Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum of the molecular forms M and S of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis

Malaria Journal volume 10, Article number: 269 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The different taxa belonging to Anopheles gambiae complex display phenotypic differences that may impact their contribution to malaria transmission. More specifically, their susceptibility to infection, resulting from a co-evolution between parasite and vector, might be different. The aim of this study was to compare the susceptibility of M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis to infection by Plasmodium falciparum.

Methods

F3 progenies of Anopheles gambiae s.l. collected in Senegal were infected, using direct membrane feeding, with P. falciparum gametocyte-containing blood sampled on volunteer patients. The presence of oocysts was determined by light microscopy after 7 days, and the presence of sporozoite by ELISA after 14 days. Mosquito species and molecular forms were identified by PCR.

Results

The oocyst rate was significantly higher in the molecular S form (79.07%) than in the M form (57.81%, Fisher's exact test p < 0.001) and in Anopheles arabiensis (55.38%, Fisher's exact test vs. S group p < 0.001). Mean ± s.e.m. number of oocyst was greater in the An. gambiae S form (1.72 ± 0.26) than in the An. gambiae M form (0.64 ± 0.04, p < 0.0001) and in the An. arabiensis group (0.58 ± 0.04, vs. S group, p < 0.0001). Sporozoite rate was also higher in the molecular form S (83.52%) than in form M (50.98%, Fisher's exact test p < 0.001) and Anopheles arabiensis 50.85%, Fisher's exact test vs. S group p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Infected in the same experimental conditions, the molecular form S of An. gambiae is more susceptible to infection by P. falciparum than the molecular form M of An. gambiae and An. arabiensis.

Background

Plasmodium falciparum, the deadliest agent of human malaria, is exclusively transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes. In Africa, species belonging to the Anopheles gambiae complex are responsible for a large proportion of malaria cases. This complex is composed of species morphologically identical but distinct in their distribution, ecology and contribution in malaria transmission. While Anopheles merus, Anopheles melas, Anopheles bwambae and Anopheles quadriannulatus have sporadic or null role in malaria transmission due to restricted geographical distribution and/or zoophily, Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis are the most important in terms of epidemiology [1, 2]. Anopheles gambiae s.s. itself was shown to be subdivided in incipient species, namely M and S molecular forms [3], both vectors of malaria parasites [4, 5]. Although these three taxa coexist in many zones, as in Senegal [4], they have specific ecological niches and one species can be predominant on the others depending on the environmental conditions [6, 7]. Especially at the larval stage, an habitat segregation has been demonstrated between M and S molecular forms [8]. The biological differences between the incipient species most likely impact their vectorial capacity and their contribution in malaria transmission [9]. A complete understanding of their role in malaria transmission would however not be possible without deciphering their relative susceptibility to the parasites.

The susceptibility of Anopheles mosquitoes to Plasmodium infection reflects the probability of successful parasite development from gamete fertilization to sporozoite production. During the sporogonic development steps in the mosquito midgut lumen, epithelium and haemolymph, parasites face a hostile environment, leading to a considerable reduction in the number of parasites reaching the oocyst stage [10–12]. The mosquito susceptibility is the result of evolutionary process on both parasite and vector that maintains susceptible and refractoriness alleles in natural populations [13]. Recently, a new cryptic sub-group inside An. gambiae s.s., named 'Goundry', was identified [14]. The exophilic behaviour of the taxa explains that it was not sampled before in dwellings. This new vector may have major importance in malaria transmission as it was found to be more susceptible to infection that the endophilic vectors. This finding highlighted that sibling species can have different levels of vector competence, which with regards to their vectorial capacity, will define their role in malaria transmission. Unfortunately, the study did not compare susceptibility of the already known species in the An. gambiae complex.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential difference in susceptibility of the three malaria vectors of the An. gambiae complex in Senegal to infection by wild isolates of P. falciparum from the same area, using an in vitro model of infection.

Methods

Mosquito collection

Anopheles gambiae s.s. larvae were collected in five different breeding sites (minimum 100 larvae per site) in the village of Dielmo (13°43'N, 16°24'W). Larvae were raised until emergence; adults were fed on rabbit blood and 100 females (F0) randomly selected (20 from each collection site). An. arabiensis larvae were sampled in one site in Dakar (14°72'N, 17°31'W). Larvae were also raised until emergence, fed on rabbit blood and 100 females (F0) randomly selected. Each F0 females was allowed to lays its eggs individually, before it was genotyped for the species and molecular forms by PCR-RFLP [15]. According to the experiment, among the 100 selected An. gambiae, 44 to 54 were molecular form M and 43 to 52 molecular form S (a few An. arabiensis identified were discarded). All specimens sampled in Dakar were confirmed to be An. arabiensis. The offspring of F0 females of the same taxa were then pooled and bred together in the same conditions for the three groups. Larvae were fed with Tetramin fish food. Pupae were collected and placed in 10-L plastic buckets, which were covered with mosquito gauze and provided with a cotton sleeve for easy access to 10% glucose on filter paper. Adults were maintained in a room at 27°C, 70% relative humidity and 12:12 h light/darkness, with a 30-mn dawn and dusk light regimen. In order to increase the proportion of mosquitoes accustomed to feeding on membrane, a selection of aggressive F1 and F2 females was performed. F3 females used for infection were all genotyped and species and molecular forms were confirmed.

Gametocyte carriers

Gametocyte carriers were detected by cross-sectional surveys in villages and schools, during the high transmission period from September to November 2006 in Hanene, (14°47'N, 16°55'W Thies region). Informed consent was obtained from adults or legal guardians of minors. Fingerprick blood was taken from each volunteer. The thick blood smears were stained with 10% Giemsa and examined microscopically with (100×) oil immersion lens for the presence of sexual and asexual parasites. Parasite density was estimated by counting against 1,000 white blood cells and converted to numbers of parasites per μL by assuming a standard white blood cell count of 8,000/μL. Symptomatic or non symptomatic individuals having an asexual density exceeding 1,000 parasites/mm3 were treated with artemisinin-based combination therapy according to national recommendations. Inclusion criteria of gametocyte carriers were: (1) age over 10 years; (2) a P. falciparum gametocyte density over 20/mm3 of blood; and (3) no anti-malarial treatment in the previous month. 6 mL of blood were drawn from the gametocyte carriers in a heparinised vacutainer tube. An insecticide-impregnated bed net was given to the participating individuals as compensation. This study was approved by the Senegalese National Ethical Committee.

Direct membrane feeding assay

Experimental infections were carried out by direct membrane feeding assays as described by Mulder et al [16]. Blood was rapidly distributed to three pools of three-days old females belonging to each taxa, through a warm-water (37°C) jacketed membrane feeder serially connected. Female mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 15 min before, partially fed and non-fed specimens were removed. Two batches of 50 mosquitoes of each taxa were randomly-selected from among fed females and maintained in the insectary under 10% sucrose diet for further analyses. The first batch of mosquitoes was dissected seven days later. Midguts were stained with 3% mercurochrome in PBS, and examined under light microscopy (40 × objective) for detection and quantification of oocysts. The percentage of oocyst-positive mosquitoes and number of oocysts were recorded. A second batch of mosquitoes were used to evaluated the presence of circumsporozoite protein (CSP) of P. falciparum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)[17] performed on heads and thoraces 14 days after feeding. PCR RFLP [15] were performed on the carcasses of dissected mosquitoes and the identification of molecular forms were confirmed.

Experiments were repeated four times with different samples of gametocyte-containing blood. Gametocytaemia was 413, 574, 597 and 866 gametocytes per μL, respectively for experiments 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Statistical analysis

Mortality rates were calculated after 7 and 14 days in each group. The number of oocyst was compared using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests. Mortality rates, percentage of infected mosquito at oocyst and sporozoite stages were compared using Pearson Chi2 or Fisher exact test. Correlation between the number of oocyst and the gametocytemia was analysed using Spearman test. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata® 10.1. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered as significant.

Ethical approval

Experiments involving human subjects, population screenings as well as collection of blood samples, have been conducted in full accordance with ethical principles. Free and informed consent of the donors or their guardians was obtained at all times while community consent had been obtained beforehand. This study was approved by the Ethical National Comity of Senegal.

Results

Oocysts rates

From the 600 fed mosquitoes used for oocyst analysis, 559 survived for seven days and were included in the analysis. Mortality rates was significantly higher in An. gambiae S group (14%) than in the An. arabiensis group (2.5%) and in the An. gambiae M group (4%) (Fisher exact p < 0.001 and p = 0.001 respectively).

The parasite infection rates at oocyst stage in each group are presented in the Figure 1A. In each experiment, there was a significant difference between groups (Pearson Chi2 p ranging from 0.002 to 0.027) with An. gambiae S group being significantly more infected than An. gambiae M group in experiment 1 and 4 (Fisher's test p = 0.048 and 0.001 respectively), but not in experiment 2 and 3 (Fisher's test p = 0.064 and 0.086 respectively). Anopheles gambiae S group was significantly more infected than An. arabiensis group in experiment 1, 2 and 3 (Fisher's test p = 0.006, 0.001 and 0.007 respectively), but not in experiment 4 (Fisher's test p = 0.078). When analysed globally for all the four experiments, infection rate was higher in the An. gambiae S group (79.07%) than in the two other groups (55.38% for An. arabiensis and 57.81% for An. gambiae M respectively, Fisher's exact test p < 0.001 for each). On the other hand no significant difference was found between An. arabiensis and An. gambiae M groups (Fisher exact test p = 0.29).

Figure 1
figure 1

Oocyst (Panel A) and CSP rates (Panel B) with 95% confidence interval, observed during experiments 1 to 4 (EXP 1 to EXP 4) in the three species and molecular forms. Number of mosquitoes studied (surviving) and positive as well as Pearson Chi2 and corresponding p value are give in the table.

Full size image

The maximal number of oocyst was much greater in the An. gambiae S group (36), than in the two other groups (two in both). The distribution of oocyst number in each group is represented in Figure 2. The mean number of oocyst was variable across different groups in each experiment (Kruskall Wallis Chi2 ranging from 0.0001 to 0.01), as well as globally for all experiments (p < 0.0001). When analysing all experiments globally, the number of oocyst was greater in the An. gambiae S group (1.72 ± 0.26) than in the An. arabiensis group (0.58 ± 0.04, Kruskall Wallis test p < 0.0001) and An. gambiae M group (0.64 ± 0.04, Kruskall Wallis test p < 0.0001). There was a significant although very weak correlation between the number of oocyst and the gametocytemia (Spearman test rho = -0.11, p = 0.01).

Figure 2
figure 2

Distribution of oocysts in An. arabiensis (A), An. gambiae molecular form M (M) and An. gambiae molecular form S (S) in experiment 1 to 4. Boxes are 25th to 75th percentiles, lines 1.5 interquartile and dots outside values. Mean, standard deviation and median as well as Kruskall Wallis (K-W) and corresponding P value are given in the table.

Full size image

Circumsporozoite protein rates

From the 600 fed mosquitoes used for CSP analysis, 311 survived for 14 days. Mortality rates were significantly higher in the An. gambiae S group (54.5%) than in the An. arabiensis group (41%, Fisher's exact test p = 0.005). The mortality of An. gambiae M group (49%) was not significantly different from the mortality in other groups (Fishers test p = 0.07 vs. An. Arabiensis and 0.16 vs. An. gambiae S group).

The parasite infection rates at sporozoite stage in each group are presented in Figure 1 panel B. In each experiment, there was a significant difference between groups (Pearson Chi2 p ranging from 0.002 to 0.04) with An. gambiae S group being significantly more infected than An. gambiae M group in experiment 1, 3 and 4 (Fisher's test p = 0.001, 0.048 and 0.012 respectively) but not in experiment 2 (Fisher's test p = 0.101) and An. gambiae S group being significantly more infected than An. arabiensis group in experiment 1, 2 and 3 (Fisher's test p = 0.002, 0.003 and 0.017 respectively) but not in experiment 4 (Fisher's test p = 0.167). When analysed globally for all the four experiments, infection rate was higher in the An. gambiae S group (83.52%) than in the two other groups (50.85% for An. arabiensis and 50.98% for An. gambiae M respectively, Fisher's exact test p < 0.001 for each). On the other hand no significant difference was found between An. arabiensis and An. gambiae M groups (Fisher exact test p = 0.55).

Discussion

This study is the first to evaluate the relative susceptibility of three major malaria vectors of the An. gambiae complex. It demonstrates that, in our experimental conditions, An. gambiae molecular form S is more susceptible than An. gambiae molecular form M and An. arabiensis to infection by Plasmodium falciparum at both oocyst and sporozoite stage.

Malaria transmission is known to depend on relationships that bind the pathogen, its invertebrate (vector) and vertebrate host (man). It is a complex phenomenon that implicates intrinsic factors associated with each actor as well as interactions between them [13]. The present study focused on the intrinsic capacity of the anopheline vector to be infected. This is the reason why it was performed on an in vitro model of mosquito infection that allowed a specific study of the ability of each vector to be infected [16]. Most extrinsic factors and parameters depending on the parasite and on the human host were controlled. As a matter of fact, in each experiment performed, the same parasite isolate was present in the same blood sample. The impact of environmental factors was also controlled since all the feeding experiments were conducted in uniform laboratory conditions. The results demonstrate that, these experimental conditions, the rate of infection was higher in molecular form S than in M form and An. arabiensis at both oocyst and sporozoite stages. The intensity of the infection was also higher in S form than M form and An. arabiensis as shown by higher mean number of oocyst. Although variations in infection rate and intensity were observed in the different experiments (representing the variability of parasitological and human factors), a similar difference between taxa was detected. This indicates that species and molecular forms belonging to An. gambiae complex did not display the same behaviour toward infection by P. falciparum. The difference observed between molecular forms M and S of An. gambiae and An. arabiensis was only related to their intrinsic susceptibility to P. falciparum infection. It is important to consider that although the method used for this study is the best available to evaluate susceptibility, it necessitates breeding mosquitoes in the insectary. Tested specimens belonged to the 3rd generation and have, therefore, adapted to laboratory conditions. They may not be exactly representative of field populations.

During this study, mortality rate was different between species and forms. Although this parameter was not specifically studied, since all mosquitoes were potentially infected, mortality may have been influenced by the intensity of the infection. Plasmodium infection has been shown to reduce vector survival in laboratory conditions [18]. In this study, An. gambiae S form mosquitoes which were the most infected were also the less surviving at both oocyst and sporozoite stage. Even though many parameters have to be taken into consideration when evaluating malaria transmission in the field, the most efficient vector will be the one mostly highly infected and longest lived. The divergence of these two parameters among An. gambiae S and M forms could explain why dynamics studies of transmission have failed to demonstrated a difference between M and S forms [4, 5]. The mechanisms responsible for parasite-induced mortality should be closely evaluated and taken into account in future anti-vectorial strategies.

The outcome of infection depends on the balance between the vector immune response, that aims to limit the infection [19, 20], and the ability of the parasite to evade them [13]. The observed difference in susceptibility level among anopheles species to Plasmodium infection could be related to various levels of immune response of the vector. A variety of genes implicated in the immune response of the vector have been identified [21, 22] and their allelic variants associated to relative refractoriness to infection [23]. A study on the repartition of the allelic variant of these gens in the different taxa inside An. gambiae complex could highlight their potential role in the difference susceptibility observed in this study. Beyond the M and S classification, the individual variation of susceptibility is a factor that should be investigated. The selection of resistant individuals may leads to refractory mechanisms at the molecular level, which could be exploited in the development of novel approaches to malaria control.

Susceptibility is known to increase with frequent and intense contact between parasite and vector because of evolution pressure of the parasite on the host [13]. This co-adaptation is also known to be dependent on the environment. Therefore, it would be interesting to study the relative susceptibility of molecular form M and S of An. gambiae from other areas or even their susceptibility to Plasmodium strains from distant regions. Interestingly, a large range of oocyst number was observed in experiment 2 in An. gambiae molecular form S. In the future, the relative variability of the susceptibility in the different taxa should be investigated.

Conclusions

In the context of ecological speciation, this study is the first to demonstrate a difference between the molecular forms M and S of An. gambiae susceptibility for P. falciparum using an in vitro infection method. Infected in the same experimental conditions, molecular form S exhibited a higher susceptibility to infection by P. falciparum than molecular form M and An. arabiensis.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Coetzee M, Craig M, le Sueur D: Distribution of African malaria mosquitoes belonging to the Anopheles gambiae complex. Parasitol Today. 2000, 16: 74-77. 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01563-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fontenille D, Simard F: Unravelling complexities in human malaria transmission dynamics in Africa through a comprehensive knowledge of vector populations. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004, 27: 357-375. 10.1016/j.cimid.2004.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. della Torre A, Fanello C, Akogbeto M, Dossou-Yovo J, Favia G, Petrarca V, Coluzzi M: Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa. Insect Molec Biol. 2001, 10: 9-18. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ndiath MO, Brengues C, Konate L, Sokhna C, Boudin C, Trape JF, Fontenille D: Dynamics of transmission of Plasmodium falciparum by Anopheles arabiensis and the molecular forms M and S of Anopheles gambiae in Dielmo, Senegal. Malar J. 2008, 7: 136-10.1186/1475-2875-7-136.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wondji C, Simard F, Petrarca V, Etang J, Santolamazza F, della Torre A, Fontenille D: Species and populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Cameroon with special emphasis on chromosomal and molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s. J Med Entomol. 2005, 42: 998-1005. 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0998:SAPOTA]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simard F, Ayala D, Kamdem GC, Pombi M, Etouna J, Ose K, Fotsing JM, Fontenille D, Besansky NJ, Costantini C: Ecological niche partitioning between Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in Cameroon: the ecological side of speciation. BMC Ecol. 9: 17-

  7. Costantini C, Ayala D, Guelbeogo WM, Pombi M, Some CY, Bassole IH, Ose K, Fotsing JM, Sagnon N, Fontenille D, Besansky NJ, Simard F: Living at the edge: biogeographic patterns of habitat segregation conform to speciation by niche expansion in Anopheles gambiae. BMC Ecol. 9: 16-

  8. Gimonneau G, Pombi M, Choisy M, Morand S, Dabire RK, Simard F: Larval habitat segregation between the molecular forms of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae in a rice field area of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lehmann T, Diabate A: The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: A phenotypic perspective. Infect Genet Evol. 2008, 8: 737-746. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.003.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaughan JA, Hensley L, Beier JC: Sporogonic development of Plasmodium yoelii in five anopheline species. J Parasitol. 1994, 80: 674-681. 10.2307/3283245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gouagna LC, Mulder B, Noubissi E, Tchuinkam T, Verhave JP, Boudin C: The early sporogonic cycle of Plasmodium falciparum in laboratory-infected Anopheles gambiae: an estimation of parasite efficacy. Trop Med Int Health. 1998, 3: 21-28. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00156.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaughan JA, Noden BH, Beier JC: Sporogonic Development of Cultured Plasmodium-Falciparum in 6 Species of Laboratory-Reared Anopheles Mosquitos. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 51: 233-243.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohuet A, Harris C, Robert V, Fontenille D: Evolutionary forces on Anopheles: what makes a malaria vector?. Trends Parasitol. 2010, 26: 130-136. 10.1016/j.pt.2009.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riehle MM, Guelbeogo WM, Gneme A, Eiglmeier K, Holm I, Bischoff E, Garnier T, Snyder GM, Li XZ, Markianos K, Sagnon N, Vernick KD: A Cryptic Subgroup of Anopheles gambiae is highly susceptible to human malaria parasites. Science. 2011, 331: 596-598. 10.1126/science.1196759.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fanello C, Santolamazza F, della TA: Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP. Med Vet Entomol. 2002, 16: 461-464. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00393.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mulder B, Lensen T, Tchuinkam T, Roeffen W, Verhave JP, Boudin C, Sauerwein R: Plasmodium falciparum: Membrane feeding assays and competition ELISAs for the measurement of transmission reduction in sera from Cameroon. Exp Parasitol. 1999, 92: 81-86. 10.1006/expr.1999.4398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burkot TR, Williams JL, Schneider I: Identification of Plasmodium-Falciparum-infected mosquitos by a double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent-assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984, 33: 783-788.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson HM, Read AF: Why is the effect of malaria parasites on mosquito survival still unresolved?. Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18: 256-261. 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02281-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinden RE, Alavi Y, Raine JD: Mosquito-malaria interactions: a reappraisal of the concepts of susceptibility and refractoriness. Insect Biochem Molec Biol. 2004, 34: 625-629. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris C, Lambrechts L, Rousset F, Abate L, Nsango SE, Fontenille D, Morlais I, Cohuet A: Polymorphisms in Anopheles gambiae immune genes associated with natural resistance to Plasmodium falciparum. Plos Pathog. 2010, 6: e1001112-10.1371/journal.ppat.1001112.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendes AM, Schlegelmilch T, Cohuet A, Awono-Ambene P, De Iorio M, Fontenille D, Morlais I, Christophides GK, Kafatos FC, Vlachou D: Conserved mosquito/parasite interactions affect development of Plasmodium falciparum in Africa. Plos Pathog. 2008, 4: e1000069-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000069.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong YM, Aguilar R, Xi ZY, Warr E, Mongin E, Dimopoulos G: Anopheles gambiae immune responses to human and rodent Plasmodium parasite species. Plos Pathog. 2006, 2: e52-10.1371/journal.ppat.0020052.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. White BJ, Lawniczak MKN, Cheng CD, Coulibaly MB, Wilson MD, Sagnon N, Costantini C, Simard F, Christophides GK, Besansky NJ: Adaptive divergence between incipient species of Anopheles gambiae increases resistance to Plasmodium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 244-249. 10.1073/pnas.1013648108.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Charles Bouganali, Moussa Gueye and Moise Gnafouna for their technical assistance, the villagers in Hanene, Sian Clarke for the correction of the manuscript and Didier Fontenille and Isabelle Morlais for their help in the conception of the study.

Funding

This work was supported by the program Pal + of the French Ministry of Research and the Department Support and Formation of the south communities of the Research Institute for the Development (IRD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes (URMITE), IRD, BP 1386, Dakar, Sénégal

    Mamadou O Ndiath, Ablaye Gaye, Catherine Mazenot, Christian Boudin, Cheikh Sokhna & Jean-François Trape

  2. Maladies infectieuses et vecteurs: écologie, génétique, évolution et contrôle (MIVEGEC), (UM1-CNRS 5290-IRD 224), IRD-IRSS, 01 BP 171, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

    Anna Cohuet

  3. Laboratoire Ecologie Vectorielle et Parasitaire, UCAD, BP 5005, Fann Dakar, Sénégal

    Ablaye Gaye, Lassana Konate & Ousmane Faye

Authors
  1. Mamadou O Ndiath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Cohuet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ablaye Gaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lassana Konate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Catherine Mazenot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ousmane Faye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christian Boudin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Cheikh Sokhna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jean-François Trape
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamadou O Ndiath.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

MON, JFT, CS and CB have equally contributed to the design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. LK, AG and CS contributed to the conception of study and to the analysis of entomological data. AC performed field activities and molecular biology study. OF designed the study protocol. MON, CM and AC drafted the manuscript. CS provided the scientific supervision in Dielmo and Hanene. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ndiath, M.O., Cohuet, A., Gaye, A. et al. Comparative susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum of the molecular forms M and S of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis. Malar J 10, 269 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-269

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us