Skip to main content

Helminth-infected patients with malaria: a low profile transmission hub?


Eclipsed by the debates about malaria incidence and severity in individual patients, malaria transmission in helminth-infected persons has so far received very little attention. Studies in humans have shown increased malaria incidence and prevalence, and a trend for a reduction of symptoms in patients with malaria. This suggests that such patients could possibly be less likely to seek treatment thus carrying malaria parasites and their gametocytes for longer durations, therefore, being a greater potential source of transmission. In addition, in humans, a study showed increased gametocyte carriage, and in an animal model of helminth-malaria co-infection, there was increased malaria transmission. These elements converge towards the hypothesis that patients co-infected with worms and malaria may represent a hub of malaria transmission. The test of this hypothesis requires verifying, in different epidemiological settings, that helminth-infected patients have more gametocytes, that they have less symptomatic malaria and longer-lasting infections, and that they are more attractive for the vectors. The negative outcome in one setting of one of the above aspects does not necessarily mean that the other two aspects may suffice to increase transmission. If it is verified that patients co-infected by worms and malaria could be a transmission hub, this would be an interesting piece of strategic information in the context of the spread of anti-malarial resistance and the malaria eradication attempts.


In the past decade, the topic of interactions between worms and malaria has generated a surge of interest with over 35 publications reporting findings in humans from different continents. Similarly, there have been over 25 publications on different animal models of co-infection between worms and malaria[1]. So far, the various study designs used have yielded snapshots of information about specific endpoints but no dynamic view of what happens today or what used to take place in the pre-therapeutic era. Most of the publications on co-infections in humans focussed on whether malaria was more or less frequent or whether malaria was more or less severe in patients with worms. These are important topics, and with time and more and more data points, a pattern now seems to have emerged, with hookworm regularly linked to an increase of malaria and Ascaris regularly linked to a decrease in malaria and malaria severity. Hypothetical mechanisms have been put forward: the immunomodulation of the host response on one side, and the increased attractiveness of the anaemic host for the vectors presumably leading to an increase of the number of mosquito bites on the other side. The apparent discrepancies between authors may also have resulted from the very different study designs ranging from cross sectional studies to randomized trials, with exposure to worms considered one species at a time or pooled together. It is also possible that the overlapping environmental envelopes of Plasmodium and worms may also have led to some of the observed associations. Hopefully, interest in this topic will be sustained leading to a better understanding of mechanisms which underpin it.

The hypothesis

Eclipsed by the debates about malaria incidence and severity in individual patients, malaria transmission in helminth-infected persons is an area that has so far received very little attention. The present hypothesis is mostly constructed from the available studies in humans, but also from animal models. It attempts to connect observations of variable reliability given the study designs used to obtain the information. In this hypothesizing exercise, refraining from attempting to connect the dots in order to avoid type 1 errors (wrongly rejecting the status quo) would be a mistake. It is just a hypothesis, and to be tested. If it is false then nothing changes, but if it is true the implications would not be trivial. The hypothesis may appear piecemeal, but the general idea is that the various observations made so far seem to converge towards the ultimate amplification of transmission.

In 2001, cross-sectional data from Thailand showed a two-fold increase in gametocyte carriage linked to decreased haemoglobin in helminth-infected patients[2]. There have been so far no attempts to replicate these findings in humans elsewhere. Furthermore, an animal model using BALB/C mice infected with Echinostoma caproni and Plasmodium yoelii showed enhanced transmission with a two-fold increase of transmission to mosquitoes fed on co-infected mice relative to mice with Plasmodium only[3]. Despite the potential epidemiological importance of these findings research remains focussed on more obvious clinical aspects. Arguably though, the pieces of the puzzle of knowledge accumulated so far in humans also points towards the question of transmission. Some of the findings suggested there was an increase in incidence[48], and other studies pointed towards an increase in prevalence[911]. Prevalence (P), the number of persons with malaria at a point in time is influenced on the one hand by the incidence (I), the number of new infections and on the other hand by the duration (D) of these infections (patients may get cured, or may die). The classic formula P=IxD implies that prevalence will increase if incidence increases and /or if infection duration increases.

The cross-sectional studies finding increased malaria prevalence among helminth-infected patients could not determine whether prevalence was higher because incidence was higher or whether prevalence was higher because malaria lasted longer in helminth-infected patients, or both. Some studies have definitely shown increased incidence of malaria in helminth-infected patients. No studies have looked if malaria lasted longer in helminth-infected patients. However, there are converging elements that point towards such a possibility. The general trend so far was that malaria was less “noisy” in helminth-infected patients: less fever[12], lower parasitaemia[1315], less severe symptoms[1618], and in some cases less anaemia[19, 20]. In some of the above studies malaria was asymptomatic and more frequent in helminth-infected patients. Other studies showed that anthelmintics exacerbated malaria. The study by Murray et al. showed that piperazine treatment of Ascaris-infected patients led to an early increase (6–14 days) of malaria suggesting that the parasites had been there all along without causing clinical malaria[21]. In poor tropical areas, healthcare is often sought at very advanced stages of disease, it is reasonable to wonder whether these helminth-infected patients with fewer symptoms wait more to consult, or even never consult while all along they carry malaria parasites and their gametocytes for prolonged periods of time.

Testing the hypothesis

The transmission hypothesis is a combination of different components: the increased in gametocyte carriage, the increased duration of infection, and the increased attractivity of the host for the vector. A first step, possibly very easy to test by re-analysing available data would be to verify whether gametocyte carriage is affected by worms. Another step would be to determine whether humans with worms are really more attractive for vectors, and to look at the importance haemoglobin concentration as a proximal determinant. Finally, the bottom of the malaria iceberg represented by asymptomatic Plasmodium infections should be described in relation to worms using sensitive methods. Testing the hypothesis that the duration of infection increases in patients with worms would require observing patients with asymptomatic malaria longitudinally, without treating them, which may pose ethical problems and thus be difficult to test in humans.

The hypothesis seems rather robust since the local or general refutation of one of these three aspects would not necessarily imply that malaria has no effect on transmission because the other two could still be operating.

The implications

Whether the mechanism of pauci-symptomatic malaria in patients with worms is immunological or linked to nutritional consequences of worms[22], or both, remains to be seen. If this scenario is correct, then helminth-infected patients could constitute a major source of transmission. Furthermore, if it is confirmed that they are also more likely to harbour circulating gametocytes, and to attract mosquitoes as they become anaemic, the transmission potential could be even higher. Thus, the increase in incidence that seems linked to hookworm and the reduction of morbidity and severity mostly observed with Ascaris converges towards the creation of a smouldering reservoir for prolonged malaria transmission. The increased incidence and prevalence, combined with some observations found increased multiplicity of infection[23], and increased mixed vivax falciparum co-infections in patients with worms[24] suggest that the diversity of parasites could be greater in helminth-infected patients. This could theoretically speed the acquisition of premunition in individuals. In addition, the increased genetic diversity of the oocysts in the mosquitoes having fed on coinfected patients could theoretically lead to a more genetically diverse malaria parasites circulating in the population. The evolutionary implications of co-infections could also extend to the reproduction of worms, which have an interest in protecting their host to survive and reproduce[25].

In a given place, what proportion of transmission is attributable to asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic patients is not known. At a time when malaria eradication is discussed and drug resistance is spreading, it seems important to test the possibility that helminth-infected populations, notably by a combination of hookworm and Ascaris, could constitute a transmission hub for malaria parasites. The hookworm vaccine aimed at reducing the loss of haemoglobin could thus have unforeseen benefits.


  1. Nacher M: Interactions between worms and malaria: good worms or bad worms?. Malar J. 2011, 10: 259-10.1186/1475-2875-10-259.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Silachamroon U, Treeprasertsu S, Krudsood S, Gay F, Mazier D, Looareesuwan S: Association of helminth infections with increased gametocyte carriage during mild falciparum malaria in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65: 644-647.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Noland GS, Graczyk TK, Fried B, Kumar N: Enhanced malaria parasite transmission from helminth co-infected mice. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 1052-1056.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Yimsamran S, Manibunyong W, Thanyavanich N, Wuthisen R, Looareesuwan S: Intestinal helminth infections are associated with increased incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Thailand. J Parasitol. 2002, 88: 55-58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spiegel A, Tall A, Raphenon G, Trape JF, Druilhe P: Increased frequency of malaria attacks in subjects co-infected by intestinal worms and Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97: 198-199. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90117-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sokhna C, Le Hesran JY, Mbaye PA, Akiana J, Camara P, Diop M, Ly A, Druilhe P: Increase of malaria attacks among children presenting concomitant infection by schistosoma mansoni in Senegal. Malar J. 2004, 3: 43-10.1186/1475-2875-3-43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roussilhon C, Brasseur P, Agnamey P, Perignon JL, Druilhe P: Understanding human-plasmodium falciparum immune interactions uncovers the immunological role of worms. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e9309-10.1371/journal.pone.0009309.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adegnika AA, Ramharter M, Agnandji ST, Ateba Ngoa U, Issifou S, Yazdanbahksh M, Kremsner PG: Epidemiology of parasitic co-infections during pregnancy in lambarene, Gabon. Trop Med Int Health. 2010, 15: 1204-1209. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02598.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hillier SD, Booth M, Muhangi L, Nkurunziza P, Khihembo M, Kakande M, Sewankambo M, Kizindo R, Kizza M, Muwanga M, Elliott AM: Plasmodium falciparum and helminth coinfection in a semi urban population of pregnant women in Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 920-927. 10.1086/591183.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Midzi N, Sangweme D, Zinyowera S, Mapingure MP, Brouwer KC, Munatsi A, Mutapi F, Mudzori J, Kumar N, Woelk G, Mduluza T: The burden of polyparasitism among primary schoolchildren in rural and farming areas in Zimbabwe. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 102: 1039-1045. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.05.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yatich NJ, Yi J, Agbenyega T, Turpin A, Rayner JC, Stiles JK, Ellis WO, Funkhouser E, Ehiri JE, Williams JH: Malaria and intestinal helminth co-infection among pregnant women in Ghana: prevalence and risk factors. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 80: 896-901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Traore B, Dejvorakul S, Phumratanaprapin W, Looareesuwan S, Gay F: Short report: hookworm infection is associated with decreased body temperature during mild plasmodium falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65: 136-137.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Briand V, Watier L, JY LEH, Garcia A, Cot M: Coinfection with Plasmodium falciparum and Schistosoma haematobium: protective effect of schistosomiasis on malaria in senegalese children?. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 72: 702-707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brutus L, Watier L, Hanitrasoamampionona V, Razanatsoarilala H, Cot M: Confirmation of the protective effect of ascaris lumbricoides on plasmodium falciparum infection: results of a randomized trial in Madagascar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 1091-1095.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Degarege A, Animut A, Legesse M, Erko B: Malaria severity status in patients with soil-transmitted helminth infections. Acta Trop. 2009, 112: 8-11. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nacher M, Gay F, Singhasivanon P, Krudsood S, Treeprasertsuk S, Mazier D, Vouldoukis I, Looareesuwan S: Ascaris lumbricoides infection is associated with protection from cerebral malaria. Parasite Immunol. 2000, 22: 107-113. 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2000.00284.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Silachamroon U, Treeprasertsuk S, Vannaphan S, Traore B, Gay F, Looareesuwan S: Helminth infections are associated with protection from malaria-related acute renal failure and jaundice in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65: 834-836.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Traore B, Vannaphan S, Gay F, Chindanond D, Franetich JF, Mazier D, Looareesuwan S: Helminth infections are associated with protection from cerebral malaria and increased nitrogen derivatives concentrations in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 66: 304-309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melo GC, Reyes-Lecca RC, Vitor-Silva S, Monteiro WM, Martins M, Benzecry SG, Alecrim MG, Lacerda MV: Concurrent helminthic infection protects schoolchildren with plasmodium vivax from anemia. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e11206-10.1371/journal.pone.0011206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kung’u JK, Goodman D, Haji HJ, Ramsan M, Wright VJ, Bickle QD, Tielsch JM, Raynes JG, Stoltzfus RJ: Early helminth infections are inversely related to anemia, malnutrition, and malaria and are not associated with inflammation in 6- to 23-month-old Zanzibari children. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 1062-1070. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murray J, Murray A, Murray M, Murray C: The biological suppression of malaria: an ecological and nutritional interrelationship of a host and two parasites. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978, 3: 1363-1366.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nacher M, McGready R, Stepniewska K, Cho T, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F: Haematinic treatment of anaemia increases the risk of Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97: 273-276. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90140-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaorattanakawee S, Natalang O, Hananantachai H, Nacher M, Brockman A, Nosten F, Looareesuwan S, Patarapotikul J: Trichuris trichiura infection is associated with the multiplicity of plasmodium falciparum infections, in Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2003, 97: 199-202. 10.1179/000349803125002968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Gay F, Silachomroon U, Phumratanaprapin W, Looareesuwan S: Contemporaneous and successive mixed plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax infections are associated with ascaris lumbricoides: an immunomodulating effect?. J Parasitol. 2001, 87: 912-915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Krudsood S, Phumratanaprapin W, Vanaphan S, Tangpukdee N, Carme B, Looareesuwan S: Inverse relationship between the number of fertilized ascaris eggs excreted and fever, in patients coinfected with plasmodium vivax and ascaris lumbricoides. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2005, 99: 623-625. 10.1179/136485905X51364.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu Nacher.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nacher, M. Helminth-infected patients with malaria: a low profile transmission hub?. Malar J 11, 376 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: