Open Access

Hyperendemic malaria transmission in areas of occupation-related travel in the Peruvian Amazon

  • Benjamin S Parker1,
  • Maribel Paredes Olortegui2,
  • Pablo Peñataro Yori1,
  • Karin Escobedo3,
  • David Florin4,
  • Silvia Rengifo Pinedo2,
  • Roldan Cardenas Greffa5,
  • Luis Capcha Vega5,
  • Hugo Rodriguez Ferrucci5,
  • William K Pan6,
  • Cesar Banda Chavez2,
  • Joseph M Vinetz7 and
  • Margaret Kosek1Email author
Malaria Journal201312:178

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-178

Received: 7 February 2013

Accepted: 24 May 2013

Published: 31 May 2013

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum cause a significant illness burden in Peru. Anopheline indices for populated communities in the peri-Iquitos region of Loreto have been reported to be remarkably low, with entomological inoculation rates (EIR) estimated at one to 30 infective bites per year based on a few studies in close proximity to the urban centre of Iquitos and surrounding deforested areas. Local reports suggest that a large number of the reported cases are contracted outside of populated communities in undeveloped riverine areas frequented by loggers and fishermen.

Methods

To better understand vectorial capacity in suspected high malaria transmission zones in a rural district near Iquitos, Peru, mosquito collections were conducted at different points in the seasonality of malaria transmission in 21 sites frequented by occupational labourers. Prevalence of Plasmodium spp in vectors was determined by circumsporozoite protein ELISA on individual mosquitoes. Slide surveillance was performed for humans encountered in the zone.

Results

In total, of 8,365 adult female mosquitoes examined, 98.5% were identified as Anopheles darlingi and 117 (1.4%) tested positive for sporozoites (P. falciparum, P. vivax VK210 or P. vivax VK247). Measured human biting rates at these sites ranged from 0.102 to 41.13 bites per person per hour, with EIR values as high as 5.3 infective bites per person per night. Six percent of the 284 blood films were positive for P. vivax or P. falciparum; however, 88% of the individuals found to be positive were asymptomatic at the time of sampling.

Conclusions

The results of this study provide key missing indices of prominent spatial and temporal heterogeneity of vectorial capacity in the Amazon Basin of Peru. The identification of a target human subpopulation as a principal reservoir and dispersion source of Plasmodium species has important implications for vaccine development and the delivery of effective targeted malaria control strategies.

Keywords

MalariaEntomologyTransmission Anopheles darlingi Sporozoite rateEntomological inoculation rateAmazonPeru

Background

The history of malaria in Peru shows an expansion of malaria incidence over the past half-century following the eradication campaign of the 1960s when the malaria case burden in Peru fell to 1,500 cases reported nationwide in 1965, and remained at similar levels for approximately 20 years [1, 2]. In the Department of Loreto, the presence of Plasmodium falciparum first began to be reported between 1988 and 1991, followed shortly afterward by a malaria epidemic in the mid-1990s [3]. Reported cases of malaria nationwide in Peru reached a peak of 85,137 cases in 2005 [4], and in 2008 Peru reported the third highest number of malaria cases in the Americas, exceeded only by Brazil and Colombia [5]. Between 2005 and 2011, the nationwide case burden showed a steady decline, but data collected up to the 52nd epidemiological week of 2012 showed a slight malaria resurgence [6], breaking this trend. Of the cases in Peru, Plasmodium vivax remains more prevalent than P. falciparum, accounting for 27,523 of the malaria cases reported in 2012 (up to epidemiological week 52), approximately seven times the number of P. falciparum cases reported during the same period [6].

Accounting for approximately one-quarter of the geographical size of Peru, the Department of Loreto was reported to have a population of 942,457 inhabitants in 2007 and represents a large portion of the malaria case burden within Peru [7]. Up to the 52nd epidemiological week of 2012, Loreto reported 3,935 cases of P. falciparum and 21,048 cases of P. vivax, representing over 79% of all of the malaria cases reported in Peru during this time period [6]. Of the reported population, approximately 34.6% live in rural communities [7], where transmission is most intense [1]. Furthermore, because the major industries in the region include agriculture, fishing, logging and petroleum [1], a large portion of the population work as labourers that move between populated cities and large villages and rural areas with high malaria transmission to extract natural resources.

Previous studies have shown the existence of clusters of malaria transmission within populated communities and have suggested that focal “hot spots” of high malaria transmission may exist within areas with low levels of overall malaria incidence [3, 8]. Recent research has also begun to investigate the implications of human travel in the movement of malaria from zones of high transmission to low transmission, identifying “sources” and “sinks” of malaria sporozoites [9]. Based on observed patterns of travel and transmission, it is suspected that similar processes may be occurring in the peri-Iquitos region. To better understand the heterogeneity of transmission in this area, this study sought to characterize vector capacity and malaria transmission risk in several suspected hot zones frequented by labourers and river travellers. It was hypothesized that these remote sites would demonstrate higher entomological inoculation rates (EIRs) than have been reported for the region. This study yields new insights into regional population movements that more accurately account for the higher than expected malaria rates in populated areas in the peri-Iquitos region.

Methods

Study sites and mosquito collections

Mosquito collections were conducted at 21 sites along the Mazan River in the Department of Loreto, Peru (Table 1 and Figure 1). The principal port of access is the village of Mazan, a community with a population of 5,800 located at the confluence of the Napo and Mazan Rivers. The sites are located approximately 40 to 50 km north-east of the city centre of Iquitos, the capital of Loreto, and are routinely accessible only by boat. From Mazan, inhabitants depart upriver throughout the year to fish, extract wood, hunt, and harvest palm leaves used in thatched roof construction in larger towns. Mosquito collections were conducted over the course of three survey periods, planned to simulate trips upriver that would be taken by local fishermen or loggers. Mosquito captures took place at riverside camps separated by expected travel distances using a 9–13 hp motor on a dugout canoe, known locally as a peke-peke, the typical mode of transportation in the area. The camps surveyed have no permanent residents but are known sites that are frequented by labourers and were selected for this reason.
Table 1

GPS coordinates for mosquito collection sites located along the Mazan River in Loreto, Peru

Site code

Site name

Latitude

Longitude

Altitude (meters)

CAL

Quebrada Calentura

−73°53’35.80”

−2°54’7.68”

104.428

CPA

Cocha Paña

−73°46’58.18”

−2°57’9.35”

106.351

QPA

Quebrada Paña

−73°46’17.08”

−2°57’30.05”

97.4586

QBU

Quebrada Bufeo

−73°46’17.12”

−2°57’57.11”

102.986

CCC

Cocha Camu Camu

−73°41’22.27”

−3°0’41.18”

111.157

CUR

Copal Urco

−73°45’1.71”

−2°58’46.85”

103.226

MAP

Campamento Mapillo

−73°43’58.46”

−2°59’17.47”

108.994

QSA

Quebrada Sara

−73°41’48.44”

−3°0’59.39”

110.917

CCH

Cocha Chiriyacu

−73°39’43.89”

−3°1’47.57”

104.188

QAM1

Quebrada Armas - Campamento Ajisal

−73°37’54.05”

−3°6’24.75”

105.63

QAR*

Quebrada Armas

−73°37’11.28”

−3°5’3.56”

104.188

QAM2

Punisique

−73°36’12.92”

−3°3’50.50”

102.025

MAT*

Mapa Tipishca

−73°28’13.19”

−3°6’19.59”

106.591

ARA

Arahuana

−73°29’3.27”

−3°7’18.57”

98.1797

CTI

Cocha Tigre

−73°39’17.85”

−3°2’ 2.73”

104.668

CAM*

Campamento 2/N

−73°24’28.32”

−3°13’3.72”

102.265

CSC

Campamento Suricaño

−73°21’19.65”

−3°16’12.83”

96.7377

CPI

Cocha Piurí

−73°19’26.29”

−3°18’4.77”

99.6216

PCH

Cocha Paña

−73°46’55.81”

−2°57’8.78”

103.226

QPI*

Quebrada Piurí

−73°19’23.03”

−3°18’11.10”

96.978

ACH*

Quebrada Achual

−73°19’35.96”

−3°23’27.91”

110.677

Codes marked with an asterisk (*) denote sites that were serially-visited during all three survey periods.

Figure 1

Map of mosquito collection sites. Mosquito collection sites are located approximately 40 to 50 km outside of the city of Iquitos. Nearby populated communities are included as points of reference for location, and site names and GPS coordinates are listed in Table 1.

The survey periods were separated by approximately four months each and situated at different points relative to seasonal peaks and troughs in the incidence of clinical cases of malaria in the region. The timing of each trip was based on monthly P. falciparum indices from the prior year (Figure 2) that marked April-May as a peak, December-February as a trough, and July-August as a midpoint. The first survey trip lasted 14 nights in April 2008, the second five nights in July-August 2008, and the third six nights in January-February 2009. Five collection sites were common across all three surveys, and 16 additional sites were visited only once.
Figure 2

Monthly P. falciparum Index (MFI) data for the community of Mazan. MFI data from the community of Mazan for the year preceding the study was used to plan the timing of survey periods, allowing for the consideration only of recent infection rather than disease relapse. MFI is calculated as the number of reported P. falciparum cases per inhabitant per month.

Mosquitoes were collected from 1800–0700 by human landing capture and grouped by hour of collection and study site. Due to the low activity indices observed during the first survey period for the hours of 2200–0300 and 0600–0700, catches were abbreviated to 1800–2200 and 0300–0600 during the two subsequent survey periods. Collectors each exposed their lower legs and orally-aspirated landing mosquitoes, rotating shifts every two hours. The exact hours of collection and number of collectors varied slightly between nights, but were recorded to allow accurate calculation of person-hours spent collecting.

Collections were intradomiciliary and peridomiciliary if camps were inhabited. Where man-made shelters existed, they consisted of rudimentary structures with simple floors and roofs, lacking walls or an interior space separated from the outdoor environment. In cases where camps were not populated on the night that they were visited, collections took place at the most recent sites of human activity as demonstrated by the presence of campfire remnants, material that had been used in the of construction of camps, or other similar evidence of human habitation.

Specimens were separated and analysed by site and hour of capture. Upon return from each trip, female anophelines were identified to species in the laboratory using the morphological keys of Faran and Linthicum [10] and Consoli and Lourenço-de-Oliveira [11].

ELISA analysis

Head and thorax sections of captured anophelines were individually separated from abdomens to avoid detection of pre-infective circumsporozoite protein present in midguts. Using the standard protocol distributed by the MR4 [12] and the specified monoclonal antibodies obtained from the Centers for Disease Control, mosquitoes were analysed individually in 96-well plates by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for the presence of P. vivax VK210, P. vivax VK247, and P. falciparum sporozoites. Results were read by an ELISA reader at 415 nm after 30 min and after 60 min, and the threshold value for positive results was set at twice the value of the negative control on each plate, according to Centers for Disease Control protocol.

Malaria metric calculations

Based on the results from ELISA testing, sporozoite rates were determined for P. falciparum, P. vivax VK210, and P. vivax VK247 for each survey period, collection site and anopheline species. Hourly human biting rates for each site were calculated by dividing the number of mosquitoes caught by the number of person-hours spent collecting.

Because Anopheles darlingi composed over 98.5% of the mosquitoes collected and 97.4% of those that tested positive for sporozoites, all mosquitoes were treated as An. darlingi for the purpose of these calculations. Vectorial capacity index (VCI) and basic reproductive rate (BRR) were determined using the method outlined by Gilles [13]. VCI was calculated by multiplying the human biting rate by appropriate assumptions for bites per mosquito per night, the proportion of biting on humans (human blood index), and the expected longevity and expected infective life of the mosquitoes [13].

Biting rate per mosquito per night was set to 1/3 based on a gonotrophic cycle lasting three days for An. darlingi as observed in the Mato Grosso region of Brazil [13, 14]. The human blood index for An. darlingi was assumed to be 0.59 based on previously published data from a rural region of the Brazilian Amazon [15]. Probability of survival of An. darlingi for one day was calculated from the parous rate [16]. The average parous rate for An. darlingi was reported to be 0.619 in the Upper-Maroni forest region of French Guiana [17], giving a probability of survival for one day of 0.852. Based on an average annual temperature of 28°C for the Loreto region [1], the sporogonic periods were conservatively estimated as eight days for P. vivax and 11 days for P. falciparum based on data from various experimental studies compiled and plotted against ambient temperature by Macdonald [18]. The probability of survival through the sporogonic period was calculated to be 0.172 for P. falciparum and 0.278 for P. vivax. The expected life of female An. darlingi was calculated as the negative reciprocal of the natural logarithm of the probability of survival for one day [13], giving a value of approximately 6.25 days.

BRR was calculated by multiplying VCI by appropriate assumptions for the susceptibility of the vector species to infection as determined by membrane feeds and the infective duration of an untreated human case calculated as the reciprocal of the human recovery rate [13]. Susceptibility of An. darlingi was conservatively assumed to be 0.410 for P. falciparum based on published data for membrane-fed An. darlingi caught in Belize [19] and 0.250 for P. vivax based on published data for membrane-fed An. darlingi caught in the Brazilian Amazon [20]. These susceptibility estimates fall just below the ranges observed in human-fed An. darlingi for P. vivax and in the lower half of the ranges for P. falciparum[2124]. The recovery rate for P. vivax was assumed to be 1/9 based on factors used to mathematically model malaria transmission [25] and confirmed by data measured in a rural locality of Papua New Guinea [26]. The recovery rate for P. falciparum was assumed to be 1/200 based on case data compiled by Macdonald from several previous studies [27].

Nightly EIRs were calculated for each site by multiplying the measured sporozoite rates by the measured nightly human biting rates, and EIR values were compared across survey periods and collection sites.

Malaria surveillance in the community of Mazan

The health post in the community of Mazan provides free, unrestricted diagnostics and treatment for malaria. Records were examined daily for the periods before and during the time that this study took place. To delineate transmission patterns and predict peak and trough months, monthly P. falciparum indices were used to consider clinical disease related only to recent infection rather than relapse.

Active malaria surveillance among river travellers

Active surveillance for febrile illness and Plasmodium parasitaemia was conducted on the Mazan River during each of the three survey periods. Travellers encountered on the river in this region who gave informed consent were sampled by thick blood smear. Febrile patients were defined as symptomatic, while those lacking a fever at the time of sampling were considered to be asymptomatic. Rapid diagnostic tests (BinaxNOW Malaria Test; Binax, Inc, Scarborough, ME, USA) were performed on symptomatic individuals, and confirmed cases were treated according to standard protocols outlined by the Peruvian Ministry of Health. A total of 284 blood smears were collected, of which 188 were collected in April, 32 in July-August, and 64 in January-February.

Statistical analysis

Measured sporozoite rates and human biting rates for the five serially-visited study sites were analysed using paired, two-tailed t-tests. Statistically significant differences between trips were defined as having p<0.05.

Results

Mosquito analysis

From July 2008 to April 2009, a total of 8,364 adult female mosquitoes were captured over 1,324 total person-hours, of which 8,347 (99.8%) anopheline mosquitoes were available for morphological species identification and analysis by ELISA for the presence of P. vivax VK210, P. vivax VK247, and P. falciparum sporozoites. Mosquitoes were collected from 21 locations along the Mazan River (Table 2). Anopheles darlingi comprised the majority collected (8,246, 98.58%), while six other species were collected in smaller quantities: Anopheles oswaldoi (40, 0.48%), Anopheles mediopunctatus (25, 0.30%), Anopheles peryassui (3, 0.04%), Anopheles nuneztovari (2, 0.02%), Anopheles kompi (1, 0.01%) and Anopheles shanonni (1, 0.01%). Identifications to species of 47 (0.56%) mosquito specimens were unable to be performed due to morphological damage.
Table 2

Distribution of captured anopheline species at sites along the Mazan River in Peru

 

An. darlingi

An. mediopunctatus

An. kompi

An. nuneztovari

An. oswaldoi

An. peryassui

An. shannoni

Unidentified

Total

ACH

539

0

0

0

5

0

0

13

557

ARA

386

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

388

CAL

188

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

192

CAM

1488

1

0

0

3

0

0

10

1502

CCC

88

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

89

CCH

48

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

50

CPA

160

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

161

CPI

272

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

274

CSC

644

0

0

0

1

0

0

3

648

CTI

8

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

CUR

68

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

70

MAP

253

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

254

MAT

2588

0

0

0

1

0

0

6

2595

PCH

85

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

85

QAM1

21

4

0

0

9

0

1

1

36

QAM2

136

4

0

0

0

0

0

5

145

QAR

310

0

0

0

9

0

0

2

321

QBU

103

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

103

QPA

9

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

10

QPI

834

9

1

1

4

3

0

1

853

QSA

18

2

0

0

1

0

0

1

22

Total

8246

25

1

2

40

3

1

46

8364

(98.58)

(0.30)

(0.01)

(0.02)

(0.48)

(0.04)

(0.01)

(0.56)

In the final row, the percent of total for each species is listed in parenthesis.

Of the specimens, 117 (1.4%) tested positive for sporozoites by ELISA. Of those that tested positive, 19 (0.23%) were positive for single infections of P. falciparum, 54 (0.65%) for P. vivax VK210, and 40 (0.49%) for P. vivax VK247. Four mixed infections were also detected: two (0.02%) for P. falciparum and P. vivax VK210, and two (0.02%) for P. vivax VK210 and P. vivax VK247. All mosquitoes positive for sporozoites were An. darlingi, with the exception of one positive An. mediopunctatus and one positive unidentified Anopheles spp (Table 3). The sporozoite rates for each Plasmodium species varied by capture location and survey period (Table 4). Human biting rates also varied between locations and survey periods, from 0.102 to 41.13 bites per person per hour (Table 5). Mean hourly human biting rates were 4.27, 17.61, and 3.40 bites per person per hour for April, July-August, and January-February, respectively. Hourly data from the April survey period showed a unimodal human biting rate that peaked at 2100–2200.
Table 3

Malaria positivity and sporozoite rate by ELISA antigen, anopheline species, and survey period

 

Number of positives (sporozoite rate, %)

 

Survey period / Species

P. vivax VK210

P. vivax VK247

P. falciparum

Total number tested

April 2008:

    

An. darlingi

21 (0.521)

9 (0.223)

6 (0.149)

4034

An. mediopunctatus

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

2

An. kompi

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

An. nuneztovari

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

An. oswaldoi

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

4

An. peryassui

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

An. shannoni

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

 Unidentified

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

9

Total

21 (0.519)

9 (0.222)

6 (0.148)

4049

July-August 2008:

    

An. darlingi

0 (0.000)

1 (0.103)

1 (0.103)

967

An. mediopunctatus

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

7

An. kompi

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

An. nuneztovari

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

1

An. oswaldoi

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

16

An. peryassui

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

3

An. shannoni

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

 Unidentified

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

5

Total

0 (0.000)

1 (0.100)

1 (0.100)

999

January-February 2009:

    

An. darlingi

36 (1.116)

32 (0.992)

12 (0.372)

3227

An. mediopunctatus

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

1 (6.250)

16

An. kompi

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

1

An. nuneztovari

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

1

An. oswaldoi

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

20

An. peryassui

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0

An. shannoni

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

0 (0.000)

1

 Unidentified

1 (3.125)

0 (0.000)

1 (3.125)

32

Total

37 (1.122)

32 (0.970)

14 (0.424)

3298

Mosquitoes collected along the Mazan River were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for P. vivax VK210, P. vivax VK247, and P. falciparum. Sporozoite rates (percentage of CSP positive mosquitoes) were calculated using the resulting number of positives.

Table 4

Malaria positivity and sporozoite rate by ELISA antigen, survey period, and collection site

 

Number of positives (sporozoite rate, %)

 

April 2008

July-August 2008

January-February 2009

Site

P. vivax VK210

P. vivax VK247

P. falciparum

P. vivax VK210

P. vivax VK247

P. falciparum

P. vivax VK210

P. vivax VK247

P. falciparum

ACH

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(0.000)

(0.510)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

ARA

0

1

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(0.258)

(0.517)

CAL

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.521)

(0.521)

(0.000)

CAM

3

0

2

2

4

1

0

0

0

(1.299)

(0.000)

(0.866)

(0.158)

(0.316)

(0.079)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

CCC

0

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(1.124)

(0.000)

CCH

0

0

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

CPA

5

2

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(3.106)

(1.242)

(0.000)

CPI

0

0

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.365)

CSC

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

1

0

(0.000)

(0.154)

(0.000)

CTI

0

0

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

CUR

5

1

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

(7.143)

(1.429)

(1.429)

MAP

4

0

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1.674)

(0.000)

(0.837)

MAT

7

14

0

16

5

2

0

0

1

(1.556)

(3.111)

(0.000)

(0.846)

(0.264)

(0.106)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.397)

PCH

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1.176)

(1.176)

(0.000)

QAM1

0

2

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(5.556)

(2.778)

QAM2

1

3

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.690)

(2.069)

(0.690)

QAR

2

5

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

(0.858)

(2.146)

(0.429)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(1.316)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

QBU

6

0

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

(5.825)

(0.000)

(1.942)

QPA

1

0

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(10.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

QPI

1

0

1

3

0

2

0

0

0

(0.316)

(0.000)

(0.316)

(0.580)

(0.000)

(0.387)

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

QSA

0

0

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.000)

(0.000)

(0.000)

A dash signifies that mosquito collection was not conducted at that site during that survey period. Mixed infections are considered to be positive for both antigens.

Table 5

Hourly human-biting rates of Anopheline mosquitoes collected in 20 sites along the Mazan River

 

Hourly human biting rate

Site

April 2008

July-August 2008

January-February 2009

ACH

4.261

6.500

1.265

ARA

12.516

-

-

CAL

3.310

-

-

CAM

5.500

27.522

0.102

CCC

2.697

-

-

CCH

1.389

-

-

CPA

3.833

-

-

CPI

6.683

-

-

CSC

-

-

13.224

CTI

0.273

-

-

CUR

1.061

-

-

MAP

4.704

-

-

MAT

10.488

41.130

5.143

PCH

4.250

-

-

QAM1

0.857

-

-

QAM2

4.028

-

-

QAR

5.548

1.652

0.245

QBU

2.641

-

-

QPA

0.313

-

-

QPI

10.533

11.239

0.408

QSA

0.489

-

-

Average ± St. Dev.

4.269 ± 3.536

17.609 ± 16.356

3.398 ± 5.175

For the five serially-visited sites, statistically significant (p<0.05) differences were observed between the April and January-February surveys for overall Plasmodium sporozoite rates and human biting rates and between the July-August and January-February surveys for overall Plasmodium rates only. No statistically significant differences were observed for sporozoite rates or human biting rates between the April and July-August surveys.

Vectorial capacity index (VCI) and basic reproductive rate (BRR)

The VCI and BRR were calculated for each of the collection sites (Table 6). VCI values ranged from 0.035 to 14.080 for P. vivax and from 0.022 to 8.715 for P. falciparum. Mean VCI values for P. vivax were 1.461, 6.028, and 1.163 for April, July-August, and January-February (respectively), and 0.905, 3.731, and 0.720 for P. falciparum. As a measure of malaria transmission potential, for P. vivax 12 out of 20 (60%) sites in April, four out of five (80%) sites in July-August, and two out of six (33.3%) sites in January-February had VCI values greater than one, indicating vectorial conditions sufficient for sustained transmission. For P. falciparum, six out of 20 (30%) sites had VCI values greater than one in April, four out of five (80%) sites in July-August, and two out of six (33.3%) sites in January-February.
Table 6

Vectorial capacity index and basic reproductive rate for P. vivax and P. falciparum

 

Vectorial capacity index (Basic reproduction rate)

 

April 2008

July-August 2008

January-February 2009

Site

P. vivax

P. falciparum

P. vivax

P. falciparum

P. vivax

P. falciparum

ACH

1.459

0.903

2.225

1.377

0.433

0.268

(3.282)

(74.035)

(5.006)

(112.942)

(0.975)

(21.985)

ARA

4.285

2.625

-

-

-

-

(9.640)

(217.476)

CAL

1.133

0.701

-

-

-

-

(2.550)

(57.519)

CAM

1.883

1.165

9.421

5.832

0.035

0.022

(4.236)

(95.566)

(21.198)

(478.207)

(0.079)

(1.773)

CCC

0.923

0.571

-

-

-

-

(2.077)

(46.862)

CCH

0.475

0.294

-

-

-

-

(1.070)

(24.133)

CPA

1.312

0.812

-

-

-

-

(2.953)

(66.607)

CPI

2.288

1.416

-

-

-

-

(5.147)

(116.120)

CSC

-

-

-

-

4.527

2.802

(10.186)

(229.784)

CTI

0.093

0.058

-

-

-

-

(0.210)

(4.739)

CUR

0.363

0.225

-

-

-

-

(0.817)

(18.429)

MAP

1.610

0.997

-

-

-

-

(3.623)

(81.730)

MAT

3.590

2.222

14.080

8.715

1.761

1.090

(8.078)

(182.242)

(31.680)

(714.667)

(3.961)

(89.360)

PCH

1.455

0.901

-

-

-

-

(3.273)

(73.846)

QAM1

0.293

0.182

-

-

-

-

(0.660)

(14.893)

QAM2

1.379

0.853

-

-

-

-

(3.102)

(69.985)

QAR

1.899

1.176

0.566

0.350

0.084

0.052

(4.273)

(96.393)

(1.273)

(28.708)

(0.189)

(4.255)

QBU

0.904

0.560

-

-

-

-

(2.034)

(45.889)

QPA

0.107

0.066

-

-

-

-

(0.241)

(5.430)

QPI

3.606

2.232

3.847

0.140

0.201

0.086

(8.113)

(183.023)

(8.657)

(195.287)

(0.314)

(7.092)

QSA

0.167

0.104

-

-

-

-

(0.377)

(8.495)

P. vivax here includes both the VK210 and VK247 antigens. A dash signifies that mosquito collection was not conducted at that site during that survey period.

Calculation of mean BRR values for P. vivax across all collection sites indicated 3.3, 13.6, and 2.6 secondary anopheline infections for each individual infected mosquito for April, July-August, and January-February (respectively). For P. falciparum, the mean BRR values for the three survey periods were 74.2, 306.0, and 59.0.

Entomological inoculation rate (EIR)

Nightly EIRs were calculated for P. vivax and P. falciparum for each collection site and survey period (Table 7). Plasmodium vivax generally had higher nightly inoculation rates than P. falciparum, and, comparing individual sites across survey periods, the highest inoculation rates were generally observed in April, followed by July-August and January-February, though EIR values for the July-August survey exceeded those for the April survey in several instances. Average EIR values across all collection sites were 0.86, 0.91, and 0.02 infective bites per person per night for P. vivax and 0.19, 0.19, and 0.02 infective bites per person per night for P. falciparum in April, July-August, and January-February (respectively). Together, these give cumulative average inoculation rates of 1.04, 1.07, and 0.05 infective bites per person per night.
Table 7

Nightly entomological inoculation rates by Plasmodium species, survey period, and collection site

 

Nightly entomological inoculation rate

 

April 2008

July-August 2008

January-February 2009

Site

PV

PF

Overall

PV

PF

Overall

PV

PF

Overall

ACH

0.174

0.000

0.174

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

ARA

0.388

0.776

1.164

-

-

-

-

-

-

CAL

0.345

0.000

0.345

-

-

-

-

-

-

CAM

0.429

0.286

0.571

0.914

0.152

1.066

0.000

0.000

0.000

CCC

0.364

0.000

0.364

-

-

-

-

-

-

CCH

0.000

0.000

0.000

-

-

-

-

-

-

CPA

2.000

0.000

2.000

-

-

-

-

-

-

CPI

0.000

0.293

0.293

-

-

-

-

-

-

CSC

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.143

0.000

0.143

CTI

0.000

0.000

0.000

-

-

-

-

-

-

CUR

1.091

0.182

1.273

-

-

-

-

-

-

MAP

0.787

0.394

1.181

-

-

-

-

-

-

MAT

5.314

0.000

5.314

3.196

0.304

3.500

0.000

0.143

0.143

PCH

0.700

0.000

0.700

-

-

-

-

-

-

QAM1

0.571

0.286

0.857

-

-

-

-

-

-

QAM2

1.333

0.333

1.667

-

-

-

-

-

-

QAR

1.333

0.190

1.524

0.000

0.174

0.174

0.000

0.000

0.000

QBU

1.846

0.615

2.462

-

-

-

-

-

-

QPA

0.125

0.000

0.125

-

-

-

-

-

-

QPI

0.400

0.400

0.800

0.457

0.304

0.609

0.000

0.000

0.000

QSA

0.000

0.000

0.000

-

-

-

-

-

-

EIRs were calculated for P. vivax (PV), P. falciparum (PF), and total Plasmodium (overall). P. vivax here includes both VK210 and VK247. A dash signifies that mosquito collection was not conducted at that site during that survey period.

Of the mosquito collection sites, 17 out of 20 (85%) in April, four out of five (80%) in July-August, and two out of six (33.3%) in January-February had non-zero cumulative nightly inoculation rates. In April, eight sites had cumulative EIR values greater than one infective bite per person per night: Mapa Tipischa (MAT), Quebrada Bufeo (QBU), Cocha Paña (CPA), Punisique (QAM2), Quebrada Armas (QAR), Copal Urco (CUR), Campamento Mapillo (MAP) and Arahuana (ARA). Unprotected temporary inhabitants in these areas during the collection period would have received 5.3, 2.5, 2.0, 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.2 infective bites each night, respectively.

Malaria surveillance among river travellers

Analysis of thick blood smears collected from Mazan River travellers showed 17 positives of 284 total samples (5.99%). Broken down by survey period, 14 of 188 (7.45%) patients were positive in April, two out of 32 (6.25%) in July-August, and one out of 64 (1.56%) in January-February. Overall, only two out of 17 (11.76%) of those that tested positive for malaria were symptomatic, while the remaining 15 (88.24%) were asymptomatic at the time of sampling.

Discussion

In this study, a remarkably high level of malaria transmission is demonstrated in a region previously characterized as hypo-endemic where village-based entomological studies have suggested very low EIRs. In contrast to such previous findings, EIRs comparable to those seen in holo-endemic regions of Africa have been observed in remote riverine sites tens to hundreds of kilometres away from larger human settlements, revealing a new level of heterogeneity of malaria transmission within the Peruvian Amazon. Furthermore, the existence of high rates of Plasmodium-infected An. darlingi in remote areas of human occupation suggests that anthropophilic mosquitoes with high vectorial capacity might be selected for, leading to asymptomatic, patent parasitaemia to maintain the malaria life cycle.

As a direct indicator of malaria risk for individuals temporarily residing in or travelling through this zone, EIR values were calculated for each of the campsites surveyed. Three previous studies also published EIR values for the peri-Iquitos region [2830]. In an investigation of the effects of deforestation on vector biting rates in communities near to the road connecting Iquitos and Nauta, Vittor and colleagues found EIRs markedly lower than those found in this study with values ranging from 0.1 to 38 infective bites per person per year [28]. Another similar estimate of 10 to 20 infective bites per person per year, published by Roshanravan, was based on extrapolation of unpublished data [29]. A third study conducted by Reinbold-Wasson and colleagues surveyed several stably-inhabited sites along or nearby the Iquitos-Nauta highway, finding EIRs ranging from 0 to 60 infective bites per person per month during a period of historically high transmission (1996–7) [30]. As the only major estimates that had been published for the region, these values have been cited as an indication of malaria risk in the Peruvian Amazon.

Compared to the results of this study, however, it seems that these previously published values do not provide an accurate assessment of malaria transmission risk, markedly underestimating the true malaria burden in the peri-Iquitos region. This is likely due to the highly heterogeneous microgeographical nature of malaria. Though the sites examined by Vittor and her colleagues were located in a peri-urban area outside of Iquitos, these sites were selected due to varying levels of deforestation and not as areas of intense malaria transmission [28]. Similarly, Reinbold-Wasson and his colleagues surveyed sites along or nearby the Iquitos-Nauta road, unlike the undeveloped, transiently-populated camps surveyed here [30]. Correspondingly, the human biting rates found by Vittor and Reinbold-Wasson were much lower than the majority of those found in this study [28, 30]. Furthermore, the EIR values published by Vittor and Roshanravan were based on estimated sporozoite rates of 0.5% rather than measured values found by mosquito capture and ELISA analysis, as have been conducted here [28, 29]. Considering each survey period and site individually, nearly two-thirds of the localities surveyed in this study had sporozoite rates greater than this estimated value, reaching as high as 10.0%. This study provides the first assessment of malaria transmission risk and EIR in peri-urban hot zones in the Iquitos region based on direct measurement of sporozoite rates and hourly human biting rates, and the results are strikingly high compared to previous reports derived mostly from areas where sampling is more convenient from the population centre of Iquitos.

Several other studies have also investigated vector distribution and malaria transmission potential in Peru and other regions of the Amazon and can provide context for the results of this study. Compared to previously reported values for An. darlingi in the Loreto, Madre de Dios, San Martin, and Ucayali regions of Peru, sporozoite rates in the localities surveyed here were found to be 10- to 100-fold greater [31]. Human biting rates reported in Santa Clara, a community located outside of Iquitos, and in several localities in the region of Madre de Dios were substantially lower than the values reported for the top one-fifth to one-half of the sites surveyed here with the exception of one site in Madre de Dios that had values similar to the highest human biting rates reported in this study [32, 33]. Notably, An. darlingi represented a much smaller proportion of the mosquitoes collected in each of these studies, exceeding 50% in only a minority of the localities they surveyed [3133].

In general, the sites examined in this study were also among the highest in the Amazon in terms of malaria risk expressed as EIR. In the Brazilian Amazon, EIR values for An. darlingi have been reported at levels similar to those observed in this study; however, several of the sites surveyed here had EIR values up to twice as high as the greatest Brazilian values [34]. Such sites also had human biting rates and sporozoite rates that aligned with the top of the ranges that have been reported in Brazil [15, 3436]. As was observed in Peru, the species diversity in Brazil was different than that seen in this study, with An. darlingi comprising less than 50% of the mosquitoes collected in the majority of the localities surveyed in Brazil [15, 34, 36], which may suggest significant environmental differences. Studies from the Sifontes region of the Venezuelan Amazon and the Upper-Maroni Amazon region of French Guiana also report EIR values that are generally much lower than those reported in this study, while comparisons of human biting rates and sporozoite rates with these results vary by survey period [17, 37]. In the Sifontes region of Venezuela, active vector control efforts at the time of collection were noted and mosquito collections were conducted indoors rather than outdoors, which may help account for the lower EIR values [37].

The study reporting results most similar to those reported here was conducted in the Ocamo region in southern Venezuela [38]. Mean cumulative EIR values in this region were comparatively higher than the averages observed in this study in January-February, but generally lower than those observed in April and July-August [38]. The same pattern can be seen for sporozoite rates and human biting rates [38]. Though the sites in Ocamo had permanent residents, these similarities may be related to other similarities in study sites, including the lack of insecticide-based vector control for 1–2 years prior to the study in Ocamo, the riverine location, and the high proportion of An. darlingi, which suggests ecological similarities [38].

In a broader sense, this study underlines the marked spatial heterogeneity of malaria transmission risk in the Peruvian Amazon. The importance of spatial heterogeneity of infection has been previously investigated in Peru and Brazil on a small scale within homes and between neighbouring homes, within gold mining areas, and within communities [3, 8, 39]. In the areas examined in these previous studies, at-risk zones were identified where risk of transmission for P. falciparum or P. vivax was significantly higher than in other zones of the areas surveyed [3, 8]. Here, the existence of similar clusters of high transmission has been identified, but the spatial scale has been enlarged and the differences in transmission are much more pronounced. Of the 21 sites surveyed, nine sites had nightly EIR values greater than one infective bite per person per night during at least one of the survey periods, and the peak EIR value reached as high as 5.3 infective bites per person per night.

The results of this study also showed temporal heterogeneity in EIR and sporozoite rates across survey periods. In four out of the five serially-visited sites, the highest cumulative EIR values were observed in April and progressively declined for July-August and January-February. Only two of the six sites surveyed in January-February showed the presence of infective bites, and of those two neither showed an EIR value greater than 0.15 infective bites per person per night. A similar general trend can be seen for sporozoite rates, suggesting that malaria transmission in these hot zones, while intense, remains seasonally unstable.

Despite this instability, however, a large majority of the sites surveyed showed transmission potential, including several of those where malaria sporozoites were not found during one or more of the survey periods. In previous studies, mosquito behaviour has been regarded as a key determinant of malaria clustering [3, 8]. In the Peruvian Amazon, An. darlingi has been identified as the most important regional vector, and its establishment in Loreto has been linked to the re-emergence and rapid growth of malaria in the peri-Iquitos region [1, 15]. In this study, a dominant presence of An. darlingi was observed in every collection site across all three survey periods, including those where Plasmodium sporozoites were not detected. VCI values were found to be greater than one for P. falciparum or P. vivax in a significant portion of individual sites, indicating a strong potential for vector-based transmission. Moreover, although only one of the serially-visited sites showed VCI values greater than one for all three survey periods, several of the sites showing the highest trip-specific VCI values were not serially-visited. Together this data suggests that at least several of the sites surveyed in this study may be able to support stable malaria transmission for a large portion of the year, and, similarly, that the risk of developing intense transmission upon introduction of infective human hosts may exist in several of the sites where sporozoites were not detected during this study.

It is also important to consider the mechanisms sustaining transmission in these zones, which lack permanent human inhabitants. The greatest reported flight distance for An. darlingi is 7.2 km [40], making mosquito vector travel between sites unlikely. In a recent study, Wesolowski and her colleagues traced the distribution of malaria parasites through human movement, identifying various zones as “emitters” or “receivers” of malaria based on an evaluation of human travel networks [9]. It seems probable that frequent human travel for occupational purposes plays a major role in the establishment and maintenance of transmission in the sites surveyed in this study. Previous research has implicated the presence of asymptomatic malaria in maintaining malaria transmission in the Peruvian Amazon [3]. In this study, an overall rate of asymptomatic malaria of 5.28% was found amongst Mazan River travellers encountered in the region of the study sites. Although it is unclear whether these cases were contracted before or during travel in this region, the prevalence of parasitaemia, and particularly asymptomatic parasitaemia, is two- to three-fold greater than that seen in the community of Mazan, indicating that transmission is accelerated upriver.

Consideration of human travel also reveals the risk posed by zones of hyperendemicity, such as those considered in this study, for populated communities in the peri-Iquitos region. Labourers staying at the sites surveyed rarely employ malaria prevention measures (eg insect repellent or treated bed nets), and the sites themselves are undeveloped and have not been subject to vector control measures. Between June 2006 and July 2008, 2,697 malaria cases were detected in the community of Mazan. Considering these factors and the frequency of occupational travel, it seems likely that at least some of these cases were contracted in hot spot sites and carried back to travellers’ home communities. Previous research has shown that family members and neighbours living in the immediate vicinity of a human case are at higher risk for malaria exposure [3]. In this manner, human-related malaria importation enables intense hot zone transmission to affect more than just those who physically visit these sites by increasing disease risk for potentially large numbers of non-travelling inhabitants as well, likely helping to sustain malaria transmission in Mazan and other communities near Iquitos.

Ultimately, additional research is required to more precisely assess the impact of human travel between areas of hyperendemic transmission and populated communities. These hot spots correspond with sites that are frequented by labourers and travellers, providing challenges for disease control efforts in the surrounding communities to which exposed travellers return. Because of this, effective malaria control activities in the Peruvian Amazon should not only consider communities where malaria is present, but must also increase the preferential focusing of resources on populations frequenting areas of concentrated transmission and human travel. Doing so should reduce transmission in current hyperendemic zones, diminish the creation of confluence of transmission areas, and improve malaria control at the regional level.

Conclusions

This study presents measures of vectorial capacity and indices of malaria transmission risk based on direct measurement of anopheline biting rates and sporozoite rates for several undeveloped, riverine campsites in the Peruvian Amazon, frequented by occupation-related travellers. The results shown here are significantly higher than those that have been previously published for the peri-Iquitos region, surpassing nearly all other published measures in the South American Amazon and reaching as high as values found in holo-endemic areas of Africa, while also exhibiting significant heterogeneity between collection sites and over time. These results further implicate human travellers as a potentially major and highly-mobile disease reservoir in the region, identifying a local target population involved in sporozoite movement and suggesting important considerations for malaria control efforts in populated communities to which malaria-carrying travellers return.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was principally supported by a faculty pilot grant from the Johns Hopkins Molecular Microbiology and Immunology Center to MK. Additional funding was contributed by the Military Infectious Disease Research Program Project GLI0015_06_RC to DF.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
(2)
Asociación Benéfica Prisma
(3)
US Naval Medical Research Center Unit-6
(4)
US Naval Medical Research Center Unit-6
(5)
Ministry of Health
(6)
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University
(7)
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego

References

  1. Aramburu Guarda J, Ramal Asayag C, Witzig R: Malaria reemergence in the Peruvian Amazon region. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999, 5: 209-215. 10.3201/eid0502.9902.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ministerio de Salud del Perú: The Economic Impact of Malaria in Peru. 2000, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  3. Branch OL, Casapia WM, Gamboa DV, Hernandez JN, Alava FF, Roncal N, Alvarez E, Perez EJ, Gotuzzo E: Clustered local transmission and asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria infections in a recently emerged, hypoendemic Peruvian Amazon community. Malar J. 2005, 4: 27-10.1186/1475-2875-4-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ministerio de Salud del Perú: Análisis de la Situación de Salud del Perú. 2010, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  5. Pan American Health Organization: Report on the Situation of Malaria in the Americas, 2008. 2010, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Ministerio de Salud del Perú: Sala de Situación de Salud: Semana Epidemiológica N° 52–2012. 2012Google Scholar
  7. Ministerio de Salud, Dirección Regional de Salud Loreto: Análisis de la Situación de Salud de la Región Loreto Año 2007. 2008, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  8. Bautista CT, Chan AST, Ryan JR, Calampa C, Roper MH, Hightower AW, Magill AJ: Epidemiology and spatial analysis of malaria in the Northern Peruvian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 1216-1222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wesolowski A, Eagle N, Tatem AJ, Smith DL, Noor AM, Snow RW, Buckee CO: Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria. Science. 2012, 338: 267-270. 10.1126/science.1223467.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Faran ME, Linthicum KJ: A handbook of the Amazonian species of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Syst. 1981, 13: 1-81.Google Scholar
  11. Consoli RAG, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R: Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil. 1994, Ed. Fiocruz: Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  12. Wirtz R, Avery M, Benedict M: Plasmodium sporozoite ELISA. Methods in Anopheles Research Manual. 2007, Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center. MR4,http://www.mr4.org/MethodsinAnophelesResearch.aspx,Google Scholar
  13. Gilles HM: Epidemiology of malaria. Bruce-Chwatt’s Essential Malariology. Edited by: Gilles HM, Warrell DA. 1993, London: Arnold, 124-163. 3Google Scholar
  14. Charlwood JD, Wilkes TJ: Studies on the age-composition of samples of Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae) in Brazil. Bull Entomol Res. 1979, 69: 337-10.1017/S0007485300017818.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tadei WP, Dutary Thatcher B: Malaria vectors in the Brazilian Amazon: Anopheles of the subgenus Nyssorhynchus. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2000, 42: 87-94. 10.1590/S0036-46652000000200005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson G: Estimation of the survival rate of anopheline mosquitoes in nature. Nature. 1954, 174: 792-793. 10.1038/174792a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Girod R, Gaborit P, Carinci R, Issaly J, Fouque F: Anopheles darlingi bionomics and transmission of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae in Amerindian villages of the Upper-Maroni Amazonian forest, French Guiana. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008, 103: 702-710. 10.1590/S0074-02762008000700013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Macdonald G: The analysis of the sporozoite rate. Trop Dis Bull. 1952, 49: 569-586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grieco JP, Achee NL, Roberts DR, Andre RG: Comparative susceptibility of three species of Anopheles from Belize, Central America, to Plasmodium falciparum (NF-54). J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005, 21: 279-290. 10.2987/8756-971X(2005)21[279:CSOTSO]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Marrelli MT, Honorio NA, Flores-Mendoza C, Lourenco-de-Oliveira R, Marinotti O, Kloetzel JK: Comparative susceptibility of two members of the Anopheles oswaldoi complex, An. oswaldoi and An. konderi, to infection by Plasmodium vivax. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93: 381-384. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90123-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein TA, Lima JB, Tada MS, Miller R: Comparative susceptibility of anopheline mosquitoes in Rondonia, Brazil to infection by Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 45: 463-470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein TA, Lima JB, Tada MS: Comparative susceptibility of anopheline mosquitoes to Plasmodium falciparum in Rondonia, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 44: 598-603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein TA, Tada MS, Lima JB, Katsuragawa TH: Infection of Anopheles darlingi fed on patients infected with Plasmodium vivax before and during treatment with chloroquine in Costa Marques, Rondonia, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 45: 471-478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Klein TA, Tada MS, Lima JB: Infection of Anopheles darlingi fed on patients with Plasmodium falciparum before and after treatment with quinine or quinine plus tetracycline. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 44: 604-608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kammanee A, Kanyamee N, Tang IM: Basic reproduction number for the transmission of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001, 32: 702-706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bruce M, Donnelly C, Packer M, Lagog M, Gibson N, Narara A, Walliker D, Alpers M, Day K: Age-and species-specific duration of infection in asymptomatic malaria infections in Papua New Guinea. Parasitology. 2000, 121: 247-256. 10.1017/S0031182099006344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Macdonald G, Goeckel GW: The malaria parasite rate and interruption of transmission. Bull World Health Organ. 1964, 31: 365-377.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vittor AY, Gilman RH, Tielsch J, Glass G, Shields T, Lozano WS, Pinedo-Cancino V, Patz JA: The effect of deforestation on the human-biting rate of Anopheles darlingi, the primary vector of Falciparum malaria in the Peruvian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 3-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Roshanravan B, Kari E, Gilman RH, Cabrera L, Lee E, Metcalfe J, Calderon M, Lescano AG, Montenegro SH, Calampa C: Endemic malaria in the Peruvian Amazon region of Iquitos. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 69: 45-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Reinbold-Wasson DD, Sardelis MR, Jones JW, Watts DM, Fernandez R, Carbajal F, Pecor JE, Calampa C, Klein TA, Turell MJ: Determinants of Anopheles seasonal distribution patterns across a forest to periurban gradient near Iquitos, Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012, 86: 459-463. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0547.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Flores-Mendoza C, Fernandez R, Escobedo-Vargas KS, Vela-Perez Q, Schoeler GB: Natural Plasmodium infections in Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles benarrochi (Diptera: Culicidae) from eastern Peru. J Med Entomol. 2004, 41: 489-494. 10.1603/0022-2585-41.3.489.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. León W, Valle J, Naupay R: Comportamiento estacional del Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi Root 1926 en localidades de Loreto y Madre de Díos, Perú 1999–2000. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2003, 20: 22-27.Google Scholar
  33. Tineo E, Medina A, Fallaque C: Distribución geográfica y comportamiento estacional de la picadura del Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi Root 1926 en localidades de la frontera Perú-Bolivia, Madre de Dios, Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2003, 20: 78-83.Google Scholar
  34. Galardo AK, Arruda M, D'AlmeidaCouto AA, Wirtz R, Lounibos LP, Zimmerman RH: Malaria vector incrimination in three rural riverine villages in the Brazilian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 461-469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Teva A, Deane L, Daniel-Ribeiro C: Natural malaria infections in anophelines in Rondonia State, Brazilian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990, 43: 6-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Martins-Campos KM, Pinheiro WD, Vítor-Silva S, Siqueira AM, Melo GC, Rodrigues ÍC, Fé NF, Barbosa GV, Tadei WP, Guinovart C: Integrated vector management targeting Anopheles darlingi populations decreases malaria incidence in an unstable transmission area, in the rural Brazilian Amazon. Malar J. 2012, 11: 351-10.1186/1475-2875-11-351.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moreno JE, Rubio-Palis Y, Paez E, Perez E, Sanchez V, Vaccari E: Malaria entomological inoculation rates in gold mining areas of Southern Venezuela. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 764-768. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000500017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Magris M, Rubio-Palis Y, Menares C, Villegas L: Vector bionomics and malaria transmission in the Upper Orinoco River, Southern Venezuela. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007, 102: 303-311. 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Barbieri AF, Sawyer DO: Heterogeneity of malaria prevalence in alluvial gold mining areas in Northern Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2007, 23: 2878-2886. 10.1590/S0102-311X2007001200009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Charlwood JD, Alecrim WA: Capture-recapture studies with the South American malaria vector Anopheles darlingi, Root. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1989, 83: 569-576.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Parker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement