- Research
- Open Access
Effectiveness and durability of Interceptor® long-lasting insecticidal nets in a malaria endemic area of central India
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-189
© Bhatt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 1 March 2012
- Accepted: 19 May 2012
- Published: 10 June 2012
Abstract
Background
In the present study, Interceptor®, long-lasting polyester net, 75 denier and bursting strength of minimum 250 kPa coated with alpha-cypermethrin @ 200 mg/m2 was evaluated for its efficacy in reducing the mosquito density, blood feeding inhibition and malaria incidence in a tribal dominated malaria endemic area in Chhattisgarh state, central India. Its durability, washing practices and usage pattern by the community was also assessed up to a period of three years.
Methods
The study was carried out in two phases. In the first phase (September 2006 to August 2007), 16 malaria endemic villages in district Kanker were randomized into three groups, viz. Interceptor net (LN), untreated polyester net (100 denier) and without net. Malaria cases were detected by undertaking fortnightly surveillance by home visits and treated as per the national drug policy. Mosquito collections were made by hand catch and pyrethrum space spray methods from human dwellings once every month. Slide positivity rate (SPR) and malaria incidence per 1000 population (PI) were compared between the three study arms to assess the impact of use of Interceptor nets. Simultaneously, wash resistance studies were carried out in the laboratory by doing cone bioassays on Interceptor LNs washed up to 20 times. Activities undertaken in second Phase (April 2008 to October 2009) after an interval of about 18 months post-net distribution included questionnaire based surveys at every six months, i.e. 18, 24, 30 and 36 months to observe durability, usage pattern of LNs and washing practices by the community. After 36 months of field use, 30 nets were retrieved and sampled destructively for chemical analysis.
Results
Interceptor nets were found effective in reducing the density, parity rate and blood feeding success rate of main malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies as compared to that in untreated net and no net villages. SPR in LN villages was 3.7% as compared to 6.5% in untreated and 11% in no net villages. PI in LN villages was 16.4 in comparison to 24.8 and 44.2 in untreated polyester net and no net villages respectively. In surveys carried out after three years of initial distribution, 78.7% (737/936) nets were still in possession with the households, of which 68% were used every night. An. culicifacies mortality was >80% in cone bioassays done on LNs washed up to 20 times in laboratory. Mean alpha-cypermethrin content was 43.5 ± 31.7 mg/m2 on Interceptor LNs withdrawn after three years of household use against the baseline specification of 200 mg/m2. A gradual increase in the proportion of holed nets was observed with the increased period of usage.
Conclusion
Interceptor nets were highly effective in reducing vector densities as well as malaria incidence in the study villages. Availability of 78% nets with the households in usable condition clearly indicated durability of Interceptor LNs up to three years in the rural setting of India. The nets were found to contain an effective concentration of alpha-cypermethrin against malaria vector after three years of household use.
Keywords
- Anopheles culicifacies
- Bioassay
- Density
- Interceptor nets
- Malaria
- Mosquitoes
Background
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LNs) are being widely promoted for malaria vector control in malaria endemic countries [1]. The use of LNs is an effective intervention method with an efficacy lasting about three to five years. The World Health Organization has given full recommendation to Olyset®, PermaNet® 2.0 and Yorkool® LNs, while interim recommendation has been given to Interceptor® and several other LN brands [2].
The Interceptor® LN is manufactured by M/s. Sunshine World Net 2003 Co. Ltd. Ratchaburi, Thailand, under the license of M/s. BASF Agro B.V. Arnhem (NL) Wädenswil Branch, BP 69, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland and distributed by BASF. The specifications of Interceptor nets used in the present study were 100% polyester, multifilament yarn: 75 denier with a minimum 250 kPa bursting strength, mesh: 24 holes/cm2; density: 30 ± 2 g/m2; active ingredient: 200 mg/m2 alpha-cypermethrin coated on polyester fibers. The nets used measured 180 cm in length, 160 cm width and 150 cm height, and had a total surface area of 13.92 m². WHOPES supervised laboratory and field trials have demonstrated wash resistance and efficacy of Interceptor nets [3]. Field trials carried out with alpha-cypermethrin treated bed nets have shown promising results in terms of efficacy against mosquito vectors and malaria incidence in India [4, 5].
Various field trials have shown further evidence that Interceptor nets are effective against malaria vectors in different countries or settings [6–10]. WHOPES has made interim recommendations for use of Interceptor nets for prevention and control of malaria based on a Phase II study, and requires large-scale field studies for making full recommendations for the use of these nets in the national malaria control programme.
Chhattisgarh state in India is endemic for malaria. The hilly forested and tribal dominated districts, 5 in the north and 3 in the south including Kanker, contribute >90% of the reported malaria cases. In 2010, the state ranked third by reporting about 10% of the total malaria cases and 14% of Plasmodium falciparum cases in the country [11]. Anopheles culicifacies is the main malaria vector. Malaria continues to be a major health problem especially in difficult to reach areas. In view of this, an evaluation of Interceptor LNs was undertaken in district Kanker to assess the impact on vector density, malaria incidence, bio-efficacy and durability over a three-year period. While plenty of scientific evidence shows effectiveness of treated nets, little is known about durability of various brands of long-lasting insecticidal nets under operational conditions of use and therefore this element of the study makes it important and highly relevant to the national malaria control programme.
Methods
Study area
The map showing the location of study villages.
For the purpose of the study, villages under Amoda Community Health Centre (CHC) were selected. CHC Amoda provides health services to a population of about 0.13 million. The CHC has 36 sections each comprising of about 4,000 population living in three to five villages. Malaria surveillance is carried out by a male and a female Multi-Purpose Health Worker (MPHW-M/F) in each section by undertaking fortnightly door-to-door visits. Surveillance in the study villages was strengthened by deploying two trained local volunteers in each of the study arm. Blood slides were prepared from febrile cases and anti-malarials were administered to all microscopically confirmed malaria positive cases as per the national drug policy. Based on previous year’s malaria incidence data, villages with >2 API qualify to receive two rounds of indoor residual spraying (IRS) of insecticide. Under the national programme in district Kanker, synthetic pyrethroids have been used for IRS since mid-1990. No IRS was undertaken in villages selected for the trial during the first phase of the study (September 2006 to August 2007) and also during 2008. However, two rounds of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin 5% WP were given in study villages with >2 API during 2009.
Selection of study villages and distribution of nets
Village level malaria information for the year 2006 was retrieved from the CHC records and after careful consideration, 16 villages with varying degree of endemicity were identified for the study. Baseline data on malaria incidence and mosquito density were generated for three months from September to November 2006 from all villages before randomizing them into three arms, viz. Interceptor net (LN), untreated polyester net (UN) and no net. A population census was carried out in every village during the pre-intervention period and all the houses in the selected villages identified for net distribution were numbered. The census also revealed that about 1.13 nets/house were owned by the community. Interceptor nets, rectangular netting consisting of 75 denier multifilament, 100% polyester, with minimum 250 kPa bursting strength, mesh: 24 holes/cm2; density: 30 ± 2 g/m2; active ingredient: 200 mg/m2 alpha-cypermethrin coated on polyester fibers, warp knitting and untreated polyester nets (100% polyester, multifilament yarn: 100 denier strength with a minimum 405 kPa bursting strength, mesh: 24 holes/cm2; density: 30 ± 2 g/m2) were distributed free of cost during November 2006. A total of 932 Interceptor nets (one net per house) were distributed in five villages (population 5316; parasite incidence (PI)/1000 population-14.3); similarly, 909 untreated polyester nets were given in six villages (population 4802; PI-6.6) and another group of five villages (population 3865; PI-3.1) was kept as no net control area. Investigators ensured to cover all the target population in the villages for distribution of nets. Active surveillance was strengthened in all study villages by ensuring the adequate supply of materials with the MPHWs for better management of the disease during the trial period. Inhabitants were educated about the proper usage, storage, washing and up-keep of nets.
Ethical approval and informed consent
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India. Villagers were informed about the aims and objectives of the study through house-to-house contact and group meetings. The written consent of each household was obtained for his/her willingness to participate in the study before distributing the nets. Information on various aspects of the study was read in the local language for obtaining their written consent.
Mosquito collections
Mosquito collections were made from four fixed dwelling rooms during the morning hours (0600–0800 hrs) in two villages in each of the three study arms once every month. Resting mosquitoes were caught using an aspirator and flash light for fifteen minutes each employing a trained person on mosquito collection. Employing two trained personnel, the room was then sprayed with pyrethrum solution (0.2% in kerosene) using hand held atomizers and after 15 min all mosquitoes found dead on the floor-sheets were collected and transferred into paper cups with moist cotton pad at the bottom to prevent desiccation. Mosquito species were identified and their abdominal condition was recorded. Unfed An. culicifacies were dissected for parity using the WHO procedure [12]. Baseline mosquito collection was carried out for three months before setting up sentinel rooms for organizing routine monthly monitoring. WHO tube test using 0.1% alpha-cypermethrin impregnated papers (diagnostic dose) was conducted to determine the susceptibility of wild caught An. culicifacies in the beginning of the study.
Assessment of usage pattern, net washing behaviour and physical aspects of nets
Using a structured pre-tested questionnaire, adult households were interviewed to assess the net usage pattern, net washing behaviour and physical integrity of the net. In all, four surveys were carried out at six-monthly intervals at 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-net distribution in Interceptor villages. In the first three surveys, questionnaire was administered to about 10% of the households selected randomly. Houses once surveyed were excluded from the subsequent surveys. However, in the survey carried out after three years of net distribution, all houses which were initially given the Interceptor LN were surveyed. The houses were checked for physical possession of the nets.
All the nets were examined for the presence, size (by measuring diameter in cm) and location of holes, tears, burns, open seams, stitches and knots. Based on the size, holes were grouped into four categories, viz. Size 1: smaller than a thumb (0.5–2 cm), Size 2: larger than a thumb but smaller than a fist (2–10 cm), Size 3: larger than a fist but smaller than a head (10–25 cm) and Size 4: larger than a head (>25 cm) and respectively weighed as 1, 23, 196 and 576 [13]. Hole index for each net was calculated as: (1 × no. of size − 1holes) + (23 × no. of size − 2holes) + (196 × no. of size − 3holes) + (576 × no. of size − 4holes).
Wash resistance and bio-efficacy of interceptor LNs
Four Interceptor LNs and two untreated nets were washed 20 times in the laboratory. Nets were washed separately and individually in plastic tubs. A teaspoon full of Surf Excel® (washing powder, M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd, Mumbai, India) was dissolved in five litres of tap water (26 ± 2°C) and nets were rinsed four to five times and, thereafter two to three times in clean water before hanging on laundry line under shade for drying for 24 h. Nets were stored under the optimal room temperature and humidity between the washes. Bioassays were conducted after two to three days post washing. On each net a cone was fixed and held in place using a rubber band. Laboratory-reared An. culicifacies mosquitoes (sugar fed, 2–5 day old), susceptible to alpha-cypermethrin were introduced into each cone and exposed for 3 min [14]. This was repeated twice on each of the four cones fixed on four nets. Thus, a total of 60 and 30 mosquitoes were exposed on Interceptor LNs and untreated polyester nets respectively. Number of mosquitoes knocked-down after one hour and mortality after 24 hour of exposure were recorded. The WHO criteria for efficacy is ≥95% knock-down after one hour and ≥80% mortality after 24 hour. Abbott’s formula was applied for correcting the mortality in test replicates if the mortality in control replicates was between 5 and 20%. If the mortality in control replicates was >20%, the tests were discarded.
Sampling for chemical analysis
After 36 months of household use in the field, 30 Interceptor LNs were retrieved from thirty households randomly selected from all the study villages. New Interceptor LN was provided in lieu of withdrawn net. From each of the 30 LNs, four pieces of 30 cm × 30 cm size were cut from positions 2 to 5 as per WHO protocol using sharp scissors. Four sub-samples were assembled as one sample, rolled up and placed in a new, clean aluminium foil, labeled and stored at +4°C prior to dispatch to Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium for chemical assay which is a WHO collaborating centre. Sample from position 1 was not cut since netting fabric at this position is subjected to excessive abrasion in routine use (this portion of net is frequently manipulated while tucking the nets under the bed/mattress). Analytical method RESSM016 of the Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-W) was used. The analytical method was already validated and is ISO 17025 accredited for alpha-cypermethrin in coated LNs. Results were expressed as g alpha-cypermethrin (cis II) / kg and converted to mg alpha-cypermethrin (cis II)/m² using the density [15].
Statistical analysis
All the data were entered in MS Excel and statistical analysis was performed using Excel programme. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test and continuous discrete variables were tested using Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the significance among the three study areas. A p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.
Results
Entry rate of mosquitoes determined by pyrethrum spray collections in rooms with Interceptor LNs, untreated nets and no net
Mosquito species | No. of rooms | Interceptor | Untreated net | No net | ANOVA | Chi-square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Females / room | % blood fed | Females / room | % blood fed | Females / room | % blood fed | Females/ room | Blood fed | ||
Pre-intervention (Sep-Nov 2006) | |||||||||
An. culicifacies | 8 | 3.5 | 28.5 | 2.4 | 31.5 | 4 | 40.1 | F2,9 = 0.35; P = 0.708 | χ2= 1.4; p=0.55 |
Other anophelines | 8 | 7.3 | 24.1 | 4.4 | 51.4 | 7.5 | 40 | F2,9 = 0.40; P = 0.68 | χ2= 7.24; p=0.02 |
Culicines | 8 | 8 | 43.7 | 6 | 41.6 | 22.5 | 38.3 | F2,9 = 0.63; p = 0.55 | χ2 = 0.638; p=0.72 |
Intervention (Dec 2006-Aug 2007) | |||||||||
An. culicifacies | 36 | 2.9 | 9.6 | 8.5 | 22.4 | 22.9 | 26.6 | F2,51 = 11.5; p = 0.0003 | χ2= 15.8; p<0.0001 |
Other anophelines | 36 | 26.5 | 5.5 | 123.3 | 21 | 199.3 | 28.1 | F2,51 = 2; p = 0.144 | χ2 =266; p=0.0001 |
Culicines | 36 | 8.3 | 28.2 | 23 | 59.1 | 16.1 | 48 | F2,51 = 3.42; p = 0.04 | χ2 = 49.3; p=0.0001 |
During the intervention period, the number of An. culicifacies mosquitoes collected from Interceptor net villages was significantly less than that of in the untreated polyester net and no net villages (F = 11.5; p = 0.0003). Similar results were obtained for Culex spp. as well (F = 3.42; p < 0.05), however, the number of other anophelines caught from the three study areas did not vary significantly (p > 0.05). The proportion of blood fed females among all collected mosquitoes decreased considerably in Interceptor net villages and the results were statistically significant among the three study areas (p < 0.0001). The results clearly indicated the impact of Interceptor LNs in reducing the prevalence and blood feeding of An. culicifacies.
Unfed An. culicifacies collected from human dwellings (hand collection + pyrethrum spray collection) were dissected for parity. Parity rates during the intervention period of 9 months (December 2006 to August 2007) were 17.2% (27/157), 43.9% (58/132) and 28.2% (74/262) respectively in Interceptor net, untreated polyester net and no net villages. Parity rate of An. culicifacies mosquitoes in Interceptor net villages was much lower than that of the untreated net and no net villages (χ2 = 25.1; p < 0.0001) indicating reduction in vector longevity in the former as compared to the latter group of villages.
Results of fever surveillance in villages with Interceptor LNs, untreated nets and no net during pre- intervention and intervention phases
Attributes | Interceptor net | Untreated net | No Net | P- value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
(Pop. 5316) | (Pop. 4802) | (Pop. 3865) | ||
Pre-intervention (Sep-Nov 2006) | ||||
No. of slides collected | 902 | 447 | 377 | |
P. vivax | 0 | 5 | 3 | |
P. falciparum | 76 | 26 | 9 | |
Slide Positivity Rate (SPR) | 8.4 | 6.9 | 3.2 | χ2=11.4; p=0.003 |
Parasite incidence/1000 population | 14.3 | 6.6 | 3.1 | |
Intervention (Dec 2006-Aug 2007) | ||||
No. of slides collected | 2348 | 1836 | 1151 | |
P. vivax | 0 | 17 | 21 | |
P. falciparum | 87 | 102 | 150 | |
Slide Positivity Rate (SPR) | 3.7 | 6.5 | 11 | χ2=81.5; p=0.000 |
Parasite incidence/1000 population | 16.4 | 24.8 | 44.2 | |
Results of laboratory cone bioassays against An. culicifacies exposed on untreated nets and Interceptor LNs
No. of | Untreated net* | Interceptor LN | Corrected | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
washes | % 1 h knockdown | 24 h mortality | % killed | % 1 h knockdown | 24 h mortality | % killed | mortality (%) |
0 | 0 | 1 | 3.3 | 96.7 | 60 | 100 | 100 |
5 | 0 | 1 | 3.3 | 98.3 | 59 | 98.3 | 98.3 |
10 | 0 | 1 | 3.3 | 96.7 | 54 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
15 | 0 | 1 | 3.3 | 95.0 | 51 | 85.0 | 85.0 |
20 | 0 | 1 | 3.3 | 95.0 | 52 | 86.7 | 86.7 |
Results of questionnaire based survey of households on net usage pattern and washing behaviour at different intervals after Interceptor LN distribution
Parameters | Months of observations* | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 months | 24 months | 30 months | 36 months | |||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
i) Net usage | ||||||||
- year round and every night | 26 | 26.8 | 30 | 30.9 | 32 | 33.0 | 199 | 27.2 |
- year round but occasionally | 15 | 15.5 | 15 | 15.5 | 23 | 23.7 | 58 | 8.0 |
- seasonally** but every night | 35 | 36.1 | 39 | 40.2 | 32 | 33.0 | 299 | 40.9 |
-seasonally** but occasionally | 21 | 21.6 | 13 | 13.4 | 10 | 10.3 | 175 | 23.9 |
ii) Proportion of nets washed | ||||||||
- washed nets | 89 | 91.8 | 92 | 94.8 | 89 | 91.8 | 699 | 95.6 |
Physical aspects of Interceptor LNs observed at different interval of distribution*
Parameters | Months of observation post-net distribution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 24 | 30 | 36 | |
No. of nets surveyed | 97 (10%) | 97 (10%) | 97 (10%) | 731 (78.4%) |
Proportion with any holes | 19.6% | 30.9% | 60.8% | 73.7% |
Average no. of holes/net | 2.7 (52/19) | 3.0 (91/30) | 3.7 (221/59) | 7.3 (3933/539) |
-size 1 | 1.5 | 1.06 | 1.5 | 5.1 |
-size 2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
-size 3 | 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
-size 4 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.07 |
Mean hole index | 13.2 | 55.7 | 87.1 | 252.2 |
Proportion of holes/net | ||||
-lower half | 78.6 | 89.6 | 72.9 | 61.6 |
-upper half | 14.3 | 6.9 | 21.6 | 24.6 |
-roof | 7.1 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 13.8 |
Repairs/net | ||||
-stitches | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.7 |
-knots | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.4 |
-patches | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.003 |
Aspect of net | ||||
-clean | 56.7 | 58.8 | 41.2 | 42.5 |
-a bit dirty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.3 |
-dirty | 41.2 | 41.2 | 58.8 | 19.6 |
-very dirty | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 8.6 |
Proportion of nets found to be clean, a bit dirty, dirty and very dirty were 42.5, 29.3, 19.6 and 8.6%, respectively. The terminal survey revealed that 731 (78.4%) out of 932 nets distributed initially were found in possession of the households, 169 nets were found missing (an attrition rate of 18.1%) and 32 houses (3.2%) were found locked at the time of survey. Assuming an equal attrition rate of 18.1% in locked houses, then the overall percentage of nets available with the community after three years of distribution would come to 81.2%.
Results of chemical analysis revealed that 30 LNs withdrawn after three years of household use had mean alpha-cypermethrin (a.i.) content of 43.5 mg a.i./m2 (95% CI: 31.2, 55.8) which is equivalent to 1.24 g a.i./m2 (0.9, 1.58). Thus, there was a reduction of about 78% in alpha-cypermethrin content from the baseline specification of 200 mg/m2 in nets under household use after three years.
Discussion
Use of long lasting insecticidal nets is an effective intervention tool for protection from malaria. The present study showed that usage of nets reduced the feeding success rate of vector as well as other nuisance mosquitoes. Blood feeding inhibition was highest in Interceptor villages, which may be attributed to excito-repellent action of treated nets. There was a reduction in the vector density in Interceptor LN villages as compared to untreated and no net villages.
There was a decline in malaria incidence rate in villages with Interceptor nets during the intervention period as compared with that during the pre-intervention period and also in comparison to untreated and without net villages. Similar results were found in studies carried out in India and elsewhere [4–8].
In the present investigation, >80% mortality in An. culicifacies was reported in 20 times washed Interceptor nets, which is in agreement with the WHO criteria [14]. Compliance of use of nets every night was observed to be >60% in surveys carried out at different study intervals. In studies carried out in Uganda, 86% of Interceptor LNs were being regularly used by inhabitants even after three years [16]. The comparative lower usage found in the present study may be due to prevailing hot weather conditions during most parts of the year, except during the colder months from November to February.
The frequency of washing of nets ranged from one wash per year in 16% of households to 24 washes per year in about 4% of households. More than 80% of LNs were found washed in surveys carried out at different study intervals. In each survey about 30% of nets were found to be washed at six monthly intervals. As many as 13 brands of local soaps and soap powders were used by the villagers for washing the nets.
The households are habitual to sweep the house floor daily and burn jungle wood for cooking resulting in settling of dirt and soot over the nets. More so, if the kitchen is in proximity of the room in which the net is used. The reason for more frequent washes of nets in certain houses was related with the dirty looks given by the net which is considered to be unhealthy and socially unacceptable as it has been reported in studies carried out in urban Dar-es-Salaam [17].
The continuous use of nets resulted in the wear and tear. A gradual increase in the proportion of nets with any type of holes showed an increasing trend from 19.6% after 18 months to 73.7% after three years, which is in agreement with results obtained from western Uganda [16]. Major causes of wear and tear of the nets were due to rough handling, frequent washing, rat biting, damage caused by cats and occasionally chewing by cattle. In spite of all these adversaries, about 81% households had retained the nets after three years of distribution although a gradual increase in the hole index from 13.2 after 18 months to 252.2 after three years was observed. We did not find any net which was kept as a rag and not being used by the households during any of the surveys carried out after 18, 24, 30 and 36 months of net distribution. As a result of this the attrition rate largely remained unaffected.
Mean alpha-cypermethrin residue on the LNs after three years of household use showed a reduction of about 78% from the baseline specification, but still retaining a mean content of 43.5 mg/m2. Similar observations have been reported from western Uganda [16].
This study reports the effectiveness and durability of LN in a malaria endemic tribal dominated forested rural area in Indian sub-continent. LN as an intervention tool in this area is still in its infancy of implementation. The results of the present study are promising and therefore an intervention based on LN is strongly recommended in areas similar to the present one. This is based on the findings that tribal populations mud-plaster their houses half a dozen times during the year, which is done for the proper upkeep of mud-walled house. Under such situations, IRS with highly effective insecticide is unlikely to obtain desired epidemiological impact.
Conclusions
The Interceptor LNs were found to be effective in controlling the density of malaria vector An. culicifacies to a great extent. A significant decline in the overall entry rate of mosquitoes in LN houses was observed. Number of blood fed mosquitoes decreased considerably in LN houses and the results were found statistically significant on this aspect of the study. A decline in slide positivity rate occurred in the Interceptor net villages as compared to untreated polyester net and no net villages. Despite the short duration of the study parasite incidence in the LN villages remained comparable during the pre-intervention and post–intervention periods. However, the above indicator showed an increasing trend in untreated net and no net villages.
Interceptor LNs retained effective bio-efficacy causing >80% mortality in An. culicifacies and withstood 20 laboratory washes using a locally available detergent powder. The community compliance and acceptance was high and no side effects were reported during the entire course of the study. The users required better awareness about the upkeep of nets and washing practices. With very high retention rate (survivorship), physical condition of the nets (fabric integrity) and an availability of effective insecticide content it can be safely said that Interceptor LNs have a durability of three years. Thus the duration of an effective intervention based on Interceptor LN can safely be estimated to be of about three years under the environmental conditions prevailing in central part of India.
Declarations
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to M/S BASF India Ltd. for gratis supply of Interceptor LNs, untreated nets, for sponsoring chemical analysis at Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium and publication of this paper. Technical help provided by the staff of NIMR Field Unit, Raipur and local support and facilities to establish field laboratory provided by the Block Medical Officer, CHC Amoda and District Malaria Officer, Kanker is gratefully acknowledged.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Guillet P, Alnwick D, Cham MK, Neira M, Zaim M, Heymann D, Mukelabai K: Long-lasting treated mosquito nets: a break through in malaria prevention. Bull World Health Organ. 2001, 79: 998-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- WHO: WHO recommended long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets. 2011, World Health Organization, Geneva, Available from: http://www.who.int/whopes/Long_lasting_insecticidal_nets_Jan_2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Report of the tenth WHOPES working group meeting. 2006, World Health Organization, Geneva, Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2007/WHO_CDS_NTD_WHOPES_2007_1_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Ansari MA, Razdan RK: Bio-efficacy and operational feasibility of alphacypermethrin (Fendona) impregnated mosquito nets to control rural malaria in northern India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2003, 40: 33-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sahu SS, Jambulingam P, Vijayakumar T, Subramanian S, Kalyanasundaram M: Impact of alpha-cypermethrin treated bed nets on malaria in villages of Malkangiri district, Orissa, India. Acta Trop. 2003, 89: 55-66. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.07.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dev V, Raghavendra K, Singh SP, Phookan S, Khound K, Dash AP: Wash resistance and residual efficacy of long-lasting polyester netting coated with alpha-cypermethrin (Interceptor) against malaria-transmitting mosquitoes in Assam, northeast India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 104: 273-278. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma SK, Upadhyaya AK, Haque MA, Tyagi PK, Raghavendra K, Dash AP: Wash-resistance and field evaluation of alpha-cypermethrin treated long-lasting insecticidal net (Interceptor®) against malaria vectors Anopheles culicifacies and Anopheles fluviatilis in a tribal area of Orissa, India. Acta Trop. 2010, 116: 24-30. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banek K, Kilian A, Allan R: Evaluation of interceptor long-lasting insecticidal nets in eight communities in Liberia. Malar J. 2010, 9: 84-10.1186/1475-2875-9-84.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mosha FW, Lyimo IN, Oxborough RM, Matowo J, Malima R, Feston E, Mndeme R, Tenu F, Kulkarni M, Maxwell CA, Magesa SM, Rowland MW: Comparative efficacies of permethrin- deltamethrin- and alpha-cypermethrin-treated nets, against Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus in northern Tanzania. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008, 102: 367-376. 10.1179/136485908X278829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maxwell CA, Chambo W, Mwaimu M, Magogo F, Carneiro IA, Curtis CF: Variation of malaria transmission and morbidity with altitude in Tanzania and with introduction of alphacypermethrin treated nets. Malar J. 2003, 2: 28-10.1186/1475-2875-2-28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme: Malaria situation in India. Available from http://www.nvbdcp.gov.in/malaria-new.html
- WHO: Malaria entomology and vector control, learner’s guide. World Health Organization, Geneva, Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/WHO_CDS_CPE_SMT_2002.18_Rev.1_PartI.pdf
- WHO: Guidelines for monitoring the durability of long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets under operational conditions. World Health Organization, Geneva, Available on the internet at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501705_eng.pdf
- WHO: Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets. 2005, World Health Organization, Geneva, WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2005.11Google Scholar
- WHO: WHO Specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides: Alpha-cypermethrin long-lasting (coated onto filaments) insecticidal net.http://www.who.int/whopes/quality/Alphacypermethrin_Interceptor_specs_eval_WHO_Oct_2009.pdf,
- Kilian A, Byamukama W, Pigeon O, Gimnig J, Atieli F, Koekemoer L, Protopopoff N: Evidence for a useful life of more than three years for a polyester-based long-lasting insecticidal mosquito net in Western Uganda. Malar J. 2011, 10: 299-10.1186/1475-2875-10-299.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller JE, Jones COH, Ndunguru S, Curtis V, Lines J: A new strategy for treating nets. Part 2: users’ perceptions of efficacy and washing practices and their implications for insecticide dosage. Trop Med Int Health. 1999, 4: 167-174. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.43378.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.