Open Access

Early treatment failure during treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria with atovaquone-proguanil in the Republic of Ivory Coast

  • Nathalie Wurtz1, 2Email author,
  • Aurélie Pascual1, 2,
  • Adeline Marin-Jauffre1,
  • Housem Bouchiba1,
  • Nicolas Benoit2, 3,
  • Marc Desbordes2, 3,
  • Maryse Martelloni2, 3,
  • Vincent Pommier de Santi4,
  • Georges Richa5,
  • Nicolas Taudon2, 3,
  • Bruno Pradines1, 2 and
  • Sébastien Briolant1
Malaria Journal201211:146

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-146

Received: 2 March 2012

Accepted: 2 May 2012

Published: 2 May 2012

Abstract

The increased spread of drug-resistant malaria highlights the need for alternative drugs for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. The combination of atovaquone‐proguanil (Malarone®) has shown high efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum with only mild side-effects. Treatment failures have been attributed to suboptimal dosages or to parasite resistance resulting from a point mutation in the cytochrome b gene. In this paper, a case of early treatment failure was reported in a patient treated with atovaquone-proguanil; this failure was not associated with a mutation in the parasite cytochrome b gene, with impaired drug bioavailability, or with re-infection.

Keywords

Malaria Plasmodium falciparum Malarone® Atovaquone-proguanil Cytochrome b Resistance Clinical failure in vitro Anti-malarial drug

Background

Increasing reports of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum throughout the world have forced changes in both prevention and treatment. Atovaquone-proguanil (A-P, Malarone®, GlaxoSmithKline Inc) is one of the common first-line agent for the prophylaxis [13] and treatment [2, 4, 5] of falciparum malaria in France and causes only mild side-effects. Since the introduction of the A-P combination, several cases of treatment failure have been observed in travellers returning from Africa [614]. Treatment failures have been attributed to suboptimal dosage or impaired bioavailability, re-infection or to a point mutation in the cytochrome b gene (pfcytb) [4, 9, 15]. In this paper, a case of A-P treatment failure in a military employee stationed in the Republic of Ivory Coast was reported; this treatment failure was not due to low plasma levels of the drug, mutations in the pfcytb gene, or re-infection.

Case presentation

The patient was a 45-year-old military employee deployed to Abidjan in the Republic of Ivory Coast (Port Bouet camp). He had been stationed in Abidjan for six months and had repeatedly forgotten to take the prescribed anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis drug, doxycycline. He presented general malaise and headaches on 27 September, 2011, and was treated by self-medication with paracetamol. Two days later (29 September, 2011 (day 0)), the patient consulted the medical centre of the camp, where he presented headache, myalgias, chills and fever with a temperature of 39.7°C. A blood smear examination revealed P. falciparum at a parasitaemia of 0.74%, and a rapid diagnosis test confirmed Plasmodium infection. The patient was hospitalized and immediately treated with the standard treatment of Malarone®, four 250 mg tablets daily on day 0, day 1 and day 2, associated with paracetamol and the continuation of chemoprophylaxis with doxycycline. The tablets were taken with fatty food and were well tolerated. No vomiting or diarrhoea occurred during hospitalization. At day 1, the patient was asymptomatic and afebrile. At day 2, after the last intake of Malarone®, the patient experienced a febrile peak at 38.5°C and blood smear examination revealed a parasitaemia of 1.3%. Because of the recrudescent parasitaemia and according to WHO guidelines for the assessment and monitoring of anti-malarial drug efficacy for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria [16], the possibility of early A-P treatment failure was considered, and the patient was treated with 625 mg of quinine base (Quinimax®) orally three times daily for seven days, doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for seven days) and paracetamol. On 4 October (day 5), the parasitaemia decreased to 0.02%, and on 7 October (day 8), a QBC test was negative.

Methods

Whole blood specimens from the first (day 0) and second (day 2) episodes of malaria were submitted to the reference laboratory for gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing, genetic analysis and quantification of the plasma concentrations of drugs. No in vitro assays of the P. falciparum isolates could be performed. The DNA of both samples was extracted from blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Qiagen, France). Confirmation of P. falciparum mono-infection was performed by real-time LightCycler® PCR (Roche, Meylan, France), as described elsewhere [17]. The pfcytb and dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) genes were amplified by PCR and sequenced for both isolates to detect mutations associated with resistance to A-P, respectively, as described [15, 18, 19]. Molecular markers of resistance [19], such as pfcrt (chloroquine resistance transporter), pfmdr1 (multidrug resistance 1 protein), pfnhe1 (Na+/H+ exporter 1), pfdhps (dihydropteroate synthetase), pftetQ (tetQ family GTPase) and pfmdt (metabolite/drug transporter) were also assessed. The single-nucleotide polymorphism and copy number assays for these different genes were performed as previously described [15, 2022]. The parasite diversity between day 0 and day 2 was determined by genotyping the TRAP, 7A11, C4M79, Pf2802, and Pf2689 microsatellite loci; the highly polymorphic loci of the merozoite surface protein 1 and 2 antigen genes (msp1 msp2); and the highly polymorphic loci of the glutamate-rich protein gene (glurp) using fluorescent end-labelled nested PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The primer sequences, PCR conditions, and genotyping methods have been described elsewhere [2325]. The drug absorption and compliance were estimated by quantification of the drug levels in the patient’s plasma; these assays were performed using a Waters Acquity UPLC instrument (Milford, MA, USA). Separation was carried out on an Acquity BEH C8 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) maintained at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.5% acetic acid in purified water) and solvent B (acetonitrile). Two gradient programmes were used, one for the quantification of proguanil, cycloguanil and doxycycline and the second for the quantification of atovaquone. The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. The injection volume and total run time were, respectively, 5 μL and 3 min. A purification step was performed before analysis using i) an OASIS® HLB SPE cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) for proguanil, cycloguanil and doxycycline and ii) protein precipitation by the addition of two volumes of an ACN/H2O/acetic acid solution (85:14:1, v/v/v).

Consent

Informed consent was not required because the sampling procedures and testing are part of the French national recommendations for the care and surveillance of malaria.

Results

As previously observed on the blood smear, P. falciparum is the only species detected by real-time PCR. The whole sequencing of the pfcytb gene, which encodes the target of atovaquone, revealed a wild-type P. falciparum isolate on day 0 and day 2 (M133, Y268). Moreover, no other point mutation was identified in the pfcytb gene. Genotyping of the whole pfdhfr gene showed that the three of the five major mutations (A16, N51I, C59R, S108N, I164) associated with proguanil (cycloguanil)/ pyrimethamine resistance were found in isolates from day 0 and day 2. Genotyping of the pfcrt gene (wild type, K76), the pfmdr1 gene (N86, Y184F, S1034, N1042 and D1246) and the pfdhps gene (S436A, A437G, K540, A581, and A613) showed identical alleles. Only one copy each of pfmdr1, pftetQ and pfmdt was found in each sample. The pfnhe1 microsatellite ms4760 exhibited profile 22 with one DNNND repeat and two DDDNHNDNHNN repeats. Genotyping of the parasites from days 0 and 2 using the microsatellite loci, msp1, msp2, and glurp showed that the alleles were identical for each locus in the two samples.

Ultra high-performance liquid chromatography was performed on a blood sample withdrawn just before the third Malarone® administration. Thus, the results showed the residual levels of drugs just before the last intake. The atovaquone plasma concentration was 5.1 μg/mL, and the proguanil and doxycycline levels were, respectively, equal to 380 ng/mL and 509 ng/mL. The plasma concentration of cycloguanil was not determined due to the presence of an interfering signal.

Conclusion

Malarone®, a fixed-dose combination of A-P, is highly effective for the treatment and prophylaxis of multi-drug-resistant falciparum malaria [15], and it is a useful agent due to its convenient mode of administration (oral), short treatment course (three days) and limited side effects. Atovaquone, a ubiquinone analogue that binds to CYTB of plasmodial mitochondria, exerts its action by inhibiting electron transfer in the respiratory chain [26, 27]. The proguanil metabolite cycloguanil acts by inhibiting the parasite PfDHFR protein, which is involved in pyrimidine biosynthesis, and the addition of proguanil leads to an enhancement of atovaquone’s activity and reduces the chance of mutations arising in the mitochondrial DNA of the malaria parasite [28, 29]. Since the introduction of the A-P combination, few cases of treatment failure have been identified in travellers returning from Africa [614]. Treatment failures have been generally attributed to suboptimal dosage, re-infections with a new parasite, or to a point mutation (Y268N, Y268S or Y268C) in the pfcytb gene [4, 9, 14, 18]. However, several cases of clinical treatment failure were not associated with any known pfcytb mutation, the plasma drug concentrations were well within curative range, and re-infection was excluded [7, 8, 13]. In this paper, a case of early A-P treatment failure not associated with pfcytb mutations in a military employee stationed in Abidjan in the Republic of Ivory Coast was reported.

The residual drug levels were quantified on a sample withdrawn between 23 to 24 hours after the second Malarone® intake. No recommended therapeutic concentrations are available for the A-P. Association and data are missing especially in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum imported malaria in Caucasians. However, regarding pharmacokinetics parameters of the both drugs, and more particularly the elimination half-life, the maximum concentrations and steady-state concentrations, impaired bioavailability can be excluded [3033]. Data about the relationship between plasma doxycycline concentration and time in the same population are also lacking. However, drug plasmatic level is in the same other as that expected [34, 35].

For further analysis, the day 0 and day 2 P. falciparum isolates were investigated for point mutations in the pfcytb codon 268 [15], and this analysis revealed wild-type alleles in both isolates. Genotyping of the blood samples from day 0 and day 2 at microsatellite loci (TRAP, 7A11, C4M79, Pf2802, and Pf2689) and at the highly polymorphic loci of the msp1 and msp2 antigen genes and of the glurp gene were performed. The results showed that the two samples had the same molecular signature and complete homology, excluding the possibility of a re-infection, and these results were confirmed by genotypic analysis of resistance markers. Based on these results, the clinical and parasitological features of the patient between day 0 and day 2, and the WHO definition of treatment failure [16, 36], this case could be classified as an early treatment failure.

Several other factors may also contribute to the emergence of A-P resistance, including hyperparasitaemia, rapid metabolism of proguanil or prior exposure to related drugs [37]. In this case, high parasitaemia was not observed (parasitaemia on day 0 = 0.74%; parasitaemia on day 2 = 1.3%). Caucasians are known to metabolize proguanil to cycloguanil relatively rapidly compared to other ethnic groups, leaving the parasites exposed to atovaquone alone for a longer period of time [31]. However, there was no clear evidence to implicate this mechanism as a factor in the emergence of A-P resistance in this case. Moreover, the metabolic status (i.e. poor/extensive) of the patient can’t be assumed with this only concentration versus time level. In the context of this case report, the genotype or an individual pharmacokinetics for proguanil was not possible.

In summary, this case represents the first observation of the clinical failure of A-P treatment for P. falciparum infection in a military in Ivory Coast that was not due to impaired drug bioavailability, resistance due to pfcytb mutations or re-infection with a new parasite. The absence of mutations in pfcytb suggests that alternative mechanisms may be involved in the resistance to this drug combination [7, 8]. Indeed, resistance may be associated with either inhibition or alteration of key enzymes that are targets for anti-malarial drugs, or alteration of drug accumulation in the parasite that results from reduced uptake of the drug, increased efflux, or a combination of both processes [19].

Although clinical failure of A-P treatment is rare among travellers, increased vigilance is required during treatment and post-treatment, and the monitoring of the parasite population should be strengthened. Further research is required to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the clinical failure observed after treatment with Malarone®, one of the few available drugs used to treat infections with multidrug-resistant P. falciparum parasites.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support of the Délégation Générale pour l’Armement and the Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées (grant no. 10Ca405).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unité de Parasitologie - Unité de Recherche pour les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes - UMR 6236, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées
(2)
Centre National de Référence du Paludisme
(3)
UMR MD3 Infections Parasitaires: Transmission, Physiopathologie et Thérapeutique, Aix-Marseille Université, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées
(4)
Centre d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique des Armées
(5)
Centre médical des armées de Nîmes Orange Laudun, antenne colonel De Chabrières

References

  1. Boggild AK, Parise ME, Lewis LS, Kain KC: Atovaquone-proguanil: report from the CDC expert meeting on malaria chemoprophylaxis (II). AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 208-223.Google Scholar
  2. Patel SN, Kain KC: Atovaquone-proguanil for the prophylaxis and treatment of malaria. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2005, 3: 849-861. 10.1586/14787210.3.6.849.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nakato H, Vivancos R, Hunter PR: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone) for chemoprophylaxis against malaria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007, 60: 929-936. 10.1093/jac/dkm337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Looareesuwan S, Chulay JD, Canfield CJ, Hutchinson DB: Malarone (atovaquone‐proguanil hydrochloride): a review of its clinical development for treatment of malaria. Malarone Clinical Trials Study Group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 60: 533-541.Google Scholar
  5. Osei-Akoto A, Orton L, Owusu-Ofori SP: Atovaquone-proguanil for treating uncomplicated malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005, 2005-CD004529.Google Scholar
  6. Contentin L, Grammatico-Guillon L, Desoubeaux G, Baron S, Thanh HD: Atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure in Plasmodium falciparum. Presse Med. 2011, 40: 1081-1083. 10.1016/j.lpm.2011.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Durand R, Prendki V, Cailhol J, Hubert V, Ralaimazava P, Massias L, Bouchaud O, Le Bras J: Plasmodium falciparum malaria and atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14: 320-322. 10.3201/eid1402.070945.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Farnert A, Lindberg J, Gil P, Swedberg G, Berqvist Y, Thapar MM, Lindegardh N, Berezcky S, Bjorkman A: Evidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria resistant to atovaquone‐proguanil hydrochloride: case reports. BMJ. 2003, 326: 628-629. 10.1136/bmj.326.7390.628.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fivelman QL, Butcher GA, Adagu IS, Warhurst DC, Pasvol G: Malarone treatment failure and in vitro confirmation of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum isolate from Lagos. Nigeria. Malar J. 2002, 1: 1-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn S, Gill MJ, Kain KC: Emergence of atovaquone-proguanil resistance during treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria acquired by a non-immune north American traveller to west Africa. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2005, 72: 407-409.Google Scholar
  11. Rose GW, Suh KN, Kain KC, Le Saux N, McCarthy AE: Atovaquone-proguanil resistance in imported falciparum malaria in a young child. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008, 27: 567-569. 10.1097/INF.0b013e318167918d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwartz E, Bujanover S, Kain KC: Genetic confirmation of atovaquone-proguanil-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria acquired by a nonimmune traveler to East Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37: 450-451. 10.1086/375599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wichmann O, Muehlen M, Gruss H, Mockenhaupt FP, Suttorp N, Jelinek T: Malarone treatment failure not associated with previously described mutations in the cytochrome b gene. Malar J. 2004, 3: 14-10.1186/1475-2875-3-14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Savini H, Souraud JB, Briolant S, Baret E, Amalvict R, Rogier C, Pradines B: Atorvastatin as a potential antimalarial drug: in vitro synergy in combinational therapy with dihydroartemisinin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 54: 966-967.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Parola P, Pradines B, Simon F, Carlotti MP, Minodier P, Ranjeva MP, Badiaga S, Bertaux L, Delmont J, Morillon M, Silai R, Brouqui P, Parzy D: Antimalarial drug susceptibility and point mutations associated with drug resistance in 248 Plasmodium falciparum isolates imported from Comoros to Marseille, France in 2004 2006. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 431-437.Google Scholar
  16. WHO: Evaluation et surveillance de l’efficacité des antipaludiques pour le traitement du paludisme à Plasmodium falciparum non compliqué. 2004, World Health Organization, Geneva, Report No. : WHO/HTM/RBM/2003.50Google Scholar
  17. Wurtz N, Mint Lekweiry K, Bogreau H, Pradines B, Rogier C, Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary A, Hafid JE, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Trape JF, Basco LK, Briolant S: Vivax malaria in Mauritania includes infection of a Duffy-negative individual. Malar J. 2011, 10: 336-10.1186/1475-2875-10-336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Musset L, Bouchaud O, Matheron S, Massias L, Le Bras J: Clinical atovaquone-proguanil resistance of Plasmodium falciparum associated with cytochrome b codon 268 mutations. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8: 2599-2604. 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.07.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pradines B, Dormoire J, Briolant S, Bogreau H, Rogier C: La résistance aux antipaludiques. Rev Fr Lab. 2010, 422: 51-62.Google Scholar
  20. Briolant S, Wurtz N, Zettor A, Rogier C, Pradines B: Susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum isolates to doxycycline is associated with pftetQ sequence polymorphisms and pftetQ and pfmdt copy numbers. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201: 153-159. 10.1086/648594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Henry M, Briolant S, Zettor A, Pelleau S, Baragatti M, Baret E, Mosnier J, Amalvict R, Fusai T, Rogier C, Pradines B: Plasmodium falciparum Na+/H+ exchanger 1 transporter is involved in reduced susceptibility to quinine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 1926-1930. 10.1128/AAC.01243-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wurtz N, Briolant S, Gil M, Parquet V, Henry M, Baret E, Amalvict R, Almeras L, Rogier C, Pradines B: Synergy of mefloquine activity with atorvastatin, but not chloroquine and monodesethylamodiaquine, and association with the pfmdr1 gene. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010, 65: 1387-1394. 10.1093/jac/dkq173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bogreau H, Renaud F, Bouchiba H, Durand P, Assi SB, Henry MC, Garnotel E, Pradines B, Fusai T, Wade B, Adehossi E, Parola P, Kamil MA, Puijalon O, Rogier C: Genetic diversity and structure of African Plasmodium falciparum populations in urban and rural areas. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 953-959.Google Scholar
  24. Doudier B, Bogreau H, DeVries A, Poncon N, Stauffer WM, Fontenille D, Rogier C, Parola P: Possible autochthonous malaria from Marseille to Minneapolis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 1236-1238. 10.3201/eid1308.070143.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Legrand E, Volney B, Lavergne A, Tournegros C, Florent L, Accrombessi D, Guillotte M, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Esterre P: Molecular analysis of two local falciparum malaria outbreaks on the French Guiana Coast confirms the msp1 B-K1/varD genotype association with severe malaria. Malar J. 2005, 4: 26-10.1186/1475-2875-4-26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kessl JJ, Ha KH, Merritt AK, Lange BB, Hill P, Meunier B, Meshnick SR, Trumpower BL: Cytochrome b mutations that modify the ubiquinol-binding pocket of the cytochrome bc1 complex and confer anti-malarial drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 17142-17148. 10.1074/jbc.M500388200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Srivastava IK, Rottenberg H, Vaidya AB: Atovaquone, a broad spectrum antiparasitic drug, collapses mitochondrial membrane potential in a malarial parasite. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 3961-3966. 10.1074/jbc.272.7.3961.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Srivastava IK, Vaidya AB: A mechanism for the synergistic antimalarial action of atovaquone‐proguanil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 1334-1339.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vaidya AB, Mather MW: Atovaquone resistance in malaria parasites. Drug Resist Updat. 2000, 3: 283-287. 10.1054/drup.2000.0157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. GlaxoSmithKlineInc: Malarone. GSK Product Monograph Research Triangle Park. 2004, GSK, NCGoogle Scholar
  31. Hussein Z, Eaves CJ, Hutchinson DB, Canfield CJ: Population pharmacokinetics of proguanil in patients with acute P. falciparum malaria after combined therapy with atovaquone. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996, 42: 589-597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sukwa TY, Mulenga M, Chisdaka N, Roskell NS, Scott TR: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial to determine the efficacy and safety of Malarone (atovaquone-proguanil) for the prophylaxis of malaria in Zambia. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 1999, 60: 521-525.Google Scholar
  33. Hussein Z, Eaves J, Hutchinson DB, Canfield CJ: Population pharmacokinetics of atovaquone in patients with acute malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997, 61: 518-530. 10.1016/S0009-9236(97)90132-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Binh VQ, Chinh NT, Thanh NX, Cuong BT, Quang NN, Dai B, Travers T, Edstein MD: Sex affects the steady-state pharmacokinetics of primaquine but not doxycycline in healthy subjects. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 747-753.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gschwend MH, Martin W, Erenmemisoglu A, Scherm M, Dilger C, Tamur U, Kanzik I, Hincal AA: Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of doxycycline capsules in healthy male subjects. Arzneimittelforschung. 2007, 57: 347-351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. WHO: Susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs. Report on global monitoring : 1996–2004. 2005, World Health Organization, Geneva, Report No.: WHO/HTM/MAL/2005.1103Google Scholar
  37. White NJ: Why is it that antimalarial drug treatments do not always work?. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998, 92: 449-458. 10.1080/00034989859429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wurtz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.