Open Access

Drug resistance associated genetic polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax collected in Honduras, Central America

  • Irina T Jovel1, 2Email author,
  • Rosa E Mejía3,
  • Engels Banegas3,
  • Rita Piedade4, 5,
  • Jackeline Alger6,
  • Gustavo Fontecha7,
  • Pedro E Ferreira8,
  • Maria I Veiga1,
  • Irma G Enamorado9,
  • Anders Bjorkman1 and
  • Johan Ursing1
Malaria Journal201110:376

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-376

Received: 27 October 2011

Accepted: 19 December 2011

Published: 19 December 2011

Abstract

Background

In Honduras, chloroquine and primaquine are recommended and still appear to be effective for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of resistance associated genetic polymorphisms in P. falciparum and P. vivax collected in Honduras.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from patients seeking medical attention at the Hospital Escuela in Tegucigalpa from 2004 to 2006 as well as three regional hospitals, two health centres and one regional laboratory during 2009. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (pfcrt), multidrug resistance 1 (pfmdr1), dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) genes and in P. vivax multidrug resistance 1 (pvmdr1) and dihydrofolate reductase (pvdhfr) genes were detected using PCR based methods.

Results

Thirty seven P. falciparum and 64 P. vivax samples were collected. All P. falciparum infections acquired in Honduras carried pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhps and pfdhfr alleles associated with chloroquine, amodiaquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine sensitivity only. One patient with parasites acquired on a Pacific Island had pfcrt 76 T and pfmdr1 86Y alleles. That patient and a patient infected in West Africa had pfdhfr 51I, 59 R and 108 N alleles. Pvmdr1 976 F was found in 7/37 and two copies of pvmdr1 were found in 1/37 samples. Pvdhfr 57 L + 58 R was observed in 2/57 samples.

Conclusion

The results indicate that P. falciparum from Honduras remain sensitive to chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. This suggests that chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine should be efficacious for treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, supporting current national treatment guidelines. However, genetic polymorphisms associated with chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine tolerance were detected in local P. vivax and imported P. falciparum infections. Continuous monitoring of the prevalence of drug resistant/tolerant P. falciparum and P. vivax is therefore essential also in Honduras.

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum Plasmodium vivax ChloroquineSulphadoxine-pyrimethamineSingle nucleotide polymorphisms and drug resistance

Background

In Honduras chloroquine is recommended for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infection. In addition primaquine is used for treatment of P. falciparum gametocytes and P. vivax hypnozoites [1, 2]. These drugs are believed to remain effective despite being used for six decades and despite the spread of chloroquine resistance across most of the rest of the world. However, there is lack of clinical trials as well as in vitro studies and the proportions of resistance associated genetic polymorphisms have not been determined in Honduras or other Mesoamerican countries [3].

There are several genetic polymorphisms described in P. falciparum and P. vivax that can provide reliable data about the prevalence of drug resistance. The most relevant polymorphisms are presented below. The 76 T allele in the chloroquine resistance transporter gene (pfcrt) is predictive of chloroquine and amodiaquine treatment failure [46]. The 86Y allele of the multidrug resistance gene 1 (pfmdr1) has been linked with chloroquine and amodiaquine resistance and increased chloroquine inhibitory concentrations in P. falciparum with pfcrt 76 T [7]. The pfcrt 76 K and pfmdr1 86 N alleles have been associated with lumefantrine tolerance and higher lumefantrine IC50 values [810]. Amplifications of pfmdr1 have been associated with mefloquine resistance, lumefantrine tolerance and reduced sensitivity to artesunate [1113]. The triple dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) haplotype N51I/C59R/S108N has been associated with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) treatment failure and when dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) SNPs G437A and K540E are added, highly resistant P. falciparum are generated [1418].

In P. vivax, the multidrug resistance gene 1 (pvmdr1) 976 F allele has been associated with reduced susceptibility to chloroquine and increased susceptibility to mefloquine and artesunate. However, amplifications of pvmdr1 have been associated with reduced susceptibility to mefloquine and artesunate [1820]. Twenty single nucleotide polymorphisms have been described in P. vivax dihydrofolate reductase (pvdhfr) including F57L, S58R, T61M and S117N/T that correspond to codons 50, 51, 59 and 108 in pfdhfr, respectively [2124]. Pvdhfr S58R and S117N result in decreased binding of pyrimethamine [25] and quadruple (F57L, S58R, S117N and I173L) resistance associated SNPs have been associated with SP treatment failure [2123].

The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of resistance associated genetic polymorphisms in P. falciparum and P. vivax field samples collected in Honduras.

Methods

Study setting, participants and ethics

In Honduras malaria transmission is seasonal and in 2010 there were 9,078 reported malaria cases. Plasmodium vivax mono-infection accounted for 88% and 12% were due to Plasmodium falciparum mono-infection and mixed P. vivax and P. falciparum infections. The country is divided into 20 health regions and there are 1,743 health facilities [2]. Samples were collected from patients that sought medical attention at the Hospital Escuela that is a teaching hospital in Distrito Central-Tegucigalpa, the regional hospitals in Trujillo, La Ceiba and Juticalpa, two primary health centres in Puerto Lempira and Iriona and one regional laboratory in Juticalpa. Samples were collected at Hospital Escuela between 2004 and 2006 and during 2009 at all other sites. The locations of all sites are shown in Figure 1. At the Hospital Escuela sample collection was considered to be part of routine malaria surveillance and did not involve additional sampling or collection of patient data. At the other health facilities patients who sought medical attention and were diagnosed with malaria were invited to participate in the study after written informed consent. The study was approved by the ethical review committee of Cardio Pulmonary National Institute in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. The molecular analyses were approved by the Stockholm regional ethics board (reference number 2011/832-32/2).
Figure 1

Distribution of malaria in the 128 municipalities in Honduras. Annual Parasite Incidence per 1,000 habitants. Samples were collected in (1) Distrito Central-Tegucigalpa, (2) Juticalpa, (3) Puerto Lempira, (4) Iriona, (5) Trujillo, (6) La Ceiba. The figure has been modified from [2] to provide more detail.

Sample collection and microscopy

As part of routine practice, 3 ml of blood were collected in EDTA tubes by venepuncture at the Hospital Escuela. Thick and thin smears were made and stained using Giemsa. Slides were viewed under X100 magnification. Trained laboratory technician examined at least 100 microscopy fields before considering a sample negative. When P. falciparum or P. vivax were identified approximately 100 μL of blood was collected on a filter paper (Schleicher & Schuell 903) that was dried, placed inside a small plastic bag and stored at room temperature. At the other health units the samples were generally collected in the same way but occasionally capillary samples were obtained by finger puncture. Microscopy was quality controlled at the National Malaria Laboratory were microscopists routinely re-examine all positive and approximately 10% of negative slides.

Sample storage, DNA extraction and amplification

DNA was extracted from the filter papers using an ABI Prism® 6100 Nucleic Acid Prep Station (Applied Biosystems, Fresno, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions with minor modifications [26]. Extracted DNA was stored at-20°C.

Previously described multiplex PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) methods were used to identify the following SNPs; pfcrt K76T, pfmdr1 N86Y, pfdhfr N51I, C59R, N108T/S and pfdhps G437A and K540E [27]. Pfcrt 72-76 haplotypes were identified by PCR amplification followed by sequencing [28]. Previously described nested PCRs were used to amplify codons 917-1118 of pvmdr1 and codons 1-238 of pvdhfr [19, 29]. Pvmdr1 and pvdhfr SNPs were then identified by sequencing. The Sequencher ™ software version 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI) was used for sequencing analysis. The P. falciparum 3D7 clone sequence obtained from NCBI database (pfcrt Gen-Bank Accession no. NC_004328) was used as reference for pfcrt. For pvdhfr the P. vivax ARI/Pakistan isolate sequence (Gen-Bank accession no. X98123) and for pvmdr1 the P. vivax Sal-1 isolate sequence (Gen-Bank accession no. AY618622) were used as references. PCR and restriction products were resolved on 2% agarose gels (Amresco, Solon, OH). All gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV transillumination (GelDoc®, Biorad, Hercules, Ca, USA). PCR products were purified and sequenced commercially (Macrogen Inc. Seoul, Korea).

Pfmdr1 and pvmdr1 copy numbers were determined using real time PCR (ABI Prism® 7000 Sequence Detection System) as previously described [12, 30]. All samples were run in triplicate. For pfmdr1 3D7, D10 and K1 clones were used as single copy calibrators and FCB and Dd2 were multiple copy controls. Pvmdr1 single and double copy calibrators were created by the insertion of pvmdr1 nucleotides 2751-3354 and pvbtubulin nucleotides 860-1056 in the pCR2.1 vector using the TOPO TA-cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 1:1 and 2:1 proportions, respectively. The sample copy numbers were calculated using a comparative threshold method (ΔΔCt). Copy number > 1.6 was defined as a duplication of the aforementioned genes. Assays were repeated if the following results were obtained: copy number 1.3-1.6 or Ct value > 35 or standard deviation value > 0.5.

Power calculation and statistical analyses

This was an exploratory study and a power calculation of sample size was therefore not done. Data were entered, validated and analysed on Microsoft Excel 2003. For both species allele proportions were calculated by dividing the number of samples with a certain allele by the number of samples with an identifiable allele at that position. Thus mixed infections contributed to the proportion of both alleles.

Results

Sample collection

At the Hospital Escuela blood samples were collected from 29 patients with Plasmodium falciparum mono-infection, 15 patients with Plasmodium vivax mono-infection and four patients with mixed infections. Two patients with P. falciparum mono-infection were assumed to have contracted their infections on a Pacific island and in West Africa based on their respective travel history. At the other laboratories and health centres samples were collected from four patients with P. falciparum and 45 patients with P. vivax mono-infections. Further details are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Origin of samples

Municipalities

P. falciparum

P. vivax

Mix inf

Distrito Central-

29

15

4

Tegucigalpa

   

Juticalpa

 

26

 

Puerto Lempira

2

3

 

Iriona

2

  

Trujillo

 

8

 

La Ceiba

 

8

 

*Two patients contracted malaria elsewhere: A tourist who was admitted one week after arriving in Honduras from the Pacific island region where he had been travelling. A pilot who was admitted the day he came to Honduras after working and visiting Equatorial Guinea, Ghana and Cameron during the previous three months.

Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum

Pfcrt K76T, pfmdr1 N86Y, pfmdr1 copy numbers, pfdhfr SNPs and pfdhps SNPs were successfully identified in 32/37 (91%) of samples. Allele proportions are presented in Table 2. All P. falciparum from Honduras (n = 30) had the pfcrt 72-76 CVMNK haplotype. The patient that became infected with P. falciparum in West Africa had the pfcrt 72-76 CVMNK haplotype and the patient infected on a Pacific island had the SVMNT haplotype. No other pfcrt SNPs were found in any of the sequenced fragments. Both imported cases had the pfmdr1 86Y allele and pfdhfr triple mutation 51I + 59 R + 108 N. One pfmdr1 copy was found in all samples.
Table 2

Single nucleotide polymorphisms and amplifications in pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr and pfdhps

Origin

pfcrt

pfmdr1

Copy Number

Pfdhfr

Pfdhps

Number (Proportion %)

76

86

51

59

108

437

540

Honduras

K

N

1

N

C

S

A

K

30 (94)§

Pacific

T

Y

1

I

R

N

A

K

1 (3)

Africa

K

Y

1

I

R

N

G/A

K

1 (3)

*Resistance associated alleles are shown in bold

§All infections were acquired in Honduras

Polymorphisms in Plasmodium vivax

PCR amplifications of pvmdr1 were successful in 64/64 samples. Following sequencing, codon 976 was identified in 41 samples and codon 1076 in 37 samples. Proportions of the alleles are shown in Table 3. The double mutation 976 F + 1076 L was observed in 4/37 (11%) samples. No other pvmdr1 SNPs were found in the sequenced fragments. Pvmdr1 gene copy numbers were successfully quantified in 61/64 samples. Two pvmdr1 gene copies were found in one sample and one sample repeatedly had an indeterminate 1.5 copies. These results were verified by performing the real time PCR 5 times for these samples. The pvmdr1 gene amplification was found in P. vivax that had the 976Y.
Table 3

Pvmdr1 Y976F and F1076L haplotype proportions

Haplotypes

Y976F

F1076L

Number

(Proportion %)

1

Y

F

29 (71)

2

Y

L

1 (2)

3

F

F

3 (7)

4

F

L

4 (10)

5

Y

ND

4 (10)

*Resistance associated alleles are shown in bold

ND: Not Determined

Pvdhfr was successfully amplified in 59/64 (92%) samples and sequencing was successful in 57 samples. Allele Proportions are presented in Table 4. The 57 L + 58 R double mutation was seen in 2/57 (3%) samples. Synonymous SNPs in codon 69 (TAT → TAC) were found in 13/57 (22%) samples. Two novel SNPs in codons 39 (CTG → TTG) and 85 (TCA → TCC) were observed in 2 (3%) and 3 (5%) samples, respectively. A repetition (ACA AGC GGT GGT GAC AAC) between amino acids 103 and 104 of pvdhfr was found in 5/57 (9%) of the samples.
Table 4

Pvdhfr F57L, S58R, T61M and S117N/T haplotype proportions

Alleles

F57L

S58R

T61M

S117N/T

Number

(Proportion %)

1

F

S

T

S

57 (97)

2

L

R

T

S

2 (3)

*Resistance associated alleles are shown in bold

Discussion

This is the first report on molecular markers of drug resistance from Honduras and indeed from Mesoamerica [3]. Finding no SNPs associated with CQ or SP resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Honduras indicates that P. falciparum of Honduran origin remain CQ and SP sensitive. The results are in line with the continued efficacy of CQ seen in previous in vitro (1980) and in vivo (1980 and 1998-2000) studies [31, 32]. This study thus indicates that the use of CQ in combination with primaquine for treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria and SP when CQ fails as recommended in the national treatment guidelines should be efficacious [1]. However, 2/2 patients with imported malaria had ≥ 3 SNPs associated with SP resistance suggesting that SP is not optimal for treating infections from regions outside Mesoamerica as is also recommended in the national treatment guidelines.

The results indicate that pfcrt 76 K, pfmdr1 86 N and SNPs in pfdhfr and pfdhps associated with SP sensitivity are fixed in Honduras. This suggests that P. falciparum in Honduras are less susceptible to lumefantrine and possibly mefloquine compared to areas where the dominant SNPs are pfcrt 76 T and pfmdr1 86Y [810, 33]. Should Honduras wish to introduce an artemisinin-based treatment, combinations containing amodiaquine or SP might, from the point of view of drug sensitivity, be preferred over combinations containing lumefantrine or mefloquine.

The high proportion of patients with P. falciparum compared to Plasmodium vivax infection at the Hospital Escuela was most probably due patients with P. falciparum being referred there. The two patients with imported malaria had according to their history of travel contracted P. falciparum on a Pacific island and in West Africa. Finding the pfcrt 72-76 SVMNT and CVMNK haplotypes is consistent with their respective travel histories suggesting that the resistance associated SNPs found were truly imported [34, 35]. These two patients highlight the risk of importing drug resistant malaria to Honduras. Considering this it is worth noting that malaria is often diagnosed clinically in Honduras and that it is then treated presumptively with primaquine (0,25 mg/kg) for 5 days in addition to CQ. Primaquine reduces the gametocytes carriage time thus reducing transmission and it is certainly possible that this has contributed to stop resistant P. falciparum from becoming established [36, 37].

CQ resistant P. vivax has been reported from several Asian and South American countries including Brazil, but not French Guiana [38]. In Southeast Asia the pvmdr1 976 F allele has been associated with reduced susceptibility to CQ [19] and in Brazil it was found in 100% of samples (n = 28) whilst it was not found in French Guiana (n = 5) [39, 40]. Finding the pvmdr1 976 F allele in 7/41 (17%) P. vivax might thus indicate a degree of CQ tolerance but probably not resistance in Honduras [18, 19, 41]. In line with this, an in vivo evaluation conducted in Honduras between 1998 and 2000 found that 73/73 P. vivax infections were successfully treated with CQ and primaquine [32]. Finding two copies of pvmdr1 in 1/61 samples should be interpreted with caution as neither mefloquine nor artesunate are commonly used in Honduras [20]. It may however suggest the natural occurrence of this genetic change in Honduras. The prevalence of pvmdr1 1076 L varies considerably across the world and although an association with CQ resistance has been proposed none has yet been found [18, 19, 3942]. The proportion in Honduras (4/37) is similar to that found in Brazil (4/28). In the pvmdr1 fragment amplified for this study one synonymous and nine non-synonymous SNPs have been reported worldwide. Five of these SNPs have been reported from South America in studies including nine patients whereas only one was found in this study [43, 44].

Double (57 L + 117 N), triple (57 L + 58R + 117 N) and quadruple (57 L + 58R + 61 M + 117 T) pvdhfr mutations have been associated with SP resistant P. vivax [21, 24, 34]. In this study 2/57 samples had the double 57 L + 58 R SNPs that have previously been described in similar proportions in Asia but not in South America [21, 24, 29, 4548]. These SNPs may suggest a degree of tolerance but probably not resistance to SP. It is thus probable that SP should be efficacious for the treatment of P. vivax in Honduras [49]. However, the efficacy of SP for the treatment of P. vivax has not been assessed in Mesoamerica [3]. Furthermore, finding the double mutation despite a probably low consumption of SP suggests that resistance might develop rapidly if SP usage increases. A possible explanation for the occurrence of 57 L and 58 R despite the low use of SP for malaria might be that trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is the first line drug for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in Honduras [50]. Two novel synonymous SNPs at codons 39 and 85, a previously described synonymous SNP at codon 69 and an insertion, were also found in pvdhfr. The proportion of SNP 69 (13/57) found in this study was considerably lower than that (77/90) reported from French Guiana [44].

Conclusion

Only SNPs linked to CQ or SP sensitivity were found in Plasmodium falciparum originating in Honduras indicating that CQ and SP should remain efficacious. Genetic polymorphisms associated with CQ and SP tolerance were found in eight (13%) and two (3%) Plasmodium vivax samples, respectively, suggesting a degree of tolerance. CQ and SP resistance associated SNPs were found in patients that contracted P. falciparum overseas highlighting the risk of importing drug resistance to Honduras. Continuous monitoring of the prevalence of drug resistant/tolerant P. falciparum and P. vivax in Honduras is, therefore, essential.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Department for research Cooperation (Sida-SAREC Contribution no 75007082/03). We wish to thank Laboratory Technician Wendy Lopez and Microbiologist Cinthya Bonilla for their work with sample collection at the Hospital Escuela.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Malaria Research Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital/Karolinska Institutet
(2)
Departamento de Parasitología, Escuela de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras (UNAH)
(3)
Laboratorio Nacional de Malaria, Departamento de Laboratorios, Secretaría de Salud
(4)
Unit of Drug Resistance, Division of Pharmacogenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute
(5)
Institute of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, University of Algarve
(6)
Servicio Parasitología, Departamento de Laboratorios Clínicos, Hospital Escuela; Unidad de Investigación Científica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras
(7)
Maestría de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Zoonóticas (MEIZ), Escuela de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras (UNAH)
(8)
Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Institutet
(9)
Departamento de Bioanálisis e Inmunología, Escuela de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras (UNAH)

References

  1. National Malaria Programme: Malaria Guidelines in Honduras. 2010, Tegucigalpa: Honduras Ministry of Health, FirstGoogle Scholar
  2. National Malaria Programme: Malaria Situation in Honduras 2010. 2011, Tegucigalpa: Ministry of HealthGoogle Scholar
  3. WHO: Global Report on antimalarial drug efficacy and drug resistance: 2000-2010. Geneva. 2010Google Scholar
  4. Djimde A, Doumbo OK, Cortese JF, Kayentao K, Doumbo S, Diourte Y, Dicko A, Su XZ, Nomura T, Fidock DA, Wellems TE, Plowe CV, Coulibaly D: A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. NEJM. 2001, 344: 257-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ursing J, Kofoed PE, Rodrigues A, Rombo L, Gil JP: Plasmodium falciparum genotypes associated with chloroquine and amodiaquine resistance in Guinea-Bissau. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 844-848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Picot S, Olliaro P, de Monbrison F, Bienvenu AL, Price RN, Ringwald P: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for correlation between molecular markers of parasite resistance and treatment outcome in falciparum malaria. Malar J. 2009, 8: 89-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Babiker HA, Pringle SJ, Abdel-Muhsin A, Mackinnon M, Hunt P, Walliker D: High-level chloroquine resistance in Sudanese isolates of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with mutations in the chloroquine resistance transporter gene pfcrt and the multidrug resistance Gene pfmdr1. J Infect Dis. 2001, 183: 1535-1538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sisowath C, Stromberg J, Martensson A, Msellem M, Obondo C, Bjorkman A, Gil JP: In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem). J Infect Dis. 2005, 191: 1014-1017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sisowath C, Ferreira PE, Bustamante LY, Dahlstrom S, Martensson A, Bjorkman A, Krishna S, Gil JP: The role of pfmdr1 in Plasmodium falciparum tolerance to artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 736-742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mwai L, Kiara SM, Abdirahman A, Pole L, Rippert A, Diriye A, Bull P, Marsh K, Borrmann S, Nzila A: In vitro activities of piperaquine, lumefantrine, and dihydroartemisinin in Kenyan Plasmodium falciparum isolates and polymorphisms in pfcrt and pfmdr1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 5069-5073.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Price RN, Cassar C, Brockman A, Duraisingh M, van Vugt M, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: The pfmdr1 gene is associated with a multidrug-resistant phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum from the western border of Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 2943-2949.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, Patel R, Laing K, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004, 364: 438-447.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, van Vugt M, Brockman A, Hutagalung R, Nair S, Nash D, Singhasivanon P, Anderson TJ, Krishna S, White NJ, Nosten F: Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 42: 1570-1577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Basco LK, Ringwald P: Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Yaounde, Cameroon. VI. Sequence variations in the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene and in vitro resistance to pyrimethamine and cycloguanil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 62: 271-276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyde JE: Drug-resistant malaria - an insight. FEBS J. 2007, 274: 4688-4698.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kublin JG, Dzinjalamala FK, Kamwendo DD, Malkin EM, Cortese JF, Martino LM, Mukadam RA, Rogerson SJ, Lescano AG, Molyneux ME, Winstanley PA, Chimpeni P, Taylor TE, Plowe CV: Molecular markers for failure of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chlorproguanil-dapsone treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis. 2002, 185: 380-388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynch C, Pearce R, Pota H, Cox J, Abeku TA, Rwakimari J, Naidoo I, Tibenderana J, Roper C: Emergence of a dhfr mutation conferring high-level drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum populations from southwest Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 1598-1604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Pongtavornpinyo W, Nakeesathit S, Nair S, Newton P, Nosten F, Anderson TJ, Dondorp A, Day NP, White NJ: Gene amplification of the multidrug resistance 1 gene of Plasmodium vivax isolates from Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 2657-2659.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Suwanarusk R, Russell B, Chavchich M, Chalfein F, Kenangalem E, Kosaisavee V, Prasetyorini B, Piera KA, Barends M, Brockman A, Lek-Uthai U, Anstey NM, Tjitra E, Nosten F, Cheng Q, Price RN: Chloroquine resistant Plasmodium vivax: in vitro characterisation and association with molecular polymorphisms. PLoS One. 2007, 2: e1089-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Suwanarusk R, Chavchich M, Russell B, Jaidee A, Chalfein F, Barends M, Prasetyorini B, Kenangalem E, Piera KA, Lek-Uthai U, Anstey NM, Tjitra E, Nosten F, Cheng Q, Price RN: Amplification of pvmdr1 associated with multidrug-resistant Plasmodium vivax. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 1558-1564.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tjitra E, Baker J, Suprianto S, Cheng Q, Anstey NM: Therapeutic efficacies of artesunate-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chloroquine-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in vivax malaria pilot studies: relationship to Plasmodium vivax dhfr mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 3947-3953.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Imwong M, Pukrittakayamee S, Looareesuwan S, Pasvol G, Poirreiz J, White NJ, Snounou G: Association of genetic mutations in Plasmodium vivax dhfr with resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: geographical and clinical correlates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001, 45: 3122-3127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hastings MD, Porter KM, Maguire JD, Susanti I, Kania W, Bangs MJ, Sibley CH, Baird JK: Dihydrofolate reductase mutations in Plasmodium vivax from Indonesia and therapeutic response to sulfadoxine plus pyrimethamine. J Infect Dis. 2004, 189: 744-750.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Auliff A, Wilson DW, Russell B, Gao Q, Chen N, Anh le N, Maguire J, Bell D, O'Neil MT, Cheng Q: Amino acid mutations in Plasmodium vivax DHFR and DHPS from several geographical regions and susceptibility to antifolate drugs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 617-621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kongsaeree P, Khongsuk P, Leartsakulpanich U, Chitnumsub P, Tarnchompoo B, Walkinshaw MD, Yuthavong Y: Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium vivax: pyrimethamine displacement linked with mutation-induced resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 13046-13051.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dahlstrom S, Veiga MI, Ferreira P, Martensson A, Kaneko A, Andersson B, Bjorkman A, Gil JP: Diversity of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase orthologue of Plasmodium falciparum (PfATP6). Infect Genet Evol. 2008, 8: 340-345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Veiga MI, Ferreira PE, Bjorkman A, Gil JP: Multiplex PCR-RFLP methods for pfcrt, pfmdr1 and pfdhfr mutations in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Cell Probes. 2006, 20: 100-104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Echeverry DF, Holmgren G, Murillo C, Higuita JC, Bjorkman A, Gil JP, Osorio L: Short report: polymorphisms in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes of Plasmodium falciparum and in vitro susceptibility to amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 1034-1038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawkins VN, Auliff A, Prajapati SK, Rungsihirunrat K, Hapuarachchi HC, Maestre A, O'Neil MT, Cheng Q, Joshi H, Na-Bangchang K, Sibley CH: Multiple origins of resistance-conferring mutations in Plasmodium vivax dihydrofolate reductase. Malar J. 2008, 7: 72-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu F, Lim CS, Nam DH, Kim K, Lin K, Kim TS, Lee HW, Chen JH, Wang Y, Sattabongkot J, Han ET: Genetic polymorphism in pvmdr1 and pvcrt-o genes in relation to in vitro drug susceptibility of Plasmodium vivax isolates from malaria-endemic countries. Acta Trop. 2011, 117: 69-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nguyen-Dinh P, Hobbs JH, Campbell CC: Assessment of chloroquine sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum in Choluteca, Honduras. Bull World Health Organ. 1981, 59: 641-646.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mejía-Díaz JR, Alger J, Valenzuela-Castillo R, Jeremías-Soto R: Evaluate the clinical and parasitological efficacy of chloroquine in the treatment of malaria in children. Hospital Escuela 1998-2000, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Revista Medica de los Postgrados de Medicina. 2000, 5: 97-104.Google Scholar
  33. Duraisingh MT, Jones P, Sambou I, von Seidlein L, Pinder M, Warhurst DC: The tyrosine-86 allele of the pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with increased sensitivity to the anti-malarials mefloquine and artemisinin. Mol Biochem Parasit. 2000, 108: 13-23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Mita T: Origins and spread of pfdhfr mutant alleles in Plasmodium falciparum. Acta Trop. 2010, 114: 166-170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mita T, Tanabe K, Kita K: Spread and evolution of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance. Parasitol Int. 2009, 58: 201-209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Barnes KI, White NJ: Population biology and antimalarial resistance: The transmission of antimalarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Acta Trop. 2005, 94: 230-240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawpoolsri S, Klein EY, Singhasivanon P, Yimsamran S, Thanyavanich N, Maneeboonyang W, Hungerford LL, Maguire JH, Smith DL: Optimally timing primaquine treatment to reduce Plasmodium falciparum transmission in low endemicity Thai-Myanmar border populations. Malar J. 2009, 8: 159-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Baird JK: Resistance to therapies for infection by Plasmodium vivax. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009, 22: 508-534.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Orjuela-Sanchez P, da Silva NS, da Silva-Nunes M, Ferreira MU: Recurrent parasitemias and population dynamics of Plasmodium vivax polymorphisms in rural Amazonia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 961-968.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Barnadas C, Tichit M, Bouchier C, Ratsimbasoa A, Randrianasolo L, Raherinjafy R, Jahevitra M, Picot S, Menard D: Plasmodium vivax dhfr and dhps mutations in isolates from Madagascar and therapeutic response to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. Malar J. 2008, 7: 35-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Miao M, Yang Z, Cui L, Ahlum J, Huang Y: Different allele prevalence in the dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase genes in Plasmodium vivax populations from China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 83: 1206-1211.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gama BE, Oliveira NK, Souza JM, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Ferreira-da-Cruz Mde F: Characterisation of pvmdr1 and pvdhfr genes associated with chemoresistance in Brazilian Plasmodium vivax isolates. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 1009-1011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Orjuela-Sanchez P, de Santana Filho FS, Machado-Lima A, Chehuan YF, Costa MR, Alecrim MG, del Portillo HA: Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the crt-o and mdr1 genes of Plasmodium vivax among chloroquine-resistant isolates from the Brazilian Amazon region. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 3561-3564.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Barnadas C, Musset L, Legrand E, Tichit M, Briolant S, Fusai T, Rogier C, Bouchier C, Picot S, Menard D: High prevalence and fixation of Plasmodium vivax dhfr/dhps mutations related to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine resistance in French Guiana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 19-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Renia L, Letourneur F, Charlieu JP, Leartsakulpanich U, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Snounou G: Novel point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of Plasmodium vivax: evidence for sequential selection by drug pressure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 1514-1521.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaur S, Prajapati SK, Kalyanaraman K, Mohmmed A, Joshi H, Chauhan VS: Plasmodium vivax dihydrofolate reductase point mutations from the Indian subcontinent. Acta Trop. 2006, 97: 174-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zakeri S, Afsharpad M, Ghasemi F, Raeisi A, Kakar Q, Atta H, Djadid ND: Plasmodium vivax: prevalence of mutations associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in Plasmodium vivax clinical isolates from Pakistan. Exp Parasitol. 2011, 127: 167-172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zakeri S, Motmaen SR, Afsharpad M, Djadid ND: Molecular characterization of antifolates resistance-associated genes, (dhfr and dhps) in Plasmodium vivax isolates from the Middle East. Malar J. 2009, 8: 20-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hawkins VN, Joshi H, Rungsihirunrat K, Na-Bangchang K, Sibley CH: Antifolates can have a role in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax. Trends Parasitol. 2007, 23: 213-222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Strengthening Pharmaceutical Program: Situation of management of medicines supply for treatment of malaria in Central America countries. Presented to United States Agency for International Development by the SPS Program. 2008, Health MSf ed. Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jovel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement