Real-time PCR detection of Plasmodium directly from whole blood and filter paper samples
- Brian J Taylor†1,
- Kimberly A Martin†1,
- Eliana Arango2,
- Olga M Agudelo2,
- Amanda Maestre2 and
- Stephanie K Yanow3, 4Email author
© Taylor et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 7 June 2011
Accepted: 19 August 2011
Published: 19 August 2011
Real-time PCR is a sensitive and specific method for the analysis of Plasmodium DNA. However, prior purification of genomic DNA from blood is necessary since PCR inhibitors and quenching of fluorophores from blood prevent efficient amplification and detection of PCR products.
Reagents designed to specifically overcome PCR inhibition and quenching of fluorescence were evaluated for real-time PCR amplification of Plasmodium DNA directly from blood. Whole blood from clinical samples and dried blood spots collected in the field in Colombia were tested.
Amplification and fluorescence detection by real-time PCR were optimal with 40× SYBR® Green dye and 5% blood volume in the PCR reaction. Plasmodium DNA was detected directly from both whole blood and dried blood spots from clinical samples. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 93-100% compared with PCR performed on purified Plasmodium DNA.
The methodology described facilitates high-throughput testing of blood samples collected in the field by fluorescence-based real-time PCR. This method can be applied to a broad range of clinical studies with the advantages of immediate sample testing, lower experimental costs and time-savings.
The availability of sensitive diagnostic tools for malaria is critical to ensure appropriate treatment for patients and to preserve the lifespan of effective anti-malarials. In the field, the most common tools for malaria diagnosis are microscopy and rapid detection tests (RDTs), which are performed directly from the blood sample. Molecular methods that amplify and detect Plasmodium DNA using specific reagents and platforms, such as real-time PCR, provide far greater sensitivity, but are not yet usable at the point-of-care. However, these methods have important applications in clinical research studies that involve the analysis of blood samples collected in the field, including genotyping parasite populations and monitoring drug resistance, genetic characterization of vaccine candidates, anti-malarial efficacy trials and surveillance programs [1–3].
The performance of molecular tests largely depends on the quality of the parasite DNA. Highly purified DNA requires laborious sample processing and costly reagents, kits or equipment, whereas cruder extraction methods often produce DNA that is insufficiently pure for downstream testing. The presence of PCR inhibitors from the blood, such as haemoglobin, reduces the efficiency of the molecular reaction and compromises sensitivity [4, 5]. However, the discovery of DNA polymerases that are resistant to PCR inhibition enables DNA to be amplified from blood without prior extraction. For malaria, this was recently demonstrated using the Phusion™ enzyme which amplifies DNA by nested PCR directly from dried blood spots on filter papers .
One of the major advances in molecular diagnostics is the integration of fluorescence-based detection of DNA in real-time PCR. This poses a new challenge to direct PCR from blood as fluorophores are quenched in the presence of haemoglobin. Amplification can be achieved, but the product is not detected. One approach to overcome the quenching effect uses inhibitor-resistant Taq mutants in combination with an enhancer cocktail within the PCR master mix for optimal amplification and fluorescence detection [7, 8]. With these reagents, real-time PCR can be performed even with 25% blood volume in the PCR reaction . The usefulness of this method was evaluated for the direct detection of Plasmodium DNA by real-time PCR from raw patient samples and from dried blood spots collected in the field.
DNA for optimization of the PCR from blood was purified from Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 in vitro culture  using DNAzol according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA). Parasite gDNA was spiked into negative blood. Negative samples (n = 7) were collected from healthy volunteers with no recent history of travel to malaria endemic areas. Blood samples from febrile patients with suspected malaria (n = 67) were obtained from the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health in Edmonton, Canada, between 2008 and 2011 following diagnosis by microscopy and routine testing by real-time PCR . Of these samples, 57 were smear positive with parasitaemias ranging from < 0.01% to 9.2%; 25 of the samples had a parasitaemia < 0.1%. Microscopy was performed in regional laboratories and parasitaemias were determined from the analysis of thin smears. Two of the smear-negative samples were positive by RDT. Samples from refugees (n = 25) were collected within two weeks of arrival in Canada as part of a separate research study. All subjects were asymptomatic for malaria. Samples were first screened by microscopy and tested retrospectively by real-time PCR as reported . Of the total clinical samples tested, the following species were detected by real-time PCR: Plasmodium falciparum (n = 39), Plasmodium vivax (n = 23), Plasmodium ovale (n = 9), and Plasmodium malariae (n = 2). Blood samples were collected in EDTA or citrate tubes, stored at -20°C and thawed at 4°C prior to testing. Genomic DNA from Plasmodium knowlesi was obtained from MR4.
Dried blood spots were prepared on 3 MM paper (Whatman) from blood samples collected from patients who attended the malaria clinic at Puerto Libertador, in Cordoba, Colombia between 2008 and 2010. Filter papers were dried at ambient temperature in the field, shipped to Medellín and stored in plastic bags at -20°C. Positive patients were symptomatic for malaria and had infections ranging from 120-39,920 parasites/μL (median value of 4763 parasites/μL) by microscopy performed on thick smears in the field. To confirm the presence of Plasmodium DNA, DNA was extracted using Chelex ® 100 (Sigma) and tested by nested PCR according to the protocol described by Snounou et al. Of the 48 samples, 20 were positive for Plasmodium falciparum, 18 were positive for Plasmodium vivax and 10 were negative by microscopy and nested PCR. For real-time PCR, 1.5 mm diameter blood spots were excised from filter papers using a sterilized hole punch. Spots were tested directly or soaked first for 3 minutes in sterile distilled water at 50°C. This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta and Comité de Bioética, Sede de Investigación Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia (Acta 07-32-126) in Colombia.
Real-time PCR and melt curve analysis from blood
PCR was performed as described  in a 20 μL reaction containing 1× PCR Enhancement Cocktail (PEC-1), 1× Omni Klentaq buffer, 0.3 μL of OKT polymerase (all from DNA Polymerase technologies, St. Louis, USA), 200 μM dNTPs, 0-40× SYBR® Green (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA), and blood at 5-10% of the total reaction volume. To detect the 18S rRNA gene from all species of Plasmodium, primers reported by Kamau et al  (forward 5'-GCTCTTTCTTGATTTCTTGGATG-3' and reverse 5'-AGCAGGTTAAGATCTCGTTCG-3') were used at 200 nM concentrations. Published primers were used for species-specific real-time PCR detection of Plasmodium falciparum (5' PLF, 3'FAR; ), Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae (rVIV, rOVA, and rMAL primers; [12, 15]). A new Plasmodium ovale reverse primer (Po260; 5'-GGCAAATGCTTTCGCAGTTGT-3') with reduced primer-dimer interactions was substituted for the rOVA reverse primer. Primers were used at 400 nM except the Plasmodium malariae set, which was used at 800 nM. Real-time PCR was performed on the ABI 7500 Fast system (Applied Biosystems, USA) with the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 58°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min. This was followed by the default dissociation cycle for melt curve analysis.
All samples were tested in triplicate. For whole blood samples, the baseline was set to cycles 3-15 and the threshold was set to 20,000 fluorescence units. Samples were considered negative if the cycle threshold (Ct) value was greater than 35 or if the melt curve did not align with the positive control. For dried blood spots, the baseline was set to 5-15 and the threshold was set to 250,000 to overcome the high background fluorescence from the filter paper itself. The amplification curves generated were sometimes shallow with some variability among replicates. Samples were considered positive when at least two of the three replicates had amplification curves that crossed the threshold before cycle 35 and had the expected melt curve profile. Panel samples were tested in a blind fashion.
Optimization of fluorescence detection from blood
The melt curve profiles were also affected by the concentration of SYBR® Green in the reaction. With increasing concentrations of dye, peak heights increased, thereby improving detection of the PCR product (Figure 1, right panels). At 40× SYBR® Green, the melt curves were most consistent for the different blood volumes and had the highest peak heights. The fluorescence in the negative control (uninfected blood) was negligeable at this concentration. In subsequent experiments, 40× SYBR® Green and 5% blood volume were selected as the optimal reaction conditions.
Detection of Plasmodium from clinical samples
Detection from dried blood spots
Validation of the assay for Plasmodium
Validation of real-time PCR from blood using blind clinical samples
(n = 100)
Dried blood spots†
(n = 48)
Microscopy results were available for 95/100 samples, 57 of which were positive with parasitaemias ranging from < 0.01% to 9.2%. Of these, 25 samples had an undetermined parasitaemia < 0.1%. Four of the false negative samples in the direct blood panel were from asymptomatic refugees and the fifth was from an acute malaria sample. All five samples were negative by microscopy.
For dried blood spots, patient samples collected in the field in Colombia were tested in a blind panel that consisted of 38 positives and 10 negatives (Table 1). The identity of the samples was confirmed by nested PCR on purified gDNA extracted from the blood spots performed in Colombia using the method of Snounou et al. The panel was tested by adding the filter paper spots directly into the real-time PCR master mix. The concordance of the assay with nested PCR on purified DNA was 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were also 100%.
This report describes a methodology for DNA amplification directly from blood that is compatible with fluorescence detection by real-time PCR. Although this method cannot be used directly in the field, it facilitates the analysis of blood samples collected in field studies. Clinical trials on antimalarial or vaccine efficacy and prevalence or surveillance studies are just a few examples of applications of this test for high throughput analysis of blood samples. Either blood spots or whole blood samples can be transported to the lab and immediately tested by real-time PCR without the need for DNA extraction.
This method is particularly suited to studies seeking a rapid confirmation of malaria. The sensitivity is similar to real-time PCR performed on purified DNA and specificity is achieved through primer design to reduce non-specific amplification. At the Alberta ProvLab, malaria diagnosis is confirmed by a TaqMan real-time PCR assay that uses a previously published primer set for the Plasmodium screening reaction . The primers from this assay were initially tested in the assay described here for real-time PCR from blood. Although amplification of Plasmodium DNA was achieved with these primers with good sensitivity, sporadic non-specific amplification was observed in the negative controls. Use of the primers recently published by Kamau et al.  reduced the formation of non-specific products. For some of the species identification reactions, improvements to the primer design may further reduce non-specific products that are detected as very late amplification curves. Furthermore, primers can be designed to produce amplicons with different melting curves for each species which would enable the species to be identified in a single multiplex reaction and further reduce the cost per test.
In general, the background fluorescence in this assay is higher than in other real-time PCR assays; the high concentration of SYBR® Green required to overcome the quenching effect from the blood results in higher background fluorescence and the threshold was set at 20,000 or greater for these assays. With blood spots, fluorescence from the filter paper itself resulted in even higher background. Therefore, preliminary testing with blank filter papers and spots of uninfected blood is highly recommended to define the Tm and expected melt curve for a positive sample relative to background. Once this is established, the interpretation of results is straight-forward. Another important consideration is that the real-time PCR must be performed in tubes and not capillaries. Preliminary testing in capillaries on the LightCycler instrument from whole blood samples failed to generate amplification curves. It is hypothesized that during the course of the PCR, dried blood accumulates along the walls of the capillaries and blocks the emission of fluorescence.
In addition to the detection of Plasmodium DNA in blood, the reagents for direct PCR can also support the detection of other blood-borne pathogens. These reagents have previously been used to detect herpes simplex virus 2 and other viruses spiked into blood . In malaria-endemic countries, the diagnosis of non-malarial causes of fever is critical to prevent morbidity and mortality, particularly from bacterial infections. A recent meta-analysis identified Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae as the major causes of bloodstream infections in African children . The PCR test described here could be developed to detect these other organisms directly from blood samples.
In addition to the practical use of this assay for the qualitative analysis of field samples, the ability to perform real-time PCR for malaria directly from blood can be exploited in new technologies to bring molecular diagnostics for malaria to the point-of-care . A number of technologies have been reported but they generally require an upstream module for DNA extraction [3, 19, 20]. Using the methodology described, this step can be omitted and samples can be immediately processed for diagnostic testing.
The methodology described here supports the amplification of gDNA by fluorescence-based real-time PCR directly from blood samples infected with malaria. The advantage of this assay is the elimination of the DNA extraction step, thereby facilitating high-throughput analysis of samples collected in the field using state-of-the-art tools for the detection and characterization of Plasmodium infections.
We thank Sandra Shokoples for laboratory assistance and Severiano Velazquez for field collection assistance. We are grateful to Dr. John Crabtree and Dr. Linda Pilarski for comments on the manuscript. The following reagents were obtained through the MR4: genomic DNA from Plasmodium knowlesi H strain and Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 malaria parasites contributed by D. J. Carucci. This work was supported by an Interdisciplinary Team Grant from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Colciencias (contract RC 238-2007) and the Universidad de Antioquia.
- Wilson PE, Alker AP, Meshnick SR: Real-time PCR methods for monitoring antimalarial drug resistance. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21: 278-283. 10.1016/j.pt.2005.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felger I, Genton B, Smith T, Tanner M, Beck HP: Molecular monitoring in malaria vaccine trials. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19: 60-63. 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)00066-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkes M, Kain KC: Advances in malaria diagnosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007, 5: 485-495. 10.1586/1478718.104.22.1685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Soud WA, Radstrom P: Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 485-493. 10.1128/JCM.39.2.485-493.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radstrom P, Knutsson R, Wolffs P, Lovenklev M, Lofstrom C: Pre-PCR processing: strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples. Mol Biotechnol. 2004, 26: 133-146. 10.1385/MB:26:2:133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuehrer HP, Fally MA, Habler VE, Starzengruber P, Swoboda P, Noedl H: Novel nested direct PCR technique for malaria diagnosis using filter paper samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2011, 49: 1628-1630. 10.1128/JCM.01792-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kermekchiev MB, Kirilova LI, Vail EE, Barnes WM: Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: e40-10.1093/nar/gkn1055.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Kermekchiev MB, Barnes WM: Direct DNA amplification from crude clinical samples using a PCR enhancer cocktail and novel mutants of Taq. J Mol Diagn. 2010, 12: 152-161. 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090070.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trager W, Jensen JB: Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976, 193: 673-675. 10.1126/science.781840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shokoples SE, Ndao M, Kowalewska-Grochowska K, Yanow SK: Multiplexed real-time PCR assay for discrimination of Plasmodium species with improved sensitivity for mixed infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 975-980. 10.1128/JCM.01858-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matisz CE, Naidu P, Shokoples SE, Grice D, Krinke V, Brown SZ, Kowalewska-Grochowska K, Houston S, Yanow SK: Post-arrival screening for malaria in asymptomatic refugees using real-time PCR. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011, 84: 161-165. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0494.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario VE, Thaithong S, Brown KN: High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993, 61: 315-320. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90077-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamau E, Tolbert LS, Kortepeter L, Pratt M, Nyakoe N, Muringo L, Ogutu B, Waitumbi JN, Ockenhouse CF: Development of a highly sensitive genus-specific quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR assay for detection and quantitation of Plasmodium by amplifying RNA and DNA of the 18S rRNA genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2011, 49: 2946-2953. 10.1128/JCM.00276-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rubio JM, Benito A, Roche J, Berzosa PJ, Garcia ML, Mico M, Edu M, Alvar J: Semi-nested, multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of human malaria parasites and evidence of Plasmodium vivax infection in Equatorial Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 60: 183-187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Monbrison F, Angei C, Staal A, Kaiser K, Picot S: Simultaneous identification of the four human Plasmodium species and quantification of Plasmodium DNA load in human blood by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97: 387-390. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90065-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rougemont M, Van Saanen M, Sahli R, Hinrikson HP, Bille J, Jaton K: Detection of four Plasmodium species in blood from humans by 18S rRNA gene subunit-based and species-specific real-time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 5636-5643. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5636-5643.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reddy EA, Shaw AV, Crump JA: Community-acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 417-432. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70072-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atrazhev A, Manage DP, Stickel AJ, Crabtree HJ, Pilarski LM, Acker JP: In-gel technology for PCR genotyping and pathogen detection. Anal Chem. 2010, 82: 8079-8087. 10.1021/ac1013157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gascoyne P, Satayavivad J, Ruchirawat M: Microfluidic approaches to malaria detection. Acta Trop. 2004, 89: 357-369. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.11.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yager P, Domingo GJ, Gerdes J: Point-of-care diagnostics for global health. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008, 10: 107-144. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160524.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.