Open Access

In vitro susceptibility to pyrimethamine of DHFR I164L single mutant Plasmodium falciparum

  • Valérie Andriantsoanirina1, 2Email author,
  • Rémy Durand2,
  • Bruno Pradines3,
  • Eric Baret3,
  • Christiane Bouchier4,
  • Arsène Ratsimbasoa5 and
  • Didier Ménard1, 6
Malaria Journal201110:283

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-283

Received: 18 May 2011

Accepted: 27 September 2011

Published: 27 September 2011

Abstract

Background

Recently, Plasmodium falciparum parasites bearing Pfdhfr I164L single mutation were found in Madagascar. These new mutants may challenge the use of antifolates for the intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp). Assays with transgenic bacteria suggested that I164L parasites have a wild-type phenotype for pyrimethamine but it had to be confirmed by testing the parasites themselves.

Methods

Thirty Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates were collected in 2008 in the south-east of Madagascar. A part of Pfdhfr gene encompassing codons 6 to 206 was amplified by PCR and the determination of the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms was performed by DNA sequencing. The multiplicity of infection was estimated by using an allelic family-specific nested PCR. Isolates that appeared monoclonal were submitted to culture adaptation. Determination of IC50s to pyrimethamine was performed on adapted isolates.

Results

Four different Pfdhfr alleles were found: the 164L single mutant-type (N = 13), the wild-type (N = 7), the triple mutant-type 51I/59R/108N (N = 9) and the double mutant-type 108N/164L (N = 1). Eleven out 30 (36.7%) of P. falciparum isolates were considered as monoclonal infection. Among them, five isolates were successfully adapted in culture and tested for pyrimethamine in vitro susceptibility. The wild-type allele was the most susceptible with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) < 10 nM. The geometric mean of IC50 of the three I164L mutant isolates was 6-fold higher than the wild-type with 61.3 nM (SD = 3.2 nM, CI95%: 53.9-69.7 nM). These values remained largely below the IC50 of the triple mutant parasite (13,804 nM).

Conclusion

The IC50s of the I164L mutant isolates were significantly higher than those of the wild-type (6-fold higher) and close from those usually reported for simple mutants S108N (roughly10-fold higher than wild type). Given the observed values, the determination of IC50s directly on parasites did not confirm what has been found on transgenic bacteria. The prevalence increase of the Pfdhfr I164L single mutant parasite since 2006 could be explained by the selective advantage of this allele under sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine pressure. The emergence of highly resistant alleles should be considered in the future, in particular because an unexpected double mutant-type allele S108N/I164L has been already detected.

Background

Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in endemic areas, affecting mainly African children under five years of age and pregnant women [1]. Currently, in these areas, artemisinin combinations therapy (ACT) is recommended as first-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, while the intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) relies on the administration of antifolate sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) combination. Anti-malarial drugs used for IPTp must be efficacious, safe, tolerable, cheap, and easy to administer, preferably as a single dose [2]. So far, SP is the only drug which has these attributes, despite its decreasing efficiency [3].

Analysis of the molecular basis of anti-malarial drug resistance has demonstrated that mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase genes are associated with development of SP resistance. Resistance to pyrimethamine (PYR) is due to point mutations in the P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase gene (Pfdhfr) [49] and the Pf DHFR S108N point mutation is the main molecular event, followed by stepwise selection of additional mutations in other positions (codons 51, 59 and 164). Several studies have already demonstrated that parasites with a triple-mutant allele (N51I/C59R/S108N) have markedly reduced in vitro susceptibility to PYR, and the presence of the triple-mutation allele increases the risk of SP therapeutic failure [10]. An additional mutation, I164L, confers to the quadruple mutant a high level of resistance to PYR [11], abrogating the clinical efficacy of SP as observed in Southeast Asia and South America [12] but rarely in Africa [13].

In African countries and the Comoros Island, three haplotypes including the I164L allele have been described: both triple mutants N51I/S108N/I164L and C59R/S108N/I164L, and the quadruple mutant [14, 15]. In 2006, a novel I164L single mutant in one field isolate in Madagascar was observed [16]. In 2008, the Pfdhfr I164L polymorphism was prevalent in southern sentinel sites of the Great Island with 8.8% of isolates carrying this mutation [14]. Microsatellite markers analysis showed that this unique allele emerged independently in these sites. Until now, the Pfdhfr I164L allele has not been reported elsewhere in the world. Previous published data have also shown that the triple mutant N51I/C59R/S108N have largely spread in Madagascar but the quadruple mutant has not been reported so far.

In 2009, Lozovsky et al have explored and analysed the possible evolutionary pathways of PYR resistance using experimental systems with transgenic bacteria in which all possible mutational intermediates were created by site-directed mutagenesis (N51I, C59R, S108N, and I164L) in Pf DHFR enzyme [17]. Their findings suggested that P. falciparum parasites harbouring single mutant Pfdhfr I164L (IC50 = 0.29 μg/ml) were as sensitive to PYR as the wild type allele (0.27 μg/ml). This data was not consistent with the observation of the rapid rise in the prevalence of parasites with the single 164L mutation in Madagascar following the massive use of the SP [14].

In this context, the main objective of the study was to assess the PYR in vitro susceptibility of parasites themselves and to compare those harboring the single 164L mutation with those harbouring wild-type and triple-mutant Pfdhfr alleles in order to decipher the epidemiological characteristics of this haplotype.

Methods

Sample collection

Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates were collected in 2008 from patients seeking treatment for malaria at Farafangana Health Centre in the south-east of Madagascar where high prevalence of Pfdhfr I164L single mutant allele was previously observed [18]. All patients with fever were screened with the CareStart© rapid diagnostic test (AccessBio©). Giemsa-stained thin and thick blood films were prepared for each patient with a positive rapid diagnostic test result. The various species of Plasmodium were identified and parasitaemia was assessed by a skilled microscopist. Once informed consent had been obtained from all adults and from at least one parent for minors, 5 ml of venous blood were collected on EDTA tube. Patients with positive microscopy results were promptly treated according to National Malaria Policy. Blood samples were sent to Institut Pasteur, Antananarivo, at +4°C within 24 to 48 h of collection. Giemsa-stained thin blood smears were examined to check for mono-infection with P. falciparum and to determine parasite density. Plasmodium falciparum samples were split into two different aliquots: cryopreserved aliquots stored in liquid nitrogen for culture adaptation and in vitro assays, and fresh blood aliquots stored at -20°C until genomic DNA extraction.

Genomic DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from initial infected blood aliquots and from parasites obtained after culture adaptation, by the phenol-chloroform method [19].

Plasmodium species molecular diagnosis

Parasite species were confirmed in both DNA extracts by real-time PCR, using species-specific primers as described by de Monbrison [20] with a protocol adapted for the RotorGene® 3000 thermocycler (Corbett Life Science®, Sydney, Australia).

Pfdhfr amplification & sequencing

A 600 bp fragment of Pfdhfr gene encompassing codons 6 to 206 was amplified by nested PCR technique on both DNA extracts, as previously described [21]. Sequencing reactions were carried out with a ABI Prism BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit and were run on a model 3730 xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France). Electrophoregrams were visualized and analyzed with CEQ2000 genetic analysis system software (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France). The amino acid sequences were compared with the 3D7 Pf DHFR wild-type amino acid sequence (PFD0830w, GenBank accession number AL844503). The presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms was confirmed by reading both the forward and the reverse strands. Parasites with mixed alleles (in which both wild-type and mutant alleles were present) were considered mutants. Haplotypes for drug resistance markers were reconstructed from the full sequence presenting an unambiguous single allele signal at all positions.

Multiplicity of infection (MOI)

The multiplicity of infection, defined as the highest number of alleles detected at either of the two loci, was estimated by using an allelic family-specific nested PCR (MAD20, K1, and RO33 for Pfmsp-1 and 3D7 and FC27 for Pfmsp-2), as described previously (1). All PCR amplifications of initial infected blood aliquots contained a positive control (genomic DNA from strains W2, HB3, and 3D7) and a negative control (no target DNA). Only samples showing monoclonal P. falciparum infections were selected for culture adaptation.

Culture adaptation and in vitro susceptibility assays

Aliquots preserved in liquid nitrogen were sent to IRBA, Marseille, France, for culture adaptation and assessment of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) to PYR. PYR was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Stock solution was prepared in ethanol. Twofold serial dilutions were prepared in sterile water and distributed in triplicate into Falcon 96-well flat-bottomed plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The 3D7 clone (wild-type Pfdhfr allele) and the W2 Indochina clone (triple mutant-type Pfdhfr allele) were obtained from MR4-ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and used as controls to test the batch of plates.

Determination of the in vitro susceptibility was performed in triplicate on culture adapted isolates and on references strains, using the in vitro isotopic microtest as previously described [22]. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50), i.e., the drug concentration corresponding to 50% of the uptake of [3H] hypoxanthine by the parasites in drug-free control wells, was determined by non-linear regression analysis of log dose-response curves (Riasmart; Packard, Meriden, NJ). Data were analysed after logarithmic transformation and expressed as the geometric mean IC50, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated (Stata 9; StataCorp LP, Texas, USA).

Ethical approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of Madagascar (N°007/SANPF/2007). An informed written consent was provided by the parents/guardians of all patients before they were included in the study.

Results

Thirty P. falciparum samples were collected in a four-day mission with parasitaemia ranging from 0.01 to 0.72%. Among them, sequencing of the Pfdhfr gene revealed four different alleles: the 164L single mutant-type (N = 13), the wild-type (N = 7), the triple mutant-type 51I/59R/108N (N = 9) and the double mutant-type 108N/164L (N = 1). The latter allele was observed for the first time in this area.

Genotyping of collected isolates showed that 11/30 (36.7%) of P. falciparum isolates had a single allelic form and were considered as monoclonal infection: 164L single mutant-type allele (4/13), wild-type allele (2/7), triple mutant-type 51I/59R/108N allele (4/9) and double mutant-type allele 108N/164L (1/1). Among them, five isolates were successfully adapted in culture (1 isolate with wild-type allele, three isolates with 164L single mutant-type allele and one isolate with triple mutant-type 51I/59R/108N allele) and tested for PYR in vitro susceptibility. On these samples, Pfdhfr genotypes and MOI which were assessed after the culture adaptation period were identical to initial samples.

Pyrimethamine IC50s were significantly different among the three Pfdhfr alleles (P < 0.001). The wild-type allele was the most susceptible with an IC50 < 10 nM. The geometric mean of IC50 of the three I164L mutant isolates was significantly higher (6-fold, P < 0.001) than the wild-type with 61.3 nM (SD = 3.2 nM, CI95%: 53.9-69.7 nM). These values remained largely below the IC50 of the triple mutant parasite tested in the assay which was 13,804 nM.

Discussion & Conclusion

The main result of this study was that I164L mutant isolates did not show fully susceptible IC50s, but values that were significantly higher than those of the wild-type (six-fold higher). These values were nearer to what is usually reported for simple mutants S108N (roughly10-fold higher than wild type) [23]. Thus, the determination of IC50s directly on parasites did not confirm on that specific point what has been found by Lozowski et al using transgenic bacteria. The adaptation of isolates to culture conditions is a delicate process, which is not always successful. In the present study, three clonal infections by parasites harbouring the I164L mutations were adapted, which enabled us to observe the low SD of the IC50s to PYR between these strains. Given the observed values of IC50s, the presence of Pfdhfr I164L single mutant parasites did not challenge the current use of SP for IPTp in Madagascar. Indeed, I164L mutant isolates could not been considered as resistant because the usual threshold for PYR resistance was defined as > 2,000 nM, the intermediate values, 100-2000 nM, representing moderate resistance [24]. However, the emergence of highly resistant alleles should be considered as possible for two reasons: first, the prevalence of the I164L allele has increased since year 2006 (14 isolates out 30 (46.7%) in the present series) and second, the presence of the double mutant-type allele S108N/I164L has been detected in a monoclonal isolate. The latter means that the 108N/164L genotype has been formed either on a background of S108N or I164L. This pathway was not expected according to the model of Lozovsky et al, but obviously it occurred in the real life. As I164L simple mutant genotype is not found today in another area in the world, Malagasy parasites may have a particular background, which enabled the emergence of this double mutant genotype. A highly resistant IC50 (103 μg/ml) for the S108N/I164L genotype was found using transgenic bacteria [17]. Unfortunately, the S108N/I164L isolate was not successfully adapted to culture and it was consequently impossible to confirm this in vitro resistance level. Interestingly, these authors reported that the low fitness of the quadruple mutant in the absence of PYR was not observed in transgenic bacteria having the S108N/I164L genotype. If these characteristics were to apply to natural parasites, it could have implications in terms of transmission of these strains. The triple mutant-type 51I/59R/108N was also largely prevalent (9 out 30 (30%) isolates) in the area and may represent a possible background for the emergence of the quadruple mutant. In addition, the diffusion of the quadruple mutant from the Comoros Islands remains possible and could be a source of highly resistant parasites. Combinations of DHFR and DHPS inhibitors act synergistically. To further document the impact of the Pfdhfr I164L mutation in SP resistance it may be interesting to determine polymorphisms in Pfdhps gene, which was not done for isolates of the present series. A previous work performed in a large series in 2007 in Madagascar showed that 46% of isolates harboured the Pfdhps A437G mutation [14]. For all these reasons, epidemiological surveillance is needed in the future to monitor the use of SP in IPTp.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and healthcare workers involved in the national network for the surveillance of malaria resistance in Madagascar (Réseau d'Etude de la Résistance, RER) from which these samples were obtained, and the staff of the Ministry of Health of Madagascar for their collaboration. This study was supported by grants from the Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée (IMEA), Fondation Léon M'Ba, Paris, France; Université Paris 13, Département Relation Européenne et Internationale, Bobigny, France and the Genomics Platform, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. Samples collection in Madagascar was funded by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, round 3 (Community Action to Roll Back Malaria, grant no. MDG-304-G05-M). D. Ménard was supported by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs during this work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unité de Recherche sur le Paludisme, Institut Pasteur
(2)
Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Avicenne
(3)
Unité de Parasitologie UMR6236, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées
(4)
Plateforme Génomique, Institut Pasteur
(5)
Ministère de la Santé, du Planning Familial et de la Protection Sociale
(6)
Unité d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire, Institut Pasteur

References

  1. Hay SI, Guerra CA, Gething PW, Patil AP, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Kabaria CW, Manh BH, Elyazar IR, Brooker S, Smith DL, Moyeed RA, Snow RW: A world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2007. PLoS Med. 2009, 6: e1000048-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Newman RD, Parise ME, Slutsker L, Nahlen B, Steketee RW: Safety, efficacy and determinants of effectiveness of antimalarial drugs during pregnancy: implications for prevention programmes in Plasmodium falciparum-endemic sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2003, 8: 488-506. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01066.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aponte JJ, Schellenberg D, Egan A, Breckenridge A, Carneiro I, Critchley J, Danquah I, Dodoo A, Kobbe R, Lell B, May J, Premji Z, Sanz S, Sevene E, Soulaymani-Becheikh R, Winstanley P, Adjei S, Anemana S, Chandramohan D, Issifou S, Mockenhaupt F, Owusu-Agyei S, Greenwood B, Grobusch MP, Kremsner PG, Macete E, Mshinda H, Newman RD, Slutsker L, Tanner M, Alonso P, Menendez C: Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria in African infants: a pooled analysis of six randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 2009, 374: 1533-1542. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61258-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Basco LK, Eldin de Pecoulas P, Wilson CM, Le Bras J, Mazabraud A: Point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene and pyrimethamine and cycloguanil resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995, 69: 135-138. 10.1016/0166-6851(94)00207-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowman AF, Morry MJ, Biggs BA, Cross GA, Foote SJ: Amino acid changes linked to pyrimethamine resistance in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 9109-9113. 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nzila-Mounda A, Mberu EK, Sibley CH, Plowe CV, Winstanley PA, Watkins WM: Kenyan Plasmodium falciparum field isolates: correlation between pyrimethamine and chlorcycloguanil activity in vitro and point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase domain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 164-169.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Peterson DS, Walliker D, Wellems TE: Evidence that a point mutation in dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase confers resistance to pyrimethamine in falciparum malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 9114-9118. 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9114.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Plowe CV: The evolution of drug-resistant malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 103 (Suppl 1): S11-14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Snewin VA, England SM, Sims PF, Hyde JE: Characterisation of the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthetase gene from human malaria parasites highly resistant to pyrimethamine. Gene. 1989, 76: 41-52. 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90006-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregson A, Plowe CV: Mechanisms of resistance of malaria parasites to antifolates. Pharmacol Rev. 2005, 57: 117-145. 10.1124/pr.57.1.4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kiara SM, Okombo J, Masseno V, Mwai L, Ochola I, Borrmann S, Nzila A: In vitro activity of antifolate and polymorphism in dihydrofolate reductase of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from the Kenyan coast: emergence of parasites with Ile-164-Leu mutation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 3793-3798. 10.1128/AAC.00308-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Plowe CV, Kublin JG, Doumbo OK: P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase mutations: epidemiology and role in clinical resistance to antifolates. Drug Resist Updat. 1998, 1: 389-396. 10.1016/S1368-7646(98)80014-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynch C, Pearce R, Pota H, Cox J, Abeku TA, Rwakimari J, Naidoo I, Tibenderana J, Roper C: Emergence of a dhfr mutation conferring high-level drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum populations from southwest Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 1598-1604. 10.1086/587845.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Andriantsoanirina V, Ratsimbasoa A, Bouchier C, Jahevitra M, Rabearimanana S, Radrianjafy R, Andrianaranjaka V, Randriantsoa T, Rason MA, Tichit M, Rabarijaona LP, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Durand R, Ménard D: Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Madagascar: facing the spread of unusual pfdhfr and pfmdr-1 haplotypes and the decrease of dihydroartemisinin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 4588-4597. 10.1128/AAC.00610-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maiga O, Djimde AA, Hubert V, Renard E, Aubouy A, Kironde F, Nsimba B, Koram K, Doumbo OK, Le Bras J, Clain J: A shared Asian origin of the triple-mutant dhfr allele in Plasmodium falciparum from sites across Africa. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196: 165-172. 10.1086/518512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Menard D, Andriantsoanirina V, Jahevitra M, Barnadas C, Tichit M, Bouchier C, Hopkins Sibley C: Dihydrofolate reductase I164L mutation in Plasmodium falciparum, Madagascar. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14: 1166-1167. 10.3201/eid1407.071498.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lozovsky ER, Chookajorn T, Brown KM, Imwong M, Shaw PJ, Kamchonwongpaisan S, Neafsey DE, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL: Stepwise acquisition of pyrimethamine resistance in the malaria parasite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 12025-12030. 10.1073/pnas.0905922106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Menard D, Ratsimbasoa A, Randrianarivelojosia M, Rabarijaona LP, Raharimalala L, Domarle O, Randrianasolo L, Randriamanantena A, Jahevitra M, Andriantsoanirina V, Rason MA, Raherinjafy R, Rakotomalala E, Tuseo L, Raveloson A: Assessment of the efficacy of antimalarial drugs recommended by the National Malaria Control Programme in Madagascar: up-dated baseline data from randomized and multi-site clinical trials. Malar J. 2008, 7: 55-10.1186/1475-2875-7-55.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rakotonirina H, Barnadas C, Raherijafy R, Andrianantenaina H, Ratsimbasoa A, Randrianasolo L, Jahevitra M, Andriantsoanirina V, Menard D: Accuracy and reliability of malaria diagnostic techniques for guiding febrile outpatient treatment in malaria-endemic countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 78: 217-221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Monbrison F, Angei C, Staal A, Kaiser K, Picot S: Simultaneous identification of the four human Plasmodium species and quantification of Plasmodium DNA load in human blood by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97: 387-390. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90065-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Andriantsoanirina V, Bouchier C, Tichit M, Jahevitra M, Rabearimanana S, Randrianjafy R, Ratsimbasoa A, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Durand R, Menard D: Origins of the recent emergence of Plasmodium falciparum pyrimethamine resistance alleles in Madagascar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 54: 2323-2329.Google Scholar
  22. Desjardins RE, Canfield CJ, Haynes JD, Chulay JD: Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979, 16: 710-718.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hastings MD, Bates SJ, Blackstone EA, Monks SM, Mutabingwa TK, Sibley CH: Highly pyrimethamine-resistant alleles of dihydrofolate reductase in isolates of Plasmodium falciparum from Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 96: 674-676. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90349-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Basco LK, Ramiliarisoa O, Le Bras J: In vitro activity of pyrimethamine, cycloguanil, and other antimalarial drugs against African isolates and clones of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 50: 193-199.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Andriantsoanirina et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement