monitoring) did not allow to conclude statistically, although it is unlikely that infection with these genotypes actually correlates to the lack of efficacy of SP in the context of IPTp. Indeed, the current study shows that SP retained efficacy in preventing placental infection. Nevertheless, it is now obvious that SP will soon be compromised in whole Africa, and an urgent need exists to assess alternative drug regimens for IPTp, as well as to monitor SP efficacy for IPTp by other means than molecular markers [30]. Molecular markers have been recommended, but given the current prevalence of mutant parasites, their usefulness is questionable, and alternative strategies have to be developed.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all women and children who participated in the trial. We thank the team of the parasitology laboratory of the hospital Bichat, especially Veronique Hubert, for help in sequencing the pfdhps gene.

The trial received financial support from the Fonds de Solidarité Prioritaire (French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, project number 2006-22), and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Mère et enfant face aux infections tropicales (UMR216)
(2)
Université Paris Descartes
(3)
Laboratoire de parasitologie, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé (FSS)
(4)
Centre d'Étude et de Recherche sur le Paludisme Associé à la Grossesse et l'Enfance (CERPAGE)

References

  1. Briand V, Denoeud L, Massougbodji A, Cot M: Efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment versus chloroquine prophylaxis to prevent malaria during pregnancy in Benin. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 594-601. 10.1086/590114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Denoeud L, Fievet N, Aubouy A, Ayemonna P, Kiniffo R, Massougbodji A, Cot M: Is chloroquine chemoprophylaxis still effective to prevent low birth weight? Results of a study in Benin. Malar J. 2007, 6: 27-10.1186/1475-2875-6-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Le Port A, Cottrell G, Dechavanne C, Briand V, Bouraima A, Guerra J, Choudat I, Massougbodji A, Fayomi B, Migot-Nabias F, Garcia A, Cot M: Prevention of malaria during pregnancy: assessing the effect of the distribution of IPTp through the national policy in Benin. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011, 84: 270-275. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Basco LK, Eldin de Pécoulas P, Wilson CM, Le Bras J, Mazabraud A: Point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene and pyrimethamine and cycloguanil resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995, 69: 135-138. 10.1016/0166-6851(94)00207-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Curtis J, Duraisingh MT, Trigg JK, Mbwana H, Warhurst DC, Curtis CF: Direct evidence that asparagine at position 108 of the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase is involved in resistance to antifolate drugs in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 90: 678-680. 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90432-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks DR, Wang P, Read M, Watkins WM, Sims PF, Hyde JE: Sequence variation of the hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase: dihydropteroate synthase gene in lines of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, with differing resistance to sulphadoxine. Eur J Biochem. 1994, 224: 397-405. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00397.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang P, Read M, Sims PF, Hyde JE: Sulphadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 23: 979-986. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2821646.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Malisa AL, Pearce RJ, Abdulla S, Mshinda H, Kachur PS, Bloland P, Roper C: Drug coverage in treatment of malaria and the consequences for resistance evolution--evidence from the use of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine. Malar J. 2010, 9: 190-10.1186/1475-2875-9-190.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nsanzabana C, Hastings IM, Marfurt J, Müller I, Baea K, Rare L, Schapira A, Felger I, Betschart B, Smith TA, Beck HP, Genton B: Quantifying the evolution and impact of antimalarial drug resistance: drug use, spread of resistance, and drug failure over a 12-year period in Papua New Guinea. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201: 435-443. 10.1086/649784.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ter Kuile FO, van Eijk AM, Filler SJ: Effect of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance on the efficacy of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria control during pregnancy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007, 297: 2603-2616. 10.1001/jama.297.23.2603. ReviewView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Briand V, Bottero J, Noël H, Masse V, Cordel H, Guerra J, Kossou H, Fayomi B, Ayemonna P, Fievet N, Massougbodji A, Cot M: Intermittent treatment for the prevention of malaria during pregnancy in Benin: a randomized, open-label equivalence trial comparing sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine with mefloquine. J Infect Dis. 2009, 200: 991-1001. 10.1086/605474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Faucher JF, Aubouy A, Adeothy A, Cottrell G, Doritchamou J, Gourmel B, Houzé P, Kossou H, Amedome H, Massougbodji A, Cot M, Deloron P: Comparison of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, unsupervised artemether-lumefantrine, and unsupervised artesunate-amodiaquine fixed-dose formulation for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Benin: a randomized effectiveness noninferiority trial. J Infect Dis. 2009, 200: 57-65. 10.1086/599378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Price RN, Cassar C, Brockman A, Duraisingh M, van Vugt M, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: The pfmdr1 gene is associated with a multidrug-resistant phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum from the western border of Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 2943-2949.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gyang FN, Peterson DS, Wellems TE: Plasmodium falciparum: rapid detection of dihydrofolate reductase mutations that confer resistance to cycloguanil and pyrimethamine. Exp Parasitol. 1992, 74: 470-472. 10.1016/0014-4894(92)90209-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang P, Brooks DR, Sims PF, Hyde JE: A mutation-specific PCR system to detect sequence variation in the dihydropteroate synthetase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995, 71: 115-125. 10.1016/0166-6851(95)00041-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson DS, Walliker D, Wellems TE: Evidence that a point mutation in dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase confers resistance to pyrimethamine in falciparum malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 9114-9118. 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9114.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooks DR, Wang P, Read M, Watkins WM, Sims PF, Hyde JE: Sequence variation of the hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase: dihydropteroate synthase gene in lines of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, with differing resistance to sulphadoxine. Eur J Biochem. 1994, 224: 397-405. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00397.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Triglia T, Cowman AF: Primary structure and expression of the dihydropteroate synthetase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 7149-7153. 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zolg JW, Chen GX, Plitt JR: Detection of pyrimethamine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum by mutation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1990, 39: 257-265. 10.1016/0166-6851(90)90064-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sidhu AB, Uhlemann AC, Valderramos SG, Valderramos JC, Krishna S, Fidock DA: Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in Plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 528-535. 10.1086/507115.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Price RN, Cassar C, Brockman A, Duraisingh M, van Vugt M, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: The pfmdr1 gene is associated with a multidrug-resistant phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum from the western border of Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 2943-2949.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang P, Read M, Sims PF, Hyde JE: Sulphadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 23: 979-986. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2821646.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cox-Singh J, Zakaria R, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA, Nagappan S, Singh B: Short report: differences in dihydrofolate reductase but not dihydropteroate synthase alleles in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from geographically distinct areas in Malaysia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 28-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Vasconcelos KF, Plowe CV, Fontes CJ, Kyle D, Wirth DF, Pereira da Silva LH, Zalis MG: Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase of isolates from the Amazon region of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000, 95: 721-728. 10.1590/S0074-02762000000500020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nzila AM, Mberu EK, Sulo J, Dayo H, Winstanley PA, Sibley CH, Watkins WM: Towards an understanding of the mechanism of pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: genotyping of dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase of Kenyan parasites. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 991-996. 10.1128/AAC.44.4.991-996.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dicko A, Sagara I, Djimdé AA, Touré SO, Traore M, Dama S, Diallo AI, Barry A, Dicko M, Coulibaly OM, Rogier C, de Sousa A, Doumbo OK: Molecular markers of resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine one year after implementation of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in infants in Mali. Malar J. 2010, 9: 9-10.1186/1475-2875-9-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Aubouy A, Jafari S, Huart V, Migot-Nabias F, Mayombo J, Durand R, Bakary M, Le Bras J, Deloron P: DHFR and DHPS genotypes of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Gabon correlate with in vitro activity of pyrimethamine and cycloguanil, but not with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment efficacy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003, 52: 43-49. 10.1093/jac/dkg294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mockenhaupt FP, Bedu-Addo G, Eggelte TA, Hommerich L, Holmberg V, von Oertzen C, Bienzle U: Rapid increase in the prevalence of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance among Plasmodium falciparum isolated from pregnant women in Ghana. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 1545-1549. 10.1086/592455.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bouyou-Akotet MK, Mawili-Mboumba DP, Tchantchou Tde D, Kombila M: High prevalence of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine-resistant alleles of Plasmodium falciparum isolates in pregnant women at the time of introduction of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in Gabon. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010, 65: 438-441. 10.1093/jac/dkp467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Deloron P, Bertin G, Briand V, Massougbodji A, Cot M: Sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010, 16: 1666-1670.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bertin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.