Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Characterizing the effect of temperature fluctuation on the incidence of malaria: an epidemiological study in south-west China using the varying coefficient distributed lag non-linear model

Malaria Journal201413:192

  • Received: 9 March 2014
  • Accepted: 20 May 2014
  • Published:



Malaria transmission is strongly determined by the environmental temperature and the environment is rarely constant. Therefore, mosquitoes and parasites are not only exposed to the mean temperature, but also to daily temperature variation. Recently, both theoretical and laboratory work has shown, in addition to mean temperatures, daily fluctuations in temperature can affect essential mosquito and parasite traits that determine malaria transmission intensity. However, so far there is no epidemiological evidence at the population level to this problem.


Thirty counties in southwest China were selected, and corresponding weekly malaria cases and weekly meteorological variables were collected from 2004 to 2009. Particularly, maximum, mean and minimum temperatures were collected. The daily temperature fluctuation was measured by the diurnal temperature range (DTR), the difference between the maximum and minimum temperature. The distributed lag non-linear model (MDLNM) was used to study the correlation between weekly malaria incidences and weekly mean temperatures, and the correlation pattern was allowed to vary over different levels of daily temperature fluctuations.


The overall non-linear patterns for mean temperatures are distinct across different levels of DTR. When under cooler temperature conditions, the larger mean temperature effect on malaria incidences is found in the groups of higher DTR, suggesting that large daily temperature fluctuations act to speed up the malaria incidence in cooler environmental conditions. In contrast, high daily fluctuations under warmer conditions will lead to slow down the mean temperature effect. Furthermore, in the group of highest DTR, 24-25°C or 21-23°C are detected as the optimal temperature for the malaria transmission.


The environment is rarely constant, and the result highlights the need to consider temperature fluctuations as well as mean temperatures, when trying to understand or predict malaria transmission. This work may be the first epidemiological study confirming that the effect of the mean temperature depends on temperature fluctuations, resulting in relevant evidence at the population level.


  • Malaria
  • Malaria Transmission
  • Temperature Fluctuation
  • Malaria Case
  • Malaria Incidence


Climate plays a crucial role in the dynamics and distribution of malaria [1, 2]. From the biological perspective, climate is intrinsically linked to malaria incidence through its effects on both the mosquito vector and the development of the malaria parasite inside the mosquito vector [3]. Although rainfall and relative humidity can help provide fitting habitats for mosquitoes to breed, temperature can determine not only the mosquito's development and biting rate, but also the development speed and survival of the parasites within the mosquito [4].

Currently, most epidemiological research studying the relationship between temperature and malaria is based solely on mean temperatures, such as mean monthly temperatures. However, recent theoretical work [57] and laboratory empirical study [8] demonstrated that in addition to the mean temperature, the temperature variation that occurs throughout the day also affects several aspects of the transmission. The laboratory empirical study [8] shows that daily temperature fluctuations influence the parasite infection, the rate of parasite development, mosquito biology, and ultimately determine the transmission process. Similar results were also found for dengue [9, 10]. These studies demonstrated that daily temperature fluctuation around the cooler temperatures acts to speed up the rate process, whereas the fluctuation around high mean temperatures acts to slow down processes. However, all above results were derived either through theoretical thermodynamic models using only temperature data, or from laboratory empirical study. There is no epidemiological study at the population level to examine whether the association between the mean temperatures and malaria incidence does depend on the daily temperature fluctuation. It is worth investigating this problem at the population level.

When modelling the climatic effect on malaria cases, special attention is required for two problems, non-linear and lagged patterns. On the one hand, the single fixed lag assumption was not plausible for describing population level associations [11, 12]. Biologically speaking, there are several periods to be considered for the lag effect, such as the time for mosquitoes to develop, the development period of parasites within the mosquito, and the incubation period of parasites within human body. Climatic factors will influence most of the stages. For example, higher temperatures may reduce the time for larval development, and larvae may react with different intensities to temperatures. Consequently, the association between climatic factors and malaria cases shall show a variation in terms of the time lag, resulting in a smoothly varied lag distribution at population level. On the other hand, the non-linear effect was recognized in temperatures, and substantial existing studies validated the non-linear correlation between temperatures and malaria in terms of laboratory and epidemiological studies [2, 1316]. Similar potential non-linear correlations were also proposed to rainfall [15, 17, 18]. As a result, those two patterns should be taken into account in the regression model. Distributed lag non-linear model provides a useful approach for this problem [19].

The goal of the current paper is using both temperature and malaria incidence data to study whether the association between the mean temperatures and malaria incidence does depend on the diurnal temperature range (DTR). No epidemiological study regarding this problem was reported before. Specifically, a distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) was used to study the correlation between weekly mean temperatures and weekly malaria incidences using data from 2004 to 2009 in 30 counties in southwest China. In addition, the correlation pattern was allowed to vary depending on the weekly mean DTR. The result can help understanding of the association between temperatures and malaria transmission, testing the biological hypothesis in terms of epidemiological level.


Study sites

Malaria remains a significant public health issue in the southern part of mainland China. Particularly, Yunnan Province used to be the highest endemic province [20]. For southwest China, the majority of previous studies focused on spatiotemporal pattern for mortality or morbidity [2123], or pathogenic classifications of reported cases [24]. Southwest China (21°14′to 34°31′N, 97°35′to 110°19′E) consists of four provinces, Sichuan, Chongqing, Yunnan, and Guizhou. The area has a population of 189,977,077 (sixth national census in 2010) and encompasses 1,137,570 sq km. There are 483 counties (county-level cities and districts). Thirty counties were selected as the study sites based on availability of malaria and meteorological data. The malaria data covered the 483 counties while only 131 counties had the daily meteorological record; a detailed description of these datasets is in the next section. The set of counties with both malaria and meteorological data were sorted by the average annual incidences, and the top 30 counties were included in the analysis. See Additional file 1 for a map of the 483 counties in southwest China and the selected 30 counties.

Data description

Meteorological data were collected from the publicly available Chinese Meteorological Data Sharing Service System [25]. This system was constructed by Chinese National Meteorological Information Centre. There are 836 meteorological monitoring stations with the daily record in the whole of China, 131 in the southwest. Roughly speaking, three to four counties (438/131) share one monitoring station to monitor the daily meteorological information, and no county has two monitoring stations. No information indicates that some stations have better data than others, and they are national level stations, hence they should have similar data qualities. The monitoring station should suffice to represent where the county is, an assumption usually made in existing studies [16, 22, 2629]. Those monitoring stations located in counties with malaria prevalence and corresponding counties were used.

Five kinds of daily meteorological data, from July 2003 to December 2009, were obtained for the 30 selected counties. They are maximum, mean and minimum temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity. Temperatures and rainfall variables are in °C and mm, respectively. The daily temperature fluctuation is measured by the DTR, which was calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum temperature on each day. Weekly mean values were calculated by averaging the corresponding daily values over each week. The proportion of missing meteorological data is very low. The highest missing proportion occurred to the maximum temperature with missing rate less than 0.001. The missing data were imputed by the mean value of the two closest non-missing values from the same monitoring station.

Weekly malaria cases in the 30 counties were obtained from 2004 to 2009 from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC). At county level, it is not unreasonable to assume that malaria heterogeneity is not great, a usual assumption from existing studies [23, 30, 31]. Moreover, since the interest is on the effect of temperature variables, the heterogeneity caused by other factors should not affect the result, unless other factors are related to the temperature variable. The malaria data collection were facilitated by the Chinese Information System for Infectious Diseases Control and Prevention (CISIDCP). CISIDCP was established on the basis of individual cases and public health emergencies. A virtual private network (VPN) was constructed, and information on individual cases is directly reported to the national database through the internet. This system covers all health data sources and reports new malaria cases to CCDC within 24 hours [32]. Although malaria cases observed in the 30 counties included Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum, most data did not separate different parasites. Population data for every county from 2004 to 2009 were retrieved from the National Bureau of Statistics of China.

Basic distributed lag non-linear model

DLNM represent a modelling framework to describe simultaneously non-linear and delayed dependencies [19]. As mentioned in Background, the motivation for the lag effect is the realization that temperatures can affect not merely cases occurring on one week, but on several subsequent weeks. Therefore, the converse is also true: cases of this week will depend on temperatures of many weeks before, and the final contribution of temperatures is the cumulative effect of preceding weeks. Similar interpretations also apply to other climatic variables. As with ordinary count data, Poisson regression was used to model the association between the expected number of cases E(Y it ) in week t in county i and the meteorological factors in the previous weeks,
log ( E Y it ) = log ( d it ) + β i 0 + l = 3 10 f x i t l , T m , β T m l + l = 4 15 f x i t l , r , β rl + l = 4 15 f x i t l , h , β hl ,

Here, d it is the population in county i in week t; βi 0 is the intercept effect for county i. The climatic variables for county i in week t are x it , T m , xit,r and xit,h, denoting the weekly mean temperature, the weekly rainfall and the weekly mean relative humidity, respectively.

Biological considerations suggest the lag ranges for meteorological factors. As mentioned, Model (1) accounts for the cumulative contributions from the time interval specified by the lag range, instead of assuming a single fixed lag time. Those lag ranges were chosen mainly according to [11], which gave both the biological reasoning and the empirical study. For example, at 16°C the larval development may take 47 days, and the sporogonic cycle may take 111 days. Besides, there are ten to 16 days for the incubation period in human. See [11] for the full reasoning. Eventually, three to ten weeks were used for the weekly mean temperature, while four to 15 weeks were used for the weekly rainfall and the weekly mean relative humidity [11, 18, 33].

In addition to the lag ranges, Model (1) involves two basis functions for the non-linear and lag effects, respectively. Take the mean temperature for example, one function is f x i t l , T m , β T m l , which is the non-linear effect of the mean temperature l weeks before. Many functional forms can be chosen for f(xi(t − l),r, β rl ), such as the polynomial function. The other function is to constrain the parameter β T m l . Since there is a substantial correlation between mean temperatures on weeks close together, the above regression will have a high degree of collinearity, which will result in unstable estimates of the individual β T m l ' s . To gain more efficiency and more insight into the distributed effect of mean temperature over time, it is useful to constrain the β T m l ' s . If this is done flexibly, substantial gains in reducing the noise of the unconstrained distributed lag model can be obtained, with minimal bias [12].

The second-order natural cubic spline was used for both the non-linear and lag effects of meteorological variables. This choice was partly due to the prior knowledge of the unimodal pattern for meteorological variables [15, 17, 34], and partly due to the requirement of parsimony.

Finally, correlations within one county would be greater over those between counties due to some unmeasured (or perhaps unmeasurable) county-specific covariates, and therefore βi 0 took a multilevel structure random intercept, which was a normal distribution with a mean of β0 and a variance of σ 0 2 . β0 is the average intercept over all counties, and σ 0 2 characterizes the variation of county-specific intercepts around the average intercept.
β i 0 ~ N β 0 , σ 0 2 ,

In a previous study [35], instead of mean temperatures, maximum and minimum temperatures were included in Model (1) to examine the lagged pattern between malaria cases and meteorological factors.

Varying coefficient distributed lag non-linear model

The temperature fluctuation was not included in Model (1), or implicitly, the model assumes the mean temperature has the same effect over different level of temperature fluctuations. However, the pattern of mean temperatures may depend on the temperature fluctuation. To relax this assumption, a varying coefficient model [36] was applied to examine whether the effect of mean temperature depends on the temperature fluctuation.

The functional form for the lag pattern is over the entire three to ten weeks for the mean temperature, indicating that any variation during three to ten weeks before would influence the whole functional form. Let xit,f denote the average DTR over the three to ten weeks before week t, and therefore xit,f should, to some extent, determine the lag non-linear pattern, provided the pattern of mean temperature does depend on the temperature fluctuation.

To examine the possible DTR influence, first all xit,f were approximately equally divided into four quantile groups, using their 25, 50 and 75% percentiles. The four groups were defined as groups 0–3 respectively, and following dummy variables were created to indicate the group membership,
T it , fg = 1 if x it , f is in level g 0 otherwise
Specifically, Tit,f 0 = 1 represents the xit,f is at the first DTR level, also the lowest level, and Tit,f 1 = 1 represents the xit,f is at the second DTR level. Similar interpretations apply to Tit,f 2 = 1 and Tit,f 3 = 1. To investigate the mean temperature pattern over different DTR levels, Model (1) is modified as follows:
log ( E Y it ) = log ( d it ) + β i 0 + g = 1 3 α g × T it , fg + l = 3 10 f x i t l , T m , β T m l T it , fg + l = 4 15 f x i t l , r , β rl + l = 4 15 f x i t l , h , β hl ,

There are two differences between Model (2) and Model (1). The major difference is that β T m l is replaced by β T m l T it , fg , indicating the model coefficients β T m l is varying over different level of DTR, Tit,fg. As a result, the effect of mean temperatures depends on the corresponding level of temperature fluctuations. In addition to allowing for the lag non-linear effect of mean temperatures, this model can reveal the effect change over temperature fluctuations. Therefore, there should be four distinctive lag non-linear patterns for mean temperatures provided that the variation does exist. The second difference is the inclusion of Tit,fg. Like the ordinary categorical predictor, the lowest level for Tit,fg was chosen as the reference group, with the remaining three parameters representing the difference effects with respect to the reference group. Specifically, Tit,f 0 was specified as the reference group, and α1, α2 and α3 represent difference effects for Tit,f 1, Tit,f 2 and Tit,f 3, respectively.

On the other hand, Model (2) made the same assumption as Model (1) for the rainfall and mean relative humidity. These two variables do not have interaction with the temperature fluctuation. Zero was used for all climatic factors as the reference value to report the result.

The result might be sensitive to the lag range specification. As sensitivity for the lag range, instead of the tenth week, the 12th week was also specified as the maximum lag range for temperatures.

All the implementations above were accomplished by R. R is a free software programming language and a software environment for statistical computing and graphics [37]. Specifically, the add-on packages lme4 [38] was used for the parameter estimation.


Descriptive analysis

From 2004 to 2009, 21,944 malaria cases were reported in the selected 30 counties in southwest China. Table 1 presents the descriptive analysis for the 30 counties.The four intervals defining the four levels of DTR are (3.93°C, 9.53°C), (9.53°C, 11.14°C), (11.14°C, 14.01°C), (14.01°C, 23.73°C), and their sample sizes are 2,351, 2,348, 2,344, and 2,347, respectively. Figure 1 demonstrates the comparison of meteorological variables between different levels of DTR. For the mean temperature, the median values of the two lower DTR groups are a little higher than those of the other two groups, and the overall difference is not large. On the contrary, there are pronounced trends for the rainfall and relative humidity among the four groups. They both show a decreasing pattern with the increase of DTR.
Table 1

Characteristics of the 30 study counties



Annualized average incidences (/100,000)

Mean temperature (°C)

DTR (°C)

Rain (mm)

Relative humidity (%)




21.2 (17.7, 24.6)

10.8 (7.7,14)

26.53 (0, 43.03)

73.0 (67, 80)




20.4 (16, 24.5)

10.7 (7.8, 13.8)

17.80 (1, 24.7)

65.0 (54, 77)




6.7 (1.4,12.3)

10.8 (8, 13.8)

12.29 (2, 17.63)

69.6 (61, 80)




12.3 (7.1, 17.7)

12.4 (9, 15.9)

16.59 (2, 27.85)

67.6 (58, 78)




22.0 (18.9, 25.1)

11.3 (8.2,14.1)

28.02 (0, 41.83)

80.6 (77, 85)




19.8 (16, 23.4)

12.3 (8.5, 16.3)

23.63 (0, 37.93)

72.4 (65, 81)




20 (16.6, 23.1)

12.2 (8.4, 16.1)

32.56 (0, 51.6)

75.3 (70, 82)




16.5 (12.7, 20.7)

7.3 (4.6, 9.6)

28.95 (2.25, 40.35)

84.8 (81, 91)




16.6 (12.1, 20.7)

11.2 (7.9, 14.6)

17.94 (0.08, 27.23)

73.1 (66, 81)




19 (12.3, 25.7)

8.7 (5.1, 11.9)

22.03 (0.7, 33.8)

78.6 (73, 84)




19.1 (15.7, 22.4)

9.9 (6.7, 13)

41.89 (0.38, 69.28)

79.2 (76, 84)




22.8 (19.8, 25.6)

11.8 (8.6, 14.5)

23.17 (0, 38.63)

77.4 (72, 84)




7.0 (1.6, 12.8)

12.5 (7.9, 16.7)

11.76 (0, 17.93)

65.9 (58, 74)




18.3 (14.6, 21.6)

11.3 (7.8, 14.9)

21.22 (0.08, 32.63)

67.6 (59, 77)




19.3 (16.2, 22.3)

10.2 (7.2, 13.1)

27.18 (0, 43.8)

75.9 (71, 83)




24.1 (20.1, 28.1)

11.6 (8.4, 14.3)

15.40 (0, 21.4)

66.6 (59, 75)




19 (14.6, 23.1)

12.4 (8.3, 16.6)

22.21 (0.38, 31.23)

74.7 (70, 82)




17.6 (13.1, 22.2)

11.4 (8.5, 14.4)

18.39 (0, 28.1)

59.3 (50, 71)




19.5 (16.1, 23.2)

8.7 (6.7, 10.6)

15.90 (0, 21.18)

68.3 (63, 75)




15.6 (9.7, 22)

7.3 (4.6, 9.5)

23.94 (1.5, 32.68)

79.4 (73, 88)




16.4 (10.3, 22.6)

8.1 (5.1, 10.5)

22.30 (1.48, 29.1)

77.5 (72, 84)




16.3 (9.2, 23.8)

7.8 (4.3, 10.9)

23.68 (1.9, 33.33)

81.3 (74, 90)




16.5 (12.9, 20.6)

9.6 (6.8, 12.1)

17.64 (0.5, 26.03)

78.3 (74, 85)




20.0 (14.8, 25.6)

9.1 (5.9, 11.8)

22.43 (0.5, 26.43)

73.2 (67, 80)




17.5 (13.1, 22.4)

10.0 (6.5, 13)

16.98 (0.5, 23.8)

76.8 (72, 84)




15.5 (11.5, 19.5)

10.6 (8.2, 13.1)

20.37 (0, 33.28)

66.2 (55, 78)




16.5 (12.3, 20.5)

10.4 (7.6, 13.1)

15.66 (0, 24.08)

68.2 (59, 80)




15.9 (9.1, 22.8)

7.3 (3.8, 10.1)

19.65 (2.6, 27.85)

77.1 (71, 85)




16.4(12.3, 20.3)

10.8 (7.8, 13.8)

16.23 (0, 23.63)

72.6 (67, 81)




15.6 (10.7, 20.3)

11.9 (8.2, 15.9)

21.53 (0, 27.95)

68.0 (60, 77)

: weekly mean, and the two values in the parenthesis are 25% and 75% percentiles, respectively.

: weekly total, and the two values in the parenthesis are 25% and 75% percentiles, respectively.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Box plot comparison of meteorological variables between four diurnal temperature range levels. The dark line in the middle of the boxes is the median value; the bottom and top of the boxes indicates the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively; whiskers represents 1.5 times the height of the box; and dots with numbers represent value of outlier cases.

The annualized average incidences are 2.88, 3.651, 5.283, and 5.651 per 100,000 for the first to fourth DTR level, respectively. Therefore, the incidence rate was higher with higher DTR.

Varying coefficient distributed lag non-linear model

Table 2 gives the estimate of the main effect of DTR levels, representing the logarithm value of the relative risk ratio (logRR) compared to the reference group. While α2 is positive, α1 and α3 are negative, indicating the third group has the highest relative risk compared with the other three groups. Besides, the first group has the second highest relative risk, while the fourth group presents the lowest relative risk. However, the three parameters have confidence intervals containing zero, meaning their differences with respect to the reference group is not statistically significant.
Table 2

The estimate of the main effect of diurnal temperature range levels



Standard error

95% confidence interval

α 1





α 2





α 3





Figure 2 shows the estimates of distributed lag non-linear relationships between mean temperatures and malaria incidences, and three to ten weeks was used as the lag range for mean temperature in Figure 2. Additional file 2 gives the same result while specifying three to12 weeks as the lag range. The results are presented in terms of the combination of three lags and four DTR levels. The Y-axis represents the logarithm value of the relative risk ratio compared to the reference temperature 0°C.
Figure 2
Figure 2

The estimates of non-linear patterns between mean temperatures and malaria incidences, with three to ten weeks being the lag range of temperatures. The Y-axis represents the logarithm value of the relative risk ratio compared to the reference temperature 0°C. The solid line is the estimated non-linear curve, with dashed lines indicating its 95% confidence interval. On the one hand, A, B, C, D show the scenario for the fourth week lag; E, F, G, H show the scenario for the sixth week lag; and I, J, K, L show the scenario for the eighth week lag. On the other hand, A, E, I are at the first (lowest) DTR level; B, F, J are at the second DTR level; C, G, K are at the third DTR level; and D, H, L are at the fourth (highest) DTR level. The range of X-axis depends on the corresponding range of mean temperatures.

First, in Figure 2, for each time lag the four DTR levels present distinct non-linear patterns between mean temperatures and malaria incidences, and the highest DTR level shows an inverse-U shape. More specifically, in the highest DTR group when the mean temperature is greater than approximate 24°C, the logRR starts declining for all lags, and the inverse-U shape can also be observed at the eighth week lag in the second highest DTR group, while the coefficient levels off for the fourth and sixth weeks lags in the second highest DTR group. Those patterns are slightly marked in Additional file 2, in which the inverse-U shape is more evident in the highest DTR level. By contrast, in Figure 2 there is a non-decreasing pattern for mean temperatures in the two lower DTR groups. To be more specific, at the fourth and sixth weeks lags, in the two lower DTR groups, the logRR shows a steadily increasing tendency with the increase mean temperatures, while at the eighth week lag the logRR tends to increase at a lower rate when the mean temperature is relatively high. In Additional file 2, the logRR presents a constant increasing trend for all lags in the two lower DTR groups.

Second, from Figure 2 and Additional file 2, when less than 20°C, the mean temperature in the two higher DTR groups has a sharper ‘slope’ compared with those of two lower DTR groups, indicating a faster increasing trend in the higher daily fluctuation groups.

Third, in Figure 2, the cut-off value for the increasing to decreasing inverse ranges from 24°C to 25°C in the highest DTR group, while in Additional file 2 it ranges from 21°C to 23°C in the highest DTR group.

Fourth, in both Figure 2 and Additional file 2, the sixth week lag has the largest correlation within each of the four DTR levels, and the fourth week lag shows a larger correlation than the eighth week lag.

Contrasting Figure 2 and Additional file 2 shows that the general pattern is robust with respect to the lag range for the mean temperature.


Temperature is an important determinant for the dynamics and distribution of malaria. Despite extensive laboratory knowledge acquired on both the vector and the parasite, important questions remain on the precise role and interactions of the various biological processes driven by temperature [3941].

Laboratory empirical studies have shown that the daily temperature fluctuation can affect both the mosquito [8, 42] and parasites [8]. In particular, [8] provides empirical evidence that temperature fluctuations can affect all of the essential mosquito and parasite traits that determine malaria transmission intensity. Based on these laboratory studies, it is anticipated that similar results should be found in the epidemiological study.

The results find that the correlation between malaria incidence and mean temperature depends on daily temperature fluctuations. When under cooler temperature conditions, the larger mean temperature effect on malaria incidences is found in the groups of higher DTR, suggesting that a large daily temperature fluctuation acts to speed up the malaria incidence in cooler environmental conditions. On the other hand, under the warmer condition, high daily fluctuation will lead to slow down the mean temperature effect, which which can be observed in the highest DTR group and some lags in the second highest group in Figure 2 and Additional file 2. These results are consistent with the previous theoretical [5, 6] and empirical laboratory studies [8]. In particular, the following explanation from the laboratory study [8] can be used to explain the pattern in this study. The key mosquito- and parasite-related traits determining malaria transmission intensity are all sensitive to daily variation in temperature, including parasite infection, parasite growth and development, immature mosquito development and survival, length of the gonotrophic cycle, and adult survival. In general, fluctuation increases relative rate processes under cool conditions and slows rate processes under warm conditions. The pattern in this work may result from the effect of one, or a combination of these mosquito- and parasite-related traits. However, as a limitation of the epidemiological study, this work cannot tell which traits have the effect.

The optimal mean temperature for the malaria transmission are detected as 24-25°C or 21-23°C, depending on the choices of lag ranges. For extrinsic incubation period (EIP), 21°C was identified by [5] as the point of inflection, and 25-28°C were identified as the optimal mean temperatures [5]. With the mean temperature of <21°C, temperature fluctuations could speed up the parasite development, whereas temperature fluctuations could slow the development with the mean temperature of >21°C. Moreover, 25°C was found by [4] to be to the optimal mean temperature for malaria transmission after considering several transmission parameters, such as the bite rate, the parasite development rate. The result agrees with those studies by finding similar optimal mean temperatures.

The lag has an effect increasing from the fourth to sixth weeks and decreasing from the sixth to eighth weeks, which is biologically plausible, as mean temperatures occurring on the same week or weeks too early before should not affect the malaria incidences in the current week.

α1, α2 and α3 are included for the main effect from the DTR level. It is noticeable from Figure 1 that the four groups of different DTR level do not have identical baseline distribution for the mean temperature, and therefore, the average effect should be distinct even under the same DTR condition. α1, α2 and α3 are used to represent this average difference, thus keeping all distributed lag non-linear curves starting from zero at the reference mean temperature. Consequently, the focus can be kept on the variation pattern for the mean temperature. Besides, the variation pattern of humidity and rainfall were not studied, as a previous study [35] has reported the results, and the scientific question here focuses on temperatures.

Instead of daily data, weekly data were used in this study for several reasons. First, the meteorological variables in close days should have similar values. Second, weekly malaria incidence can eliminate the possible week effect leading to the falsely elevated/reduced report rates in weekends. Third, daily data would give rise to a huge number of zero counts for cases compared to weekly data, which would make the parameter estimation unstable. Lastly, the lag range is well studied in the weekly scale.

Limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, as with all observational studies for malaria and meteorological factors, it is likely that some confounding factors influence the result. Thirty counties might have different preventive measures (with different magnitudes) to combat malaria, and they may also have different behaviour habits, such as the use of nets. Including city-specific random effect could not eliminate the potential bias. Second, the quality and completeness of the data may change over the six-year period. The change mainly occurs in the time dimension [4345], with the best quality in 2009 [45]. Third, the microclimate variation was not considered owing to the lack of relevant data. There are two kinds of variations, indoor air temperature versus outdoor air temperature [46], and water temperature versus air temperature [47]. However, it is not unreasonable to assume these factors do not present a systematic trend to confound the results in this study. Fourth, only the 30 counties with malaria prevalence were used in this study, and counties with zero malaria were not included in the analysis. However, this should not influence the result too much. It is evident from Table 1 that the 30 counties also included many low-incidence counties, such as Eshan with just 11 malaria cases for six years. The annualized average incidences range from 348.2/100,000 to 1.1/100,000. Fifth, the mosquito vector information did not exist in this study, hence this study cannot assess the impact. Finally, P. vivax and P. falciparum malaria could have different non-linear patterns. This study did not separate analyses by different parasites owing to a lack of detailed information on P. vivax and P. falciparum in this study. As pointed by [8], there is no reason to believe that the sensitivities of some parasites and mosquitoes are unique among malaria parasites and their mosquito vectors. Nonetheless, further epidemiological research is warranted to explore the possible different patterns.


Using weekly malaria cases and meteorological information, this work studied the correlation between malaria incidences and mean temperature and temperature fluctuation over six years (2004–2009) in 30 counties in southwest China. This work may be the first epidemiological study confirming that the effect of mean temperatures depends on temperature fluctuation. Although as with other observational studies, the analysis cannot make direct cause-effect interpretation, the results can still be viewed as a supplementary evidence at the population level for the existing theoretic and laboratory evidence. The environment is rarely constant, and the result highlights the need to consider temperature fluctuations as well as mean temperatures, when trying to understand or predict malaria transmission.



The three reviewers’ comments have greatly improved the content and readability of the manuscript. The Figure in the Additional file 1 was reproduced from a previous article written by same authors [35], and the Figure was included for the purpose of completeness. In addition, Table 1, with some new data, was partly reproduced from that previous article. This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30571618), China Scholarship Council (

Authors’ Affiliations

West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, No.17 Section 3, South Renmin Road, 610041 Chengdu, China
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, 98195, USA
Office for Disease Control and Emergency Response, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, NE Pacific Street, 102206 Beijing, China
HSR&D Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1100 Olive Way Metro Park West Suite 1400, Seattle, 98101, USA


  1. Detinova T: Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria. Monogr Ser World Health Organ. 1962, 47: 13-191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhou G, Minakawa N, Githeko AK, Yan G: Association between climate variability and malaria epidemics in the East African highlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 2375-2380. 10.1073/pnas.0308714100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ecology of Malaria. [] Accessed: 2013-11-11
  4. Mordecai EA, Paaijmans KP, Johnson LR, Balzer C, Ben-Horin T, de Moor E, McNally A, Pawar S, Ryan SJ, Smith TC, Lafferty KD: Optimal temperature for malaria transmission is dramatically lower than previously predicted. Ecol Lett. 2013, 16: 22-30. 10.1111/ele.12015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Paaijmans KP, Read AF, Thomas MB: Understanding the link between malaria risk and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 13844-13849. 10.1073/pnas.0903423106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanford JI, Blanford S, Crane RG, Mann ME, Paaijmans KP, Schreiber KV, Thomas MB: Implications of temperature variation for malaria parasite development across Africa. Sci Rep. 2013, 3: 1300-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Paaijmans KP, Thomas MB: Relevant temperatures in mosquito and malaria biology. Ecology of parasite-vector interactions. Edited by: Takken W, Koenraadt CJM. 2013, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 103-121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Paaijmans KP, Blanford S, Bell AS, Blanford JI, Read AF, Thomas MB: Influence of climate on malaria transmission depends on daily temperature variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 15135-15139. 10.1073/pnas.1006422107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lambrechts L, Paaijmans KP, Fansiri T, Carrington LB, Kramer LD, Thomas MB, Scott TW: Impact of daily temperature fluctuations on dengue virus transmission by Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 7460-7465. 10.1073/pnas.1101377108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrington LB, Armijos MV, Lambrechts L, Scott TW: Fluctuations at a low mean temperature accelerate dengue virus transmission by Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7: e2190-10.1371/journal.pntd.0002190.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Teklehaimanot HD, Lipsitch M, Teklehaimanot A, Schwartz J: Weather-based prediction of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in epidemic-prone regions of Ethiopia I Patterns of lagged weather effects reflect biological mechanisms. Malar J. 2004, 3: 41-10.1186/1475-2875-3-41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwartz J: The distributed lag between air pollution and daily deaths. Epidemiology. 2000, 11: 320-326. 10.1097/00001648-200005000-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pascual M, Ahumada JA, Chaves LF, Rodo X, Bouma M: Malaria resurgence in the East African highlands: temperature trends revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 5829-5834. 10.1073/pnas.0508929103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosoniu L, Veta AM, Vounatsou P: Bayesian geostatistical modeling of Malaria Indicator Survey data in Angola. PLoS One. 2010, 5: 9322-10.1371/journal.pone.0009322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Parham PE, Michael E: Modeling the effects of weather and climate change on malaria transmission. Environ Health Perspect. 2010, 118: 620-626.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhou SS, Huang F, Wang JJ, Zhang SS, Su YP, Tang LH: Geographical, meteorological and vectorial factors related to malaria re-emergence in Huang-Huai River of central China. Malar J. 2010, 9: 337-10.1186/1475-2875-9-337.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomson MC, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Mason SJ, Hagedorn R, Connor SJ, Phindela T, Morse AP, Palmer TN: Malaria early warnings based on seasonal climate forecasts from multi-model ensembles. Nature. 2006, 439: 576-579. 10.1038/nature04503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Briët OJ, Vounatsou P, Gunawardena DM, Galappaththy GN, Amerasinghe PH: Models for short term malaria prediction in Sri Lanka. Malar J. 2008, 7: 76-10.1186/1475-2875-7-76.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gasparrini A: Modeling exposure–lag–response associations with distributed lag non‒linear models. Stat Med. 2013, 33: 881-899.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhou SS, Wang Y, Xia ZG: Malaria situation in the People's Republic Of China in 2009. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 2011, 29: 1-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Clements ACA, Barnett AG, Cheng ZW, Snow RW, Zhou HN: Space-time variation of malaria incidence in Yunnan province. China Malar J. 2009, 8: 180-10.1186/1475-2875-8-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hui F, Xu B, Chen Z, Cheng X, Liang L, Huang H, Fang L, Yang H, Zhou H, Yang H: Spatio-temporal distribution of malaria in Yunnan Province, China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 503-509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bi Y, Hu W, Yang H, Zhou X, Yu W, Guo Y, Tong S: Spatial patterns of malaria reported deaths in Yunnan Province, China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013, 88: 526-535. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0217.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yin J, Xia Z, Yan H, Huang Y, Lu L, Geng Y, Xiao N, Xu J, He P, Zhou S: Verification of clinically diagnosed cases during malaria elimination programme in Guizhou Province of China. Malar J. 2013, 12: 130-10.1186/1475-2875-12-130.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chinese Meteorological Data Sharing Service System. [] Accessed: 2013-11-11
  26. Huang F, Zhou S, Zhang S, Zhang H, Li W: Meteorological Factors–Based Spatio-Temporal Mapping and Predicting Malaria in Central China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011, 85: 560-567. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang F, Zhou S, Zhang S, Wang H, Tang L: Temporal correlation analysis between malaria and meteorological factors in Motuo County. Tibet Malar J. 2011, 10: 54-10.1186/1475-2875-10-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tian L, Bi Y, Ho S, Liu W, Liang S, Goggins W, Chan E, Zhou S, Sung J: One-year delayed effect of fog on malaria transmission: a time-series analysis in the rain forest area of Mengla County, south-west China. Malar J. 2008, 7: 110-10.1186/1475-2875-7-110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao D, Long Y, Wang S, Fang L, Xu D, Wang G, Li L, Cao W, Yan Y: Spatiotemporal distribution of malaria and the association between its epidemic and climate factors in Hainan. China Malar J. 2010, 9: 185-10.1186/1475-2875-9-185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin H, Lu L, Tian L, Zhou S, Wu H, Bi Y, Ho SC, Liu Q: Spatial and temporal distribution of falciparum malaria in China. Malar J. 2009, 8: 130-10.1186/1475-2875-8-130.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Waller KL, McBride SM, Kim K, McDonald TV: Characterization of two putative potassium channels in Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J. 2008, 7: 19-10.1186/1475-2875-7-19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang L, Wang Y, Jin S, Wu Z, Chin DP, Koplan JP, Wilson ME: Emergence and control of infectious diseases in China. Lancet. 2008, 372: 1598-1605. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61365-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Craig MH, Kleinschmidt I, Nawn JB, Le Sueur D, Sharp BL: Exploring 30 years of malaria case data in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: part I. The impact of climatic factors. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 1247-1257. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01340.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dell AI, Pawar S, Savage VM: Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 10591-10596. 10.1073/pnas.1015178108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao X, Chen F, Feng Z, Li X, Zhou XH: The temporal lagged association between meteorological factors and malaria in 30 counties in south-west China: a multilevel distributed lag non-linear analysis. Malar J. 2014, 13: 57-10.1186/1475-2875-13-57.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hastie T, Tibshirani R: Varying-coefficient models. J R Stat Soc B. 1993, 55: 757-796.Google Scholar
  37. RCoreTeam: R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2013, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, URL: http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
  38. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S: lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version. 2013, 1-5.Google Scholar
  39. Pascual M, Dobson AP, Bouma MJ: Underestimating malaria risk under variable temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 13645-13646. 10.1073/pnas.0906909106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pascual M, Bouma MJ: Do rising temperatures matter?. Ecology. 2009, 90: 906-912. 10.1890/08-0730.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Chaves LF, Koenraadt CJ: Climate change and highland malaria: fresh air for a hot debate. Q Rev Biol. 2010, 85: 27-55. 10.1086/650284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyons CL, Coetzee M, Chown SL: Stable and fluctuating temperature effects on the development rate and survival of two malaria vectors, Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 104-10.1186/1756-3305-6-104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ma J, Wang L, Qi X, Zhang C, Guo Q, Ge H, Guo Y: Quality analysis on the reports of notifiable diseases in 2004. Disease surveillance. 2005, 20: 264-266.Google Scholar
  44. Wang L, Guo Y, Guo Q, Zhang C, Qi X, Ma J, Yan G: Quality evaluation of infectious diseases information based on internet reporting system in 2006. Disease surveillance. 2007, 22: 412-414.Google Scholar
  45. Liu S, Wang L, Zhang C, Wang X, Guo Q, Cai Y, Zhou M, Ma J: Evaluation on quality of notifiable communicable disease network direct reporting and discussion about evaluation indicators in China, 2009. Disease surveillance. 2011, 26: 499-503.Google Scholar
  46. Paaijmans KP, Thomas MB: The influence of mosquito resting behaviour and associated microclimate for malaria risk. Malar J. 2011, 10: 183-10.1186/1475-2875-10-183.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Paaijmans KP, Imbahale SS, Thomas MB, Takken W: Relevant microclimate for determining the development rate of malaria mosquitoes and possible implications of climate change. Malar J. 2010, 9: 196-10.1186/1475-2875-9-196.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.